MBLY vs OLED Stock Comparison
OLED currently leads MBLY in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 64 vs 45. The clearest difference is momentum, while MBLY has the stronger risk resilience profile.
What is the main difference between MBLY and OLED?
OLED leads the current stock comparison as Universal Display Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Mobileye Global Inc. vs Universal Display Corporation
OLED leads
OLED leads by 19 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Value, and the lead has widened from 13 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors MBLY on target upside.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support OLED, its lead is widening, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Mobileye Global Inc.
Universal Display Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors OLED over MBLY, 64 versus 45 as of Oct 21, 2026. OLED's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and value, while MBLY holds the stronger risk resilience profile. OLED also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors MBLY. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor OLED today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader is throwing conflicting signals. OLED lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 13 to 19 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Mobileye Global Inc. and Universal Display Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare MBLY and OLED against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum40 vs 67OLED +27
- Value35 vs 60OLED +25
- Quality51 vs 71OLED +20
- Risk Resilience60 vs 56MBLY +4
4 of 6 evidence groups favor OLED. OLED’s edge is concentrated in momentum and value; MBLY keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +6
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +16
New signals
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
OLED's lead widened by 2 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — MBLY and OLED both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
OLED (Universal Display Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and value.
MBLY (Mobileye Global Inc.): the counter-case, on risk resilience, analyst expectations.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
OLEDOLED on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
MBLYMBLY on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
OLEDOLED on the peer-relative Value factor, by 25 points.
Momentum
OLEDOLED on the Momentum factor, by 27 points.
Lower downside
MBLYMBLY on Risk Resilience, by 4 points.
Analyst upside
MBLYMBLY on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors OLED, analyst targets favor MBLY. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | MBLY | OLED | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +62.5% | +42.6% | MBLY has more room |
| Target dispersion | +96.4% | +65.2% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 13 | 4 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor OLED. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | OLED | 45 vs 64 |
| Fundamentals | OLEDon balance | revenue growth -9% vs 7%; EPS growth 99.4% vs 39.5%; TTM ROE -40.4% vs 11.4%; gross margin 47.4% vs 75.3%; operating margin -19.2% vs 34.1% — OLED takes 4 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | OLED | Value 35 vs 60 |
| Technicals | OLED | Price vs 50-day -12.7% vs 3.5%; vs 200-day -16.3% vs -12.1% |
| Risk Resilience | MBLY | Risk Resilience 60 vs 56 |
| Analyst expectations | MBLY | Target upside 62.5% vs 42.6% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of MBLY and OLED and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 19 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on OLED.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20OLED lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 13 to 19 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- OLED +19
- 45 vs 64
- 7 sessions ago
- OLED +16
- 43 vs 59
- 30 sessions ago
- OLED +13
- 43 vs 56
- 90 sessions ago
- OLED +11
- 52 vs 63
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
Only MBLY
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only OLED
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
Both carry 3 more signals that do not separate them: Death Cross Active, ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode, MACD Bullish Crossover.
OLED leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -3.84%, AIQ +2 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +2.14%, AIQ +4 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1MBLY closes the Momentum gap — currently 27 points behind, the largest single contributor to OLED's edge.
- 2MBLY's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3OLED's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
OLED leads on balance| Metric | MBLY | OLED |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -9% | 7% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 99.4% | 39.5% |
| Gross margin | 47.4% | 75.3% |
| Operating margin | -19.2% | 34.1% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -40.4% | 11.4% |
| Debt to equity | 0 | 0.01 |
Performance
OLED leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | MBLY | OLED |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 4% | 8.5% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -4.9% | 5.1% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -16.9% | 0.6% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -7.2% | -17.1% |
| Year to date | -30.1% | -29.7% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -49.7% | -45.3% |
Technicals
OLED has the stronger structure| Metric | MBLY | OLED |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 47.8 | 61.3 |
| ADX (14) | 32 | 18.3 |
| Price vs 50-day | -12.7% | 3.5% |
| Price vs 200-day | -16.3% | -12.1% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 40% | 45.8% |
Risk
MBLY is the more resilient| Metric | MBLY | OLED |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.12 | 1.42 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.96 | -1.3 |
| Sortino ratio | -1.52 | -1.86 |
| Max drawdown | -56.3% | -51.8% |
| Current drawdown | -51.4% | -45.8% |
| Annualized volatility | 56.1% | 42.3% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -5% | -4.3% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, MBLY or OLED?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, OLED is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 64 against MBLY's 45. The edge comes from momentum and value. MBLY is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is MBLY or OLED the better buy right now?
OLED carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor OLED over MBLY?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. OLED leads Momentum by 27 points; OLED leads Value by 25 points; OLED leads Quality by 20 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, MBLY or OLED?
Analyst price targets imply +62.5% upside for MBLY and +42.6% for OLED, so the Street currently favors MBLY. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors OLED. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, MBLY or OLED?
OLED is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. OLED on the peer-relative Value factor, by 25 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, MBLY or OLED?
MBLY on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, MBLY or OLED?
OLED on the Momentum factor, by 27 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, MBLY or OLED?
MBLY is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. MBLY on Risk Resilience, by 4 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is MBLY more profitable than OLED?
OLED leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 47.4% vs 75.3%; operating margin -19.2% vs 34.1%; ttm roe -40.4% vs 11.4%.
Is OLED's lead over MBLY getting stronger or weaker?
OLED lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 13 to 19 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the MBLY vs OLED verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: MBLY closes the Momentum gap — currently 27 points behind, the largest single contributor to OLED's edge; MBLY's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; OLED's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about MBLY and OLED?
MBLY: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. OLED: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on MBLY is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On OLED it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare MBLY and OLED with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.