MNDY vs TRMB Stock Comparison
Compare MNDY and TRMB across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between MNDY and TRMB?
TRMB leads the current stock comparison as Trimble Inc., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
monday.com Ltd. vs Trimble Inc.
TRMB leads
TRMB leads by 1 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Risk Resilience.
Fragile: 2 of 6 evidence groups support TRMB.
monday.com Ltd.
Trimble Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors TRMB over MNDY, 55 versus 54 as of Sep 11, 2026. TRMB's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and risk resilience, while MNDY holds the stronger quality profile. TRMB also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor TRMB today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. TRMB lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 1 points over 30 sessions.
Compare monday.com Ltd. and Trimble Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare MNDY and TRMB against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum30 vs 43TRMB +13
- Quality67 vs 56MNDY +11
- Risk Resilience46 vs 52TRMB +6
- Value65 vs 67Even
2 of 6 evidence groups favor TRMB. TRMB’s edge is concentrated in momentum and risk resilience; MNDY keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum +4
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum -4
No new signals fired.
TRMB's lead narrowed by 2 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — MNDY and TRMB both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
TRMB (Trimble Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and risk resilience.
MNDY (monday.com Ltd.): the counter-case, on quality — but at materially higher volatility, 78.4% against 30.7%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
TRMBTRMB on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
TRMBTRMB on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
TRMBTRMB on the Momentum factor, by 13 points.
Lower downside
TRMBTRMB on Risk Resilience, by 6 points.
Analyst upside
TRMBTRMB on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | MNDY | TRMB | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +22.5% | +27.5% | TRMB has more room |
| Target dispersion | +75.2% | +25.9% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 12 | 4 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor TRMB. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 54 vs 55 |
| Fundamentals | Even | revenue growth 3.8% vs 3.4%; EPS growth -86.3% vs -5.8%; TTM ROE 12.5% vs -1.9%; gross margin 88.7% vs 68.4%; operating margin 2.9% vs 17.5% |
| Valuation | Even | Value 65 vs 67 |
| Technicals | Even | Price vs 50-day 0.1% vs 2.1%; vs 200-day -9.4% vs -11.9% |
| Risk Resilience | TRMB | Risk Resilience 46 vs 52 |
| Analyst expectations | TRMB | Target upside 22.5% vs 27.5% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of MNDY and TRMB and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on TRMB.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10TRMB lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 1 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- TRMB +1
- 54 vs 55
- 7 sessions ago
- MNDY +1
- 62 vs 61
- 30 sessions ago
- Level
- 61 vs 61
- 90 sessions ago
- MNDY +1
- 64 vs 63
The lead changed hands 6 times in this window, most recently on Sep 8 when TRMB moved ahead of MNDY.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
0 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (8.30%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (6.51%)
0 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (14.30%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +1.96%, AIQ +1 points).
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +1.44%, AIQ -1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1MNDY closes the Momentum gap — currently 13 points behind, the largest single contributor to TRMB's edge.
- 2MNDY's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3TRMB starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | MNDY | TRMB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 3.8% | 3.4% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -86.3% | -5.8% |
| Gross margin | 88.7% | 68.4% |
| Operating margin | 2.9% | 17.5% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 12.5% | -1.9% |
| Debt to equity | 0.38 | 0.29 |
Performance
TRMB leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | MNDY | TRMB |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -9.8% | -3.8% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -0.9% | 0.9% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 4.2% | 12.3% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 12% | -15.9% |
| Year to date | -42.3% | -27.5% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -55.3% | -30.1% |
Technicals
Split| Metric | MNDY | TRMB |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 43.1 | 37.5 |
| ADX (14) | 15.6 | 20 |
| Price vs 50-day | 0.1% | 2.1% |
| Price vs 200-day | -9.4% | -11.9% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 78.4% | 30.7% |
Risk
TRMB is the more resilient| Metric | MNDY | TRMB |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.73 | 1.14 |
| Sharpe ratio | -1.01 | -1.03 |
| Sortino ratio | -1.5 | -1.44 |
| Max drawdown | -73.2% | -41.5% |
| Current drawdown | -61.1% | -31.9% |
| Annualized volatility | 64.5% | 32% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -6.2% | -3.5% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, MNDY or TRMB?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, TRMB is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 55 against MNDY's 54. The edge comes from momentum and risk resilience. MNDY is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is MNDY or TRMB the better buy right now?
TRMB carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor TRMB over MNDY?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. TRMB leads Momentum by 13 points; MNDY leads Quality by 11 points; TRMB leads Risk Resilience by 6 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, MNDY or TRMB?
Analyst price targets imply +22.5% upside for MNDY and +27.5% for TRMB, so the Street currently favors TRMB. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, MNDY or TRMB?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, MNDY or TRMB?
TRMB on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, MNDY or TRMB?
TRMB on the Momentum factor, by 13 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, MNDY or TRMB?
TRMB is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. TRMB on Risk Resilience, by 6 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is MNDY more profitable than TRMB?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 88.7% vs 68.4%; operating margin 2.9% vs 17.5%; ttm roe 12.5% vs -1.9%. MNDY leads on two measures and TRMB on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is TRMB's lead over MNDY getting stronger or weaker?
TRMB lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 1 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 6 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-08, when TRMB moved ahead of MNDY.
What would change the MNDY vs TRMB verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: MNDY closes the Momentum gap — currently 13 points behind, the largest single contributor to TRMB's edge; MNDY's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; TRMB starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about MNDY and TRMB?
MNDY: 0 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral. TRMB: 0 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral. The most decision-relevant rule on MNDY is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On TRMB it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare MNDY and TRMB with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.