MOD vs PRIM Stock Comparison
Compare MOD and PRIM across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between MOD and PRIM?
PRIM leads the current stock comparison as Primoris Services Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Modine Manufacturing Company vs Primoris Services Corporation
PRIM leads
PRIM leads by 1 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Risk Resilience.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support PRIM, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Modine Manufacturing Company
Primoris Services Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors PRIM over MOD, 41 versus 40 as of Sep 6, 2026. PRIM's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and risk resilience, while MOD holds the stronger quality profile. PRIM also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor PRIM today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. PRIM lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 1 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Modine Manufacturing Company and Primoris Services Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare MOD and PRIM against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value30%44 vs 64PRIM +20
- Quality30%44 vs 32MOD +12
- Momentum25%34 vs 25MOD +9
- Risk Resilience15%36 vs 41PRIM +5
3 of 6 evidence groups favor PRIM. PRIM’s edge is concentrated in value and risk resilience; MOD keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-05, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-04.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
PRIM's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — MOD and PRIM both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
PRIM (Primoris Services Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and risk resilience.
MOD (Modine Manufacturing Company): the counter-case, on quality, momentum, fundamentals — but at materially higher volatility, 52.5% against 37%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
PRIMPRIM on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value at 30% each.
Growth
MODMOD on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
PRIMPRIM on the peer-relative Value factor, by 20 points.
Momentum
MODMOD on the Momentum factor, by 9 points.
Lower downside
PRIMPRIM on Risk Resilience, by 5 points.
Analyst upside
PRIMPRIM on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | MOD | PRIM | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +75% | +92.6% | PRIM has more room |
| Target dispersion | +37% | +78.1% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 7 | 8 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor PRIM. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 40 vs 41 |
| Fundamentals | MODon balance | revenue growth -8.4% vs 8.2%; TTM ROE 12.6% vs 8.5%; gross margin 22.2% vs 8.6%; operating margin 10.3% vs 3% — MOD takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | PRIM | Value 44 vs 64 |
| Technicals | MOD | Price vs 50-day -8.7% vs -11%; vs 200-day -7.5% vs -39.9% |
| Risk Resilience | PRIM | Risk Resilience 36 vs 41 |
| Analyst expectations | PRIM | Target upside 75% vs 92.6% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of MOD and PRIM and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Signal direction runs against the verdict: the leader is net-bearish while the laggard is net-bullish. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on PRIM.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Apr 24 – Sep 5PRIM lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 1 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- PRIM +1
- 40 vs 41
- 7 sessions ago
- PRIM +1
- 39 vs 40
- 30 sessions ago
- Level
- 44 vs 44
- 90 sessions ago
- PRIM +8
- 36 vs 44
The lead changed hands 10 times in this window, most recently on Aug 26 when PRIM moved ahead of MOD.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (1.26%)
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (5.99%)
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (48.08%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (4.98%)
PRIM leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +4.3%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +1.14%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1MOD closes the Value gap — currently 20 points behind, the largest single contributor to PRIM's edge.
- 2MOD's ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3PRIM's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — the composite weights Quality and Value at 30% each, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
MOD leads on balance| Metric | MOD | PRIM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -8.4% | 8.2% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 0.7% | -240.6% |
| Gross margin | 22.2% | 8.6% |
| Operating margin | 10.3% | 3% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 12.6% | 8.5% |
| Debt to equity | 0.56 | 0.69 |
Performance
MOD leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | MOD | PRIM |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 9.6% | 1.8% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -0.5% | -9.9% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -29.6% | -38.9% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 3.9% | -44.1% |
| Year to date | 45.8% | -40% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 45.5% | -35.4% |
Technicals
MOD has the stronger structure| Metric | MOD | PRIM |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 34.8 | 30 |
| ADX (14) | 23.6 | 28.1 |
| Price vs 50-day | -8.7% | -11% |
| Price vs 200-day | -7.5% | -39.9% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 52.5% | 37% |
Risk
PRIM is the more resilient| Metric | MOD | PRIM |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.88 | 1.94 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.81 | -0.14 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.15 | -0.13 |
| Max drawdown | -42.1% | -64.5% |
| Current drawdown | -36.6% | -63.3% |
| Annualized volatility | 69.7% | 79.3% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -7.4% | -5.6% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, MOD or PRIM?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, PRIM is the stronger of the two as of Sep 6, 2026, scoring 41 against MOD's 40. The edge comes from value and risk resilience. MOD is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is MOD or PRIM the better buy right now?
PRIM carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 6, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor PRIM over MOD?
The composite weights Quality at 30%, Value at 30%, Momentum at 25% and Risk Resilience at 15%. PRIM leads Value by 20 points; MOD leads Quality by 12 points; MOD leads Momentum by 9 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, MOD or PRIM?
Analyst price targets imply +75% upside for MOD and +92.6% for PRIM, so the Street currently favors PRIM. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, MOD or PRIM?
PRIM is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. PRIM on the peer-relative Value factor, by 20 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, MOD or PRIM?
MOD on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, MOD or PRIM?
MOD on the Momentum factor, by 9 points. Momentum carries 25% of the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, MOD or PRIM?
PRIM is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. PRIM on Risk Resilience, by 5 points. The Risk Resilience factor weights 15% of the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is MOD more profitable than PRIM?
MOD leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 22.2% vs 8.6%; operating margin 10.3% vs 3%; ttm roe 12.6% vs 8.5%.
Is PRIM's lead over MOD getting stronger or weaker?
PRIM lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 1 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-04-24 and 2026-09-05. The lead has changed hands 10 times in that window, most recently on 2026-08-26, when PRIM moved ahead of MOD.
What would change the MOD vs PRIM verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: MOD closes the Value gap — currently 20 points behind, the largest single contributor to PRIM's edge; MOD's ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; PRIM's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — the composite weights Quality and Value at 30% each, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about MOD and PRIM?
MOD: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. PRIM: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on MOD is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On PRIM it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare MOD and PRIM with others
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality (30%), Value (30%), Momentum (25%) and Risk (15%). Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.