MTSI vs POWI Stock Comparison
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. vs Power Integrations, Inc.
POWI leads
POWI leads by 2 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Risk Resilience, having only recently taken the lead back from MTSI.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support POWI, the lead recently changed hands, and its current signal state is conflicted.
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
Power Integrations, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors POWI over MTSI, 44 versus 42 as of Sep 5, 2026. POWI's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and risk resilience, while MTSI holds the stronger quality profile. POWI also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor POWI today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. POWI lead: Reversed — MTSI led by 6 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; POWI now leads by 2.
Compare MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. and Power Integrations, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Compare MTSI and POWI against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value30%25 vs 43POWI +18
- Quality30%69 vs 58MTSI +11
- Risk Resilience15%41 vs 52POWI +11
- Momentum25%30 vs 24MTSI +6
3 of 6 evidence groups favor POWI. POWI’s edge is concentrated in value and risk resilience; MTSI keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-04, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-03.
Largest factor move: Momentum +10
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience +3
No new signals fired.
POWI's lead narrowed by 3 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — MTSI and POWI both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
POWI (Power Integrations, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and risk resilience.
MTSI (MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.): the counter-case, on quality, momentum, fundamentals — but at materially higher volatility, 62.1% against 42.8%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
POWIPOWI on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value at 30% each.
Growth
POWIPOWI on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
POWIPOWI on the peer-relative Value factor, by 18 points.
Momentum
MTSIMTSI on the Momentum factor, by 6 points.
Lower downside
POWIPOWI on Risk Resilience, by 11 points.
Analyst upside
POWIPOWI on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | MTSI | POWI | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +44.5% | +68.5% | POWI has more room |
| Target dispersion | +45% | +11.8% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 8 | 2 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor POWI. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 42 vs 44 |
| Fundamentals | MTSIon balance | revenue growth 18.4% vs 9.8%; EPS growth 112.9% vs 203%; TTM ROE 17.1% vs 3.7%; gross margin 56.6% vs 53.6%; operating margin 18.1% vs 7.9% — MTSI takes 4 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | POWI | Value 25 vs 43 |
| Technicals | MTSI | Price vs 50-day -6.8% vs -20.7%; vs 200-day 2% vs -10.5% |
| Risk Resilience | POWI | Risk Resilience 41 vs 52 |
| Analyst expectations | POWI | Target upside 44.5% vs 68.5% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of MTSI and POWI and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on POWI.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Apr 23 – Sep 4POWI lead: Reversed — MTSI led by 6 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; POWI now leads by 2.
- Today
- POWI +2
- 42 vs 44
- 7 sessions ago
- MTSI +2
- 43 vs 41
- 30 sessions ago
- MTSI +6
- 53 vs 47
- 90 sessions ago
- POWI +8
- 43 vs 51
The lead changed hands once in this window, most recently on Sep 1 when POWI moved ahead of MTSI.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (9.47%)
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (5.75%)
2 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (12.91%)
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (5.91%)
POWI leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +3.46%, AIQ +3 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.18%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1MTSI closes the Value gap — currently 18 points behind, the largest single contributor to POWI's edge.
- 2MTSI's ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3POWI's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — the composite weights Quality and Value at 30% each, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
MTSI leads on balance| Metric | MTSI | POWI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 18.4% | 9.8% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 112.9% | 203% |
| Gross margin | 56.6% | 53.6% |
| Operating margin | 18.1% | 7.9% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 17.1% | 3.7% |
| Debt to equity | 0.24 | 0 |
Performance
MTSI leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | MTSI | POWI |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 1.4% | -2.1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -13.5% | -21.9% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -22.1% | -34.5% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 29.6% | 9.5% |
| Year to date | 57% | 42% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 106.6% | 14.9% |
Technicals
MTSI has the stronger structure| Metric | MTSI | POWI |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 25.9 | 17.8 |
| ADX (14) | 19.7 | 32.8 |
| Price vs 50-day | -6.8% | -20.7% |
| Price vs 200-day | 2% | -10.5% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 62.1% | 42.8% |
Risk
POWI is the more resilient| Metric | MTSI | POWI |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.24 | 2.35 |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.43 | 0.44 |
| Sortino ratio | 2.15 | 0.71 |
| Max drawdown | -44.2% | -43% |
| Current drawdown | -34.4% | -42.2% |
| Annualized volatility | 60% | 63.2% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -6.7% | -6.5% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, MTSI or POWI?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, POWI is the stronger of the two as of Sep 5, 2026, scoring 44 against MTSI's 42. The edge comes from value and risk resilience. MTSI is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is MTSI or POWI the better buy right now?
POWI carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 5, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor POWI over MTSI?
The composite weights Quality at 30%, Value at 30%, Momentum at 25% and Risk Resilience at 15%. POWI leads Value by 18 points; MTSI leads Quality by 11 points; POWI leads Risk Resilience by 11 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, MTSI or POWI?
Analyst price targets imply +44.5% upside for MTSI and +68.5% for POWI, so the Street currently favors POWI. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, MTSI or POWI?
POWI is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. POWI on the peer-relative Value factor, by 18 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, MTSI or POWI?
POWI on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, MTSI or POWI?
MTSI on the Momentum factor, by 6 points. Momentum carries 25% of the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, MTSI or POWI?
POWI is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. POWI on Risk Resilience, by 11 points. The Risk Resilience factor weights 15% of the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is MTSI more profitable than POWI?
MTSI leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 56.6% vs 53.6%; operating margin 18.1% vs 7.9%; ttm roe 17.1% vs 3.7%.
Is POWI's lead over MTSI getting stronger or weaker?
POWI lead: Reversed — MTSI led by 6 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; POWI now leads by 2. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-04-23 and 2026-09-04. The lead has changed hands once in that window, most recently on 2026-09-01, when POWI moved ahead of MTSI.
What would change the MTSI vs POWI verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: MTSI closes the Value gap — currently 18 points behind, the largest single contributor to POWI's edge; MTSI's ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; POWI's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — the composite weights Quality and Value at 30% each, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about MTSI and POWI?
MTSI: 2 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. POWI: 2 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on MTSI is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On POWI it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare MTSI and POWI with others
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality (30%), Value (30%), Momentum (25%) and Risk (15%). Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.