LUMN vs SIRI Stock Comparison
Compare LUMN and SIRI across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between LUMN and SIRI?
LUMN leads the current stock comparison as Lumen Technologies, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Lumen Technologies, Inc. vs Sirius XM Holdings Inc.
LUMN leads
LUMN leads by 2 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Quality, having only recently taken the lead back from SIRI.
Fragile: 1 of 6 evidence groups support LUMN, the lead recently changed hands, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Lumen Technologies, Inc.
Sirius XM Holdings Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors LUMN over SIRI, 56 versus 54 as of Sep 11, 2026. LUMN's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and quality, while SIRI holds the stronger risk resilience profile. LUMN also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 1 of 6 covered evidence groups favor LUMN today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. LUMN lead: Reversed — SIRI led by 1 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; LUMN now leads by 2.
Compare Lumen Technologies, Inc. and Sirius XM Holdings Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare LUMN and SIRI against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience23 vs 51SIRI +28
- Momentum70 vs 52LUMN +18
- Quality52 vs 46LUMN +6
- Value65 vs 66Even
1 of 6 evidence groups favor LUMN. LUMN’s edge is concentrated in momentum and quality; SIRI keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum +3
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum +4
No new signals fired.
LUMN's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — LUMN and SIRI both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
LUMN (Lumen Technologies, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and quality.
SIRI (Sirius XM Holdings Inc.): the counter-case, on risk resilience, fundamentals, technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
LUMNLUMN on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
SIRISIRI on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
LUMNLUMN on the Momentum factor, by 18 points.
Lower downside
SIRISIRI on Risk Resilience, by 28 points.
Analyst upside
LUMNLUMN on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | LUMN | SIRI | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +15.3% | +14.2% | LUMN has more room |
| Target dispersion | 0% | +51.1% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 1 | 7 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
1 of 6 covered evidence groups favor LUMN. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 56 vs 54 |
| Fundamentals | SIRIon balance | revenue growth -3.2% vs 3.3%; EPS growth 0% vs -2.7%; TTM ROE -52.1% vs 7.5%; gross margin 47.8% vs 46.2%; operating margin -3.4% vs 19.2% — SIRI takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | Even | Value 65 vs 66 |
| Technicals | SIRI | Price vs 50-day 8.2% vs -1.8%; vs 200-day -11.9% vs 14.8% |
| Risk Resilience | SIRI | Risk Resilience 23 vs 51 |
| Analyst expectations | LUMN | Target upside 15.3% vs 14.2% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of LUMN and SIRI and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 1 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on LUMN.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10LUMN lead: Reversed — SIRI led by 1 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; LUMN now leads by 2.
- Today
- LUMN +2
- 56 vs 54
- 7 sessions ago
- Level
- 53 vs 53
- 30 sessions ago
- SIRI +1
- 48 vs 49
- 90 sessions ago
- SIRI +18
- 44 vs 62
The lead changed hands 2 times in this window, most recently on Aug 14 when LUMN moved ahead of SIRI.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 1 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (20.56%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (5.22%)
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (17.95%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
LUMN leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +1.91%, AIQ +1 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +0.95%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1SIRI closes the Momentum gap — currently 18 points behind, the largest single contributor to LUMN's edge.
- 2SIRI's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3LUMN's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
SIRI leads on balance| Metric | LUMN | SIRI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -3.2% | 3.3% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 0% | -2.7% |
| Gross margin | 47.8% | 46.2% |
| Operating margin | -3.4% | 19.2% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -52.1% | 7.5% |
| Debt to equity | -9.07 | 0.79 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | LUMN | SIRI |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 0% | -2.8% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 8.3% | 1.5% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -17.6% | 4.7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 2.4% | 29.1% |
| Year to date | -12.4% | 44.4% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 33% | 18.2% |
Technicals
SIRI has the stronger structure| Metric | LUMN | SIRI |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 68 | 54.2 |
| ADX (14) | 16 | 9.6 |
| Price vs 50-day | 8.2% | -1.8% |
| Price vs 200-day | -11.9% | 14.8% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 52.7% | 34.5% |
Risk
SIRI is the more resilient| Metric | LUMN | SIRI |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.87 | 0.38 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.58 | 0.57 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.95 | 0.99 |
| Max drawdown | -52.1% | -17.9% |
| Current drawdown | -42.4% | -11.4% |
| Annualized volatility | 80% | 33.9% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -6% | -2.7% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, LUMN or SIRI?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, LUMN is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 56 against SIRI's 54. The edge comes from momentum and quality. SIRI is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is LUMN or SIRI the better buy right now?
LUMN carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 1 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor LUMN over SIRI?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. SIRI leads Risk Resilience by 28 points; LUMN leads Momentum by 18 points; LUMN leads Quality by 6 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, LUMN or SIRI?
Analyst price targets imply +15.3% upside for LUMN and +14.2% for SIRI, so the Street currently favors LUMN. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, LUMN or SIRI?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, LUMN or SIRI?
SIRI on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, LUMN or SIRI?
LUMN on the Momentum factor, by 18 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, LUMN or SIRI?
SIRI is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. SIRI on Risk Resilience, by 28 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is LUMN more profitable than SIRI?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 47.8% vs 46.2%; operating margin -3.4% vs 19.2%; ttm roe -52.1% vs 7.5%. LUMN leads on one measure and SIRI on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is LUMN's lead over SIRI getting stronger or weaker?
LUMN lead: Reversed — SIRI led by 1 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; LUMN now leads by 2. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 2 times in that window, most recently on 2026-08-14, when LUMN moved ahead of SIRI.
What would change the LUMN vs SIRI verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: SIRI closes the Momentum gap — currently 18 points behind, the largest single contributor to LUMN's edge; SIRI's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; LUMN's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about LUMN and SIRI?
LUMN: 1 bullish / 1 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. SIRI: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on LUMN is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On SIRI it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare LUMN and SIRI with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.