NBIS vs SDGR Stock Comparison
Compare NBIS and SDGR across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between NBIS and SDGR?
SDGR leads the current stock comparison as Schrödinger, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Nebius Group N.V. vs Schrödinger, Inc.
SDGR leads
SDGR leads by 5 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Quality. Wall Street currently favors NBIS on target upside.
Fragile: 2 of 6 evidence groups support SDGR, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Nebius Group N.V.
Schrödinger, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors SDGR over NBIS, 52 versus 47 as of Sep 11, 2026. SDGR's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and quality, while NBIS holds the stronger momentum profile. SDGR also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors NBIS. 2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SDGR today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. SDGR lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 5 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Nebius Group N.V. and Schrödinger, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare NBIS and SDGR against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value34 vs 52SDGR +18
- Momentum70 vs 57NBIS +13
- Quality43 vs 51SDGR +8
- Risk Resilience44 vs 43Even
2 of 6 evidence groups favor SDGR. SDGR’s edge is concentrated in value and quality; NBIS keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -5
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum -1
No new signals fired.
SDGR's lead widened by 1 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — NBIS and SDGR both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
SDGR (Schrödinger, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and quality.
NBIS (Nebius Group N.V.): the counter-case, on momentum, fundamentals, technicals — but at materially higher volatility, 80.9% against 69.8%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
SDGRSDGR on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
SDGRSDGR on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
SDGRSDGR on the peer-relative Value factor, by 18 points.
Momentum
NBISNBIS on the Momentum factor, by 13 points.
Lower downside
SDGRSDGR carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
NBISNBIS on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors SDGR, analyst targets favor NBIS. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | NBIS | SDGR | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +9.6% | -0.1% | NBIS has more room |
| Target dispersion | +114.2% | 0% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 8 | 1 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SDGR. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | SDGR | 47 vs 52 |
| Fundamentals | NBISon balance | EPS growth -128.3% vs 109.9%; gross margin 58.6% vs 56.9%; operating margin -49.3% vs -59.2% — NBIS takes 2 of 3 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | SDGR | Value 34 vs 52 |
| Technicals | NBIS | Price vs 50-day 6% vs 8.7%; vs 200-day 45.3% vs 24.2% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 44 vs 43 |
| Analyst expectations | NBIS | Target upside 9.6% vs -0.1% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of NBIS and SDGR and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on SDGR.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10SDGR lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 5 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- SDGR +5
- 47 vs 52
- 7 sessions ago
- SDGR +16
- 40 vs 56
- 30 sessions ago
- SDGR +6
- 52 vs 58
- 90 sessions ago
- SDGR +22
- 35 vs 57
The lead changed hands once in this window, most recently on May 20 when SDGR moved ahead of NBIS.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
4 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (34.89%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
3 bullish / 1 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (15.61%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
SDGR leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -1.56%, AIQ -1 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +1.17%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1NBIS closes the Value gap — currently 18 points behind, the largest single contributor to SDGR's edge.
- 2NBIS's existing bullish trend signals translate into factor-score gains — the rules are already firing, but the scores have not yet followed.
- 3SDGR's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
NBIS leads on balance| Metric | NBIS | SDGR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 45.9% | 0.5% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -128.3% | 109.9% |
| Gross margin | 58.6% | 56.9% |
| Operating margin | -49.3% | -59.2% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 0.9% | -16.4% |
| Debt to equity | 0.97 | 0.33 |
Performance
NBIS leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | NBIS | SDGR |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 11.8% | -10% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -12% | 0.9% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 7.8% | 32.9% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 103.7% | 47.7% |
| Year to date | 172.5% | 5.1% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 256.1% | -3.3% |
Technicals
NBIS has the stronger structure| Metric | NBIS | SDGR |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 53.6 | 45.2 |
| ADX (14) | 11.2 | 32.8 |
| Price vs 50-day | 6% | 8.7% |
| Price vs 200-day | 45.3% | 24.2% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 80.9% | 69.8% |
Risk
Split| Metric | NBIS | SDGR |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 3.55 | 1.59 |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.29 | 0.14 |
| Sortino ratio | 2.49 | 0.23 |
| Max drawdown | -48.3% | -50.8% |
| Current drawdown | -20.4% | -16.5% |
| Annualized volatility | 108.9% | 55.1% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -9.4% | -5.3% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, NBIS or SDGR?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, SDGR is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 52 against NBIS's 47. The edge comes from value and quality. NBIS is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is NBIS or SDGR the better buy right now?
SDGR carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor SDGR over NBIS?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. SDGR leads Value by 18 points; NBIS leads Momentum by 13 points; SDGR leads Quality by 8 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, NBIS or SDGR?
Analyst price targets imply +9.6% upside for NBIS and -0.1% for SDGR, so the Street currently favors NBIS. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors SDGR. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, NBIS or SDGR?
SDGR is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. SDGR on the peer-relative Value factor, by 18 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, NBIS or SDGR?
SDGR on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, NBIS or SDGR?
NBIS on the Momentum factor, by 13 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, NBIS or SDGR?
SDGR is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. SDGR carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is NBIS more profitable than SDGR?
NBIS leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 58.6% vs 56.9%; operating margin -49.3% vs -59.2%; ttm roe 0.9% vs -16.4%.
Is SDGR's lead over NBIS getting stronger or weaker?
SDGR lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 5 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands once in that window, most recently on 2026-05-20, when SDGR moved ahead of NBIS.
What would change the NBIS vs SDGR verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: NBIS closes the Value gap — currently 18 points behind, the largest single contributor to SDGR's edge; NBIS's existing bullish trend signals translate into factor-score gains — the rules are already firing, but the scores have not yet followed; SDGR's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about NBIS and SDGR?
NBIS: 4 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. SDGR: 3 bullish / 1 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on NBIS is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On SDGR it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare NBIS and SDGR with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.