NDAQ vs SPGI Stock Comparison
Compare NDAQ and SPGI across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between NDAQ and SPGI?
SPGI leads the current stock comparison as S&P Global Inc., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Nasdaq, Inc. vs S&P Global Inc.
SPGI leads
SPGI leads by 1 AIQ points, primarily on Quality.
Fragile: 0 of 6 evidence groups support SPGI.
Nasdaq, Inc.
S&P Global Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors SPGI over NDAQ, 43 versus 42 as of Sep 11, 2026. SPGI's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality, while NDAQ holds the stronger momentum profile. SPGI also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 0 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SPGI today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. SPGI lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 1 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Nasdaq, Inc. and S&P Global Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare NDAQ and SPGI against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality61 vs 68SPGI +7
- Momentum30 vs 25NDAQ +5
- Risk Resilience59 vs 57Even
- Value25 vs 26Even
0 of 6 evidence groups favor SPGI. SPGI’s edge is concentrated in quality; NDAQ keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -23
New signals
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum -10
No new signals fired.
The lead changed hands: SPGI moved ahead of NDAQ in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — NDAQ and SPGI both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
SPGI (S&P Global Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality.
NDAQ (Nasdaq, Inc.): the counter-case, on momentum, technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
SPGISPGI on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
NDAQNDAQ on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
NDAQNDAQ on the Momentum factor, by 5 points.
Lower downside
NDAQNDAQ carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
EvenAnalyst targets are level or not covered for both names.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | NDAQ | SPGI | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +24.1% | +24.7% | Level |
| Target dispersion | +8.8% | +3.1% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 5 | 4 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
0 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SPGI. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 42 vs 43 |
| Fundamentals | Even | EPS growth -2.2% vs -12.2%; TTM ROE 16.3% vs 15.5%; gross margin 59.4% vs 70.9%; operating margin 31.6% vs 46.3% |
| Valuation | Even | Value 25 vs 26 |
| Technicals | NDAQ | Price vs 50-day -2.7% vs -4.1%; vs 200-day 1.7% vs -8.3% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 59 vs 57 |
| Analyst expectations | Even | Target upside 24.1% vs 24.7% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of NDAQ and SPGI and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 0 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- Signal direction runs against the verdict: the leader is net-bearish while the laggard is net-bullish. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on SPGI.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10SPGI lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 1 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- SPGI +1
- 42 vs 43
- 7 sessions ago
- SPGI +6
- 50 vs 56
- 30 sessions ago
- SPGI +2
- 52 vs 54
- 90 sessions ago
- SPGI +14
- 42 vs 56
The lead changed hands 4 times in this window, most recently on Sep 10 when SPGI moved ahead of NDAQ.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
3 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (3.55%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
0 bullish / 3 bearish
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (4.53%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
NDAQ is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -0.89%, AIQ -6 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.07%, AIQ -3 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1NDAQ closes the Quality gap — currently 7 points behind, the largest single contributor to SPGI's edge.
- 2NDAQ's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3SPGI starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | NDAQ | SPGI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 18.5% | -0.6% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -2.2% | -12.2% |
| Gross margin | 59.4% | 70.9% |
| Operating margin | 31.6% | 46.3% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 16.3% | 15.5% |
| Debt to equity | 0.77 | 0.5 |
Performance
NDAQ leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | NDAQ | SPGI |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -3.9% | -4.9% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -3.8% | 0.1% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 6.1% | -3.7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 7.6% | -4.3% |
| Year to date | -5.3% | -21.5% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -3.1% | -24.8% |
Technicals
NDAQ has the stronger structure| Metric | NDAQ | SPGI |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 32.1 | 39 |
| ADX (14) | 23.8 | 18.1 |
| Price vs 50-day | -2.7% | -4.1% |
| Price vs 200-day | 1.7% | -8.3% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 21.6% | 32.1% |
Risk
Split| Metric | NDAQ | SPGI |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.65 | 0.34 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.11 | -0.92 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.14 | -1.08 |
| Max drawdown | -23.9% | -29.1% |
| Current drawdown | -8.9% | -25.5% |
| Annualized volatility | 27.8% | 30.5% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.7% | -3% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, NDAQ or SPGI?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, SPGI is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 43 against NDAQ's 42. The edge comes from quality. NDAQ is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is NDAQ or SPGI the better buy right now?
SPGI carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 0 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor SPGI over NDAQ?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. SPGI leads Quality by 7 points; NDAQ leads Momentum by 5 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, NDAQ or SPGI?
Analyst price targets imply +24.1% upside for NDAQ and +24.7% for SPGI. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, NDAQ or SPGI?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, NDAQ or SPGI?
NDAQ on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, NDAQ or SPGI?
NDAQ on the Momentum factor, by 5 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, NDAQ or SPGI?
NDAQ is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. NDAQ carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is NDAQ more profitable than SPGI?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 59.4% vs 70.9%; operating margin 31.6% vs 46.3%; ttm roe 16.3% vs 15.5%. NDAQ leads on one measure and SPGI on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is SPGI's lead over NDAQ getting stronger or weaker?
SPGI lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 1 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 4 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-10, when SPGI moved ahead of NDAQ.
What would change the NDAQ vs SPGI verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: NDAQ closes the Quality gap — currently 7 points behind, the largest single contributor to SPGI's edge; NDAQ's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; SPGI starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about NDAQ and SPGI?
NDAQ: 3 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. SPGI: 0 bullish / 3 bearish. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on NDAQ is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On SPGI it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare NDAQ and SPGI with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.