MOD vs QXO Stock Comparison
MOD currently leads QXO in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 35 vs 34. The clearest difference is quality, while QXO has the stronger momentum profile.
What is the main difference between MOD and QXO?
MOD leads the current stock comparison as Modine Manufacturing Company, with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Modine Manufacturing Company vs QXO, Inc.
MOD leads
MOD leads by 1 AIQ points, primarily on Quality, but the lead has narrowed from 9 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support MOD, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Modine Manufacturing Company
QXO, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors MOD over QXO, 35 versus 34 as of Oct 22, 2026. MOD's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality, while QXO holds the stronger momentum profile. MOD also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor MOD today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. MOD lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 9 to 1 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Modine Manufacturing Company and QXO, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare MOD and QXO against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum13 vs 32QXO +19
- Quality44 vs 28MOD +16
- Value44 vs 41Even
- Risk Resilience36 vs 34Even
3 of 6 evidence groups favor MOD. MOD’s edge is concentrated in quality; QXO keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 6 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +2
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 6 active signals are unchanged.
MOD's lead narrowed by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — MOD and QXO both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
MOD (Modine Manufacturing Company): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality.
QXO (QXO, Inc.): the counter-case, on momentum.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
MODMOD on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
QXOQXO on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
QXOQXO on the Momentum factor, by 19 points.
Lower downside
QXOQXO carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
MODMOD on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | MOD | QXO | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +120.1% | +105.4% | MOD has more room |
| Target dispersion | +51% | +80.3% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 8 | 8 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor MOD. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 35 vs 34 |
| Fundamentals | MODon balance | revenue growth -8.4% vs 87.6%; TTM ROE 12.6% vs -5.1%; gross margin 22.2% vs 19.2%; operating margin 10.3% vs -2.3% — MOD takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | Even | Value 44 vs 41 |
| Technicals | MOD | Price vs 50-day -19% vs -17.6%; vs 200-day -30.9% vs -41.3% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 36 vs 34 |
| Analyst expectations | MOD | Target upside 120.1% vs 105.4% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of MOD and QXO and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on MOD.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20MOD lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 9 to 1 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- MOD +1
- 35 vs 34
- 7 sessions ago
- MOD +2
- 36 vs 34
- 30 sessions ago
- MOD +9
- 43 vs 34
- 90 sessions ago
- MOD +10
- 47 vs 37
The lead changed hands 5 times in this window, most recently on Aug 13 when MOD moved ahead of QXO.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 4 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only MOD
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
0 bullish / 4 bearish / 2 neutral
Only QXO
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- 52-Week Low Proximity — bearish, risk, long horizon (0.0%)
Both carry 4 more signals that do not separate them: Death Cross Active, ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode, Downtrend Structure Active, MACD Bearish Crossover.
MOD leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +2.09%, AIQ 0 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -1.43%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1QXO closes the Quality gap — currently 16 points behind, the largest single contributor to MOD's edge.
- 2QXO's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3MOD's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 4 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 8 points over 30 sessions, and a further 1-point move would eliminate MOD's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
MOD leads on balance| Metric | MOD | QXO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -8.4% | 87.6% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 0.7% | 79.5% |
| Gross margin | 22.2% | 19.2% |
| Operating margin | 10.3% | -2.3% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 12.6% | -5.1% |
| Debt to equity | 0.56 | 0.68 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | MOD | QXO |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -15% | -5.1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -23.7% | -18.2% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -40.1% | -24.5% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -39.2% | -53.5% |
| Year to date | 9.9% | -44.8% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -8.1% | -44.7% |
Technicals
MOD has the stronger structure| Metric | MOD | QXO |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 25.7 | 38.9 |
| ADX (14) | 23.9 | 19.4 |
| Price vs 50-day | -19% | -17.6% |
| Price vs 200-day | -30.9% | -41.3% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 65.7% | 60.7% |
Risk
Split| Metric | MOD | QXO |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 3.03 | 2.75 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.23 | -0.68 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.32 | -1.32 |
| Max drawdown | -52.2% | -62.5% |
| Current drawdown | -52.2% | -61.4% |
| Annualized volatility | 70.8% | 64% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -7.7% | -6.3% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, MOD or QXO?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, MOD is the stronger of the two as of Oct 22, 2026, scoring 35 against QXO's 34. The edge comes from quality. QXO is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is MOD or QXO the better buy right now?
MOD carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 22, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor MOD over QXO?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. QXO leads Momentum by 19 points; MOD leads Quality by 16 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, MOD or QXO?
Analyst price targets imply +120.1% upside for MOD and +105.4% for QXO, so the Street currently favors MOD. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, MOD or QXO?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, MOD or QXO?
QXO on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, MOD or QXO?
QXO on the Momentum factor, by 19 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, MOD or QXO?
QXO is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. QXO carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is MOD more profitable than QXO?
MOD leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 22.2% vs 19.2%; operating margin 10.3% vs -2.3%; ttm roe 12.6% vs -5.1%.
Is MOD's lead over QXO getting stronger or weaker?
MOD lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 9 to 1 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 5 times in that window, most recently on 2026-08-13, when MOD moved ahead of QXO.
What would change the MOD vs QXO verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: QXO closes the Quality gap — currently 16 points behind, the largest single contributor to MOD's edge; QXO's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; MOD's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 4 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 8 points over 30 sessions, and a further 1-point move would eliminate MOD's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about MOD and QXO?
MOD: 1 bullish / 4 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. QXO: 0 bullish / 4 bearish / 2 neutral. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on MOD is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On QXO it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare MOD and QXO with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.