MAG vs NEM Stock Comparison
NEM currently leads MAG in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 61 vs 55. The clearest difference is quality, while MAG has the stronger risk resilience profile.
What is the main difference between MAG and NEM?
NEM leads the current stock comparison as Newmont Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
MAG Silver Corp. vs Newmont Corporation
NEM leads
NEM leads by 6 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Value, and the lead has widened from 2 points over 30 sessions.
Stable: 3 of 5 evidence groups support NEM, its lead is widening, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
MAG Silver Corp.
Newmont Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors NEM over MAG, 61 versus 55 as of Oct 21, 2026. NEM's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and value, while MAG holds the stronger risk resilience profile. 3 of 5 covered evidence groups favor NEM today, and the comparison is rated Stable on stability. NEM lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 2 to 6 points over 30 sessions.
Compare MAG Silver Corp. and Newmont Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare MAG and NEM against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience100 vs 62MAG +38
- Quality40 vs 77NEM +37
- Value47 vs 51NEM +4
3 of 5 evidence groups favor NEM. NEM’s edge is concentrated in quality and value; MAG keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session.
Largest factor move: Momentum +2
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 2 active signals are unchanged.
NEM's lead widened by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — MAG and NEM both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
NEM (Newmont Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and value.
MAG (MAG Silver Corp.): the counter-case, on risk resilience.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
NEMNEM on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
MAGMAG on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
NEMNEM on the peer-relative Value factor, by 4 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
MAGMAG on Risk Resilience, by 38 points.
Analyst upside
NEMNEM on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | MAG | NEM | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | -10.1% | +21.2% | NEM has more room |
| Target dispersion | 0% | +45.8% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 1 | 11 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 5 covered evidence groups favor NEM. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | NEM | 55 vs 61 |
| Fundamentals | Even | EPS growth 17.9% vs -31.2%; TTM ROE 10.3% vs 25% |
| Valuation | NEM | Value 47 vs 51 |
| Technicals | Not covered | Not covered |
| Risk Resilience | MAG | Risk Resilience 100 vs 62 |
| Analyst expectations | NEM | Target upside -10.1% vs 21.2% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of MAG and NEM and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion rests on a wide gap and broad agreement. It is unlikely to turn on a single session.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 6 points.
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on NEM.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20NEM lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 2 to 6 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- NEM +6
- 55 vs 61
- 7 sessions ago
- NEM +2
- 55 vs 57
- 30 sessions ago
- NEM +2
- 55 vs 57
- 90 sessions ago
- NEM +12
- 56 vs 68
The lead changed hands 7 times in this window, most recently on Oct 15 when NEM moved ahead of MAG.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
No active signals
No signal that the other name lacks.
2 bullish / 0 bearish
Only NEM
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (8.45%)
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +0.32%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1MAG closes the Quality gap — currently 37 points behind, the largest single contributor to NEM's edge.
- 2MAG generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as Golden Cross Active or MACD Bullish Crossover.
- 3NEM's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | MAG | NEM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 0% | -51.9% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 17.9% | -31.2% |
| Gross margin | 0% | 54.5% |
| Operating margin | 0% | 51.4% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 10.3% | 25% |
| Debt to equity | 0 | 0.15 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | MAG | NEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | — | 1.1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | — | -8.2% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | — | 22% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | — | 6.9% |
| Year to date | — | 17% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | — | 23% |
Technicals
Split| Metric | MAG | NEM |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | — | 53 |
| ADX (14) | — | 14.2 |
| Price vs 50-day | — | -3.8% |
| Price vs 200-day | — | 4% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | — | 32.8% |
Risk
MAG is the more resilient| Metric | MAG | NEM |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | — | 1.69 |
| Sharpe ratio | — | 0.68 |
| Sortino ratio | — | 0.99 |
| Max drawdown | — | -32.4% |
| Current drawdown | — | -13.6% |
| Annualized volatility | — | 49.1% |
| Value at risk (95%) | — | -5.2% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, MAG or NEM?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, NEM is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 61 against MAG's 55. The edge comes from quality and value. MAG is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is MAG or NEM the better buy right now?
NEM carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Stable — 3 of 5 covered evidence groups agree. A Stable rating means the gap is wide and the evidence is broad, so the conclusion is unlikely to turn on a single session.
Why does the AIQ Score favor NEM over MAG?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. MAG leads Risk Resilience by 38 points; NEM leads Quality by 37 points; NEM leads Value by 4 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, MAG or NEM?
Analyst price targets imply -10.1% upside for MAG and +21.2% for NEM, so the Street currently favors NEM. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, MAG or NEM?
NEM is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. NEM on the peer-relative Value factor, by 4 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, MAG or NEM?
MAG on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, MAG or NEM?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, MAG or NEM?
MAG is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. MAG on Risk Resilience, by 38 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is MAG more profitable than NEM?
NEM leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 0% vs 54.5%; operating margin 0% vs 51.4%; ttm roe 10.3% vs 25%.
Is NEM's lead over MAG getting stronger or weaker?
NEM lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 2 to 6 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 7 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-15, when NEM moved ahead of MAG.
What would change the MAG vs NEM verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: MAG closes the Quality gap — currently 37 points behind, the largest single contributor to NEM's edge; MAG generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as Golden Cross Active or MACD Bullish Crossover; NEM's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about MAG and NEM?
MAG: No active signals. NEM: 2 bullish / 0 bearish. On NEM it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare MAG and NEM with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.