MSCI vs TRMB Stock Comparison
MSCI currently leads TRMB in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 56 vs 49. The clearest difference is momentum, while TRMB has the stronger value profile.
What is the main difference between MSCI and TRMB?
MSCI leads the current stock comparison as MSCI Inc., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
MSCI Inc. vs Trimble Inc.
MSCI leads
MSCI leads by 7 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Risk Resilience, having only recently taken the lead back from TRMB. Wall Street currently favors TRMB on target upside.
Fragile: 4 of 6 evidence groups support MSCI, the lead recently changed hands, and its current signal state is conflicted.
MSCI Inc.
Trimble Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors MSCI over TRMB, 56 versus 49 as of Nov 7, 2026. MSCI's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and risk resilience, while TRMB holds the stronger value profile. MSCI also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors TRMB. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor MSCI today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. MSCI lead: Reversed — TRMB led by 8 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; MSCI now leads by 7.
Compare MSCI Inc. and Trimble Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare MSCI and TRMB against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum94 vs 26MSCI +68
- Value24 vs 67TRMB +43
- Risk Resilience47 vs 40MSCI +7
- Quality60 vs 56MSCI +4
4 of 6 evidence groups favor MSCI. MSCI’s edge is concentrated in momentum and risk resilience; TRMB keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-11-06, compared against the prior scored session 2026-11-05.
Largest factor move: Momentum +1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
New signals
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (0.08%)
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum -1
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
MSCI's lead widened by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — MSCI and TRMB both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
MSCI (MSCI Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and risk resilience.
TRMB (Trimble Inc.): the counter-case, on value, valuation, analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 47.1% against 36.2%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
MSCIMSCI on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
MSCIMSCI on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
TRMBTRMB on the peer-relative Value factor, by 43 points.
Momentum
MSCIMSCI on the Momentum factor, by 68 points.
Lower downside
MSCIMSCI on Risk Resilience, by 7 points.
Analyst upside
TRMBTRMB on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors MSCI, analyst targets favor TRMB. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | MSCI | TRMB | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +8.4% | +34% | TRMB has more room |
| Target dispersion | +20.9% | +26.2% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 10 | 4 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor MSCI. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | MSCI | 56 vs 49 |
| Fundamentals | MSCIon balance | revenue growth 2.9% vs 3.4%; EPS growth 3.6% vs -5.8%; TTM ROE -49.7% vs -1.9%; gross margin 82.9% vs 68.4%; operating margin 55.7% vs 17.5% — MSCI takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | TRMB | Value 24 vs 67 |
| Technicals | MSCI | Price vs 50-day 11.4% vs -9.3%; vs 200-day 11.5% vs -10.5% |
| Risk Resilience | MSCI | Risk Resilience 47 vs 40 |
| Analyst expectations | TRMB | Target upside 8.4% vs 34% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of MSCI and TRMB and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 7 points.
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on MSCI.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jul 8 – Nov 6MSCI lead: Reversed — TRMB led by 8 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; MSCI now leads by 7.
- Today
- MSCI +7
- 56 vs 49
- 7 sessions ago
- TRMB +9
- 56 vs 65
- 30 sessions ago
- TRMB +8
- 55 vs 63
- 90 sessions ago
- TRMB +12
- 49 vs 61
The lead changed hands once in this window, most recently on Nov 4 when MSCI moved ahead of TRMB.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
5 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
Only MSCI
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (0.08%)
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
0 bullish / 4 bearish / 1 neutral
Only TRMB
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (1.35%)
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (4.13%)
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
MSCI leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -2.27%, AIQ 0 points).
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +0.88%, AIQ -1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1TRMB closes the Momentum gap — currently 68 points behind, the largest single contributor to MSCI's edge.
- 2TRMB's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3MSCI's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 5 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
MSCI leads on balance| Metric | MSCI | TRMB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 2.9% | 3.4% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 3.6% | -5.8% |
| Gross margin | 82.9% | 68.4% |
| Operating margin | 55.7% | 17.5% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -49.7% | -1.9% |
| Debt to equity | -2.28 | 0.29 |
Performance
MSCI leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | MSCI | TRMB |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 2.8% | -15.7% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 13.4% | -10% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 13.8% | -7.4% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 9.5% | -11% |
| Year to date | 11.7% | -30.9% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 12.1% | -32.8% |
Technicals
MSCI has the stronger structure| Metric | MSCI | TRMB |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 70.9 | 36.1 |
| ADX (14) | 32.1 | 37.2 |
| Price vs 50-day | 11.4% | -9.3% |
| Price vs 200-day | 11.5% | -10.5% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 36.2% | 47.1% |
Risk
MSCI is the more resilient| Metric | MSCI | TRMB |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.38 | 0.79 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.35 | -0.96 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.46 | -1.08 |
| Max drawdown | -18.1% | -41.5% |
| Current drawdown | -4.9% | -35.2% |
| Annualized volatility | 29.8% | 36.3% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.5% | -3.5% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, MSCI or TRMB?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, MSCI is the stronger of the two as of Nov 7, 2026, scoring 56 against TRMB's 49. The edge comes from momentum and risk resilience. TRMB is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is MSCI or TRMB the better buy right now?
MSCI carries the stronger systematic profile as of Nov 7, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor MSCI over TRMB?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. MSCI leads Momentum by 68 points; TRMB leads Value by 43 points; MSCI leads Risk Resilience by 7 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, MSCI or TRMB?
Analyst price targets imply +8.4% upside for MSCI and +34% for TRMB, so the Street currently favors TRMB. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors MSCI. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, MSCI or TRMB?
TRMB is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. TRMB on the peer-relative Value factor, by 43 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, MSCI or TRMB?
MSCI on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, MSCI or TRMB?
MSCI on the Momentum factor, by 68 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, MSCI or TRMB?
MSCI is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. MSCI on Risk Resilience, by 7 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is MSCI more profitable than TRMB?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 82.9% vs 68.4%; operating margin 55.7% vs 17.5%; ttm roe -49.7% vs -1.9%. MSCI leads on two measures and TRMB on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is MSCI's lead over TRMB getting stronger or weaker?
MSCI lead: Reversed — TRMB led by 8 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; MSCI now leads by 7. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-07-08 and 2026-11-06. The lead has changed hands once in that window, most recently on 2026-11-04, when MSCI moved ahead of TRMB.
What would change the MSCI vs TRMB verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: TRMB closes the Momentum gap — currently 68 points behind, the largest single contributor to MSCI's edge; TRMB's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; MSCI's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 5 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about MSCI and TRMB?
MSCI: 5 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. TRMB: 0 bullish / 4 bearish / 1 neutral. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on MSCI is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On TRMB it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare MSCI and TRMB with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.