MAG vs NGD Stock Comparison
NGD currently leads MAG in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 61 vs 55. The clearest difference is quality, while MAG has the stronger risk resilience profile.
What is the main difference between MAG and NGD?
NGD leads the current stock comparison as New Gold Inc., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
MAG Silver Corp. vs New Gold Inc.
NGD leads
NGD leads by 6 AIQ points, primarily on Quality.
Competitive: 2 of 5 evidence groups support NGD.
MAG Silver Corp.
New Gold Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors NGD over MAG, 61 versus 55 as of Oct 21, 2026. NGD's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality, while MAG holds the stronger risk resilience profile. 2 of 5 covered evidence groups favor NGD today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: only 2 of 5 covered evidence groups agree. NGD lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 6 points over 30 sessions.
Compare MAG Silver Corp. and New Gold Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare MAG and NGD against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality40 vs 90NGD +50
- Risk Resilience100 vs 52MAG +48
- Value47 vs 36MAG +11
2 of 5 evidence groups favor NGD. NGD’s edge is concentrated in quality; MAG keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session.
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session.
NGD's lead was unchanged in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — MAG and NGD both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
NGD (New Gold Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality.
MAG (MAG Silver Corp.): the counter-case, on risk resilience, value, valuation.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
NGDNGD on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
MAGMAG on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
MAGMAG on the peer-relative Value factor, by 11 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
MAGMAG on Risk Resilience, by 48 points.
Analyst upside
NGDNGD on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | MAG | NGD | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | -10.1% | +40.4% | NGD has more room |
| Target dispersion | 0% | 0% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 1 | 1 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 5 covered evidence groups favor NGD. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | NGD | 55 vs 61 |
| Fundamentals | Even | EPS growth 17.9% vs 3.7%; TTM ROE 10.3% vs 64.8% |
| Valuation | MAG | Value 47 vs 36 |
| Technicals | Not covered | Not covered |
| Risk Resilience | MAG | Risk Resilience 100 vs 52 |
| Analyst expectations | NGD | Target upside -10.1% vs 40.4% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of MAG and NGD and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 6 points.
- Only 2 of 5 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on NGD.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20NGD lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 6 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- NGD +6
- 55 vs 61
- 7 sessions ago
- NGD +6
- 55 vs 61
- 30 sessions ago
- NGD +6
- 55 vs 61
- 90 sessions ago
- MAG +9
- 56 vs 47
The lead changed hands once in this window, most recently on Sep 2 when NGD moved ahead of MAG.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
No active signals
No signal that the other name lacks.
No active signals
No signal that the other name lacks.
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1MAG closes the Quality gap — currently 50 points behind, the largest single contributor to NGD's edge.
- 2MAG generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as Golden Cross Active or MACD Bullish Crossover.
- 3NGD starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | MAG | NGD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 0% | 10.5% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 17.9% | 3.7% |
| Gross margin | 0% | 51.8% |
| Operating margin | 0% | 44.8% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 10.3% | 64.8% |
| Debt to equity | 0 | 0.21 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | MAG | NGD |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | — | -15.3% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | — | -14.6% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | — | 10.3% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | — | 41.2% |
| Year to date | — | 4.2% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | — | 170.2% |
Technicals
Split| Metric | MAG | NGD |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | — | 22.1 |
| ADX (14) | — | 22.6 |
| Price vs 50-day | — | -18.6% |
| Price vs 200-day | — | 28% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | — | 69.9% |
Risk
MAG is the more resilient| Metric | MAG | NGD |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | — | 2.74 |
| Sharpe ratio | — | 1.13 |
| Sortino ratio | — | 1.5 |
| Max drawdown | — | -32.3% |
| Current drawdown | — | -32.3% |
| Annualized volatility | — | 71.4% |
| Value at risk (95%) | — | -7.5% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, MAG or NGD?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, NGD is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 61 against MAG's 55. The edge comes from quality. MAG is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is MAG or NGD the better buy right now?
NGD carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 2 of 5 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor NGD over MAG?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. NGD leads Quality by 50 points; MAG leads Risk Resilience by 48 points; MAG leads Value by 11 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, MAG or NGD?
Analyst price targets imply -10.1% upside for MAG and +40.4% for NGD, so the Street currently favors NGD. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, MAG or NGD?
MAG is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. MAG on the peer-relative Value factor, by 11 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, MAG or NGD?
MAG on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, MAG or NGD?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, MAG or NGD?
MAG is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. MAG on Risk Resilience, by 48 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is MAG more profitable than NGD?
NGD leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 0% vs 51.8%; operating margin 0% vs 44.8%; ttm roe 10.3% vs 64.8%.
Is NGD's lead over MAG getting stronger or weaker?
NGD lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 6 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands once in that window, most recently on 2026-09-02, when NGD moved ahead of MAG.
What would change the MAG vs NGD verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: MAG closes the Quality gap — currently 50 points behind, the largest single contributor to NGD's edge; MAG generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as Golden Cross Active or MACD Bullish Crossover; NGD starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about MAG and NGD?
MAG: No active signals. NGD: No active signals.
Compare MAG and NGD with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.