MAS vs TREX Stock Comparison
MAS currently leads TREX in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 62 vs 58. The clearest difference is value, while TREX has the stronger quality profile.
What is the main difference between MAS and TREX?
MAS leads the current stock comparison as Masco Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Masco Corporation vs Trex Company, Inc.
MAS leads
MAS leads by 4 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Risk Resilience.
Fragile: 4 of 6 evidence groups support MAS, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Masco Corporation
Trex Company, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors MAS over TREX, 62 versus 58 as of Oct 22, 2026. MAS's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and risk resilience, while TREX holds the stronger quality profile. MAS also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor MAS today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. MAS lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 4 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Masco Corporation and Trex Company, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare MAS and TREX against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value63 vs 43MAS +20
- Quality47 vs 60TREX +13
- Risk Resilience56 vs 50MAS +6
- Momentum81 vs 80Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor MAS. MAS’s edge is concentrated in value and risk resilience; TREX keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience +1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 7 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +5
New signals
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
MAS's lead narrowed by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — MAS and TREX both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
MAS (Masco Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and risk resilience.
TREX (Trex Company, Inc.): the counter-case, on quality, fundamentals, technicals — but at materially higher volatility, 31.5% against 26.2%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
MASMAS on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
MASMAS on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
MASMAS on the peer-relative Value factor, by 20 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
MASMAS on Risk Resilience, by 6 points.
Analyst upside
MASMAS on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | MAS | TREX | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +7.5% | +5.7% | MAS has more room |
| Target dispersion | +31.2% | +50.4% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 7 | 10 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor MAS. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | MAS | 62 vs 58 |
| Fundamentals | TREXon balance | revenue growth 3.9% vs 21.7%; EPS growth 52.4% vs 3.4%; TTM ROE -4.1% vs 17.4%; gross margin 36.9% vs 38.2%; operating margin 17.7% vs 20.2% — TREX takes 4 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | MAS | Value 63 vs 43 |
| Technicals | TREX | Price vs 50-day 5.3% vs 7.6%; vs 200-day 5.9% vs 14.3% |
| Risk Resilience | MAS | Risk Resilience 56 vs 50 |
| Analyst expectations | MAS | Target upside 7.5% vs 5.7% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of MAS and TREX and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on MAS.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20MAS lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 4 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- MAS +4
- 62 vs 58
- 7 sessions ago
- MAS +5
- 61 vs 56
- 30 sessions ago
- MAS +2
- 51 vs 49
- 90 sessions ago
- TREX +10
- 47 vs 57
The lead changed hands 3 times in this window, most recently on Oct 13 when MAS moved ahead of TREX.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
5 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted
No signal that the other name lacks.
5 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only TREX
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
Both carry 7 more signals that do not separate them: Golden Cross Active, BB Upper Band Breach, Keltner Channel Breakout, RSI Overbought, EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish, Uptrend Structure Active, MACD Bullish Crossover.
MAS leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.13%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.08%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1TREX closes the Value gap — currently 20 points behind, the largest single contributor to MAS's edge.
- 2TREX's BB Upper Band Breach resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3MAS's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 5 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
TREX leads on balance| Metric | MAS | TREX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 3.9% | 21.7% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 52.4% | 3.4% |
| Gross margin | 36.9% | 38.2% |
| Operating margin | 17.7% | 20.2% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -4.1% | 17.4% |
| Debt to equity | -9.57 | 0.29 |
Performance
TREX leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | MAS | TREX |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 7.1% | 8.3% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 6.7% | 10.6% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -4.3% | 14% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 11.8% | 15.7% |
| Year to date | 17.6% | 39.1% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 9.7% | -7.6% |
Technicals
TREX has the stronger structure| Metric | MAS | TREX |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 81.6 | 75.3 |
| ADX (14) | 17.6 | 14.7 |
| Price vs 50-day | 5.3% | 7.6% |
| Price vs 200-day | 5.9% | 14.3% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 26.2% | 31.5% |
Risk
MAS is the more resilient| Metric | MAS | TREX |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.15 | 1.5 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.34 | 0.12 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.54 | 0.13 |
| Max drawdown | -24.7% | -41.3% |
| Current drawdown | -9.8% | -4.9% |
| Annualized volatility | 35.3% | 49.8% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.8% | -3.4% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, MAS or TREX?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, MAS is the stronger of the two as of Oct 22, 2026, scoring 62 against TREX's 58. The edge comes from value and risk resilience. TREX is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is MAS or TREX the better buy right now?
MAS carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 22, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor MAS over TREX?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. MAS leads Value by 20 points; TREX leads Quality by 13 points; MAS leads Risk Resilience by 6 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, MAS or TREX?
Analyst price targets imply +7.5% upside for MAS and +5.7% for TREX, so the Street currently favors MAS. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, MAS or TREX?
MAS is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. MAS on the peer-relative Value factor, by 20 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, MAS or TREX?
MAS on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, MAS or TREX?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, MAS or TREX?
MAS is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. MAS on Risk Resilience, by 6 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is MAS more profitable than TREX?
TREX leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 36.9% vs 38.2%; operating margin 17.7% vs 20.2%; ttm roe -4.1% vs 17.4%.
Is MAS's lead over TREX getting stronger or weaker?
MAS lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 4 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 3 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-13, when MAS moved ahead of TREX.
What would change the MAS vs TREX verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: TREX closes the Value gap — currently 20 points behind, the largest single contributor to MAS's edge; TREX's BB Upper Band Breach resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; MAS's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 5 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about MAS and TREX?
MAS: 5 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted. TREX: 5 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on MAS is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On TREX it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare MAS and TREX with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.