NHI vs OHI Stock Comparison
Compare NHI and OHI across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between NHI and OHI?
OHI leads the current stock comparison as Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
National Health Investors, Inc. vs Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc.
OHI leads
OHI leads by 10 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Quality, and the lead has widened from 0 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors NHI on target upside.
Stable: 4 of 6 evidence groups support OHI, its lead is widening, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
National Health Investors, Inc.
Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors OHI over NHI, 56 versus 46 as of Sep 11, 2026. OHI's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and quality. OHI also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors NHI. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor OHI today, and the comparison is rated Stable on stability. OHI lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 0 to 10 points over 30 sessions.
Compare National Health Investors, Inc. and Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare NHI and OHI against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum25 vs 51OHI +26
- Quality58 vs 65OHI +7
- Risk Resilience52 vs 57OHI +5
- Value48 vs 50Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor OHI. OHI’s edge is concentrated in momentum and quality.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
OHI's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — NHI and OHI both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
OHI (Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and quality.
NHI (National Health Investors, Inc.): the counter-case, on analyst expectations.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
OHIOHI on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
OHIOHI on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
OHIOHI on the Momentum factor, by 26 points.
Lower downside
OHIOHI on Risk Resilience, by 5 points.
Analyst upside
NHINHI on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors OHI, analyst targets favor NHI. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | NHI | OHI | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +14.9% | +7.3% | NHI has more room |
| Target dispersion | +9.9% | +19.8% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 4 | 8 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor OHI. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | OHI | 46 vs 56 |
| Fundamentals | OHIon balance | revenue growth 4.7% vs 3.9%; EPS growth 38.6% vs 157.4%; TTM ROE 11% vs 16.5%; gross margin 64.7% vs 72%; operating margin 45.4% vs 62.4% — OHI takes 4 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | Even | Value 48 vs 50 |
| Technicals | OHI | Price vs 50-day -6.2% vs -2.6%; vs 200-day -10.4% vs 1.2% |
| Risk Resilience | OHI | Risk Resilience 52 vs 57 |
| Analyst expectations | NHI | Target upside 14.9% vs 7.3% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of NHI and OHI and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion rests on a wide gap and broad agreement. It is unlikely to turn on a single session.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 10 points.
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on OHI.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10OHI lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 0 to 10 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- OHI +10
- 46 vs 56
- 7 sessions ago
- OHI +8
- 46 vs 54
- 30 sessions ago
- Level
- 49 vs 49
- 90 sessions ago
- OHI +2
- 59 vs 61
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 4 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (4.56%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (3.94%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
NHI is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.16%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.09%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1NHI closes the Momentum gap — currently 26 points behind, the largest single contributor to OHI's edge.
- 2NHI's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3OHI's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
OHI leads on balance| Metric | NHI | OHI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 4.7% | 3.9% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 38.6% | 157.4% |
| Gross margin | 64.7% | 72% |
| Operating margin | 45.4% | 62.4% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 11% | 16.5% |
| Debt to equity | 0.82 | 0.75 |
Performance
OHI leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | NHI | OHI |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -1.8% | -0.1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -0.7% | 2.4% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -3.5% | 2.4% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -17.6% | -2% |
| Year to date | -8.1% | 5.9% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -10.5% | 8.3% |
Technicals
OHI has the stronger structure| Metric | NHI | OHI |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 28.4 | 52.1 |
| ADX (14) | 32.4 | 22.4 |
| Price vs 50-day | -6.2% | -2.6% |
| Price vs 200-day | -10.4% | 1.2% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 17.1% | 14.5% |
Risk
OHI is the more resilient| Metric | NHI | OHI |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | -0.32 | -0.26 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.52 | 0.36 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.7 | 0.61 |
| Max drawdown | -24.9% | -11.9% |
| Current drawdown | -22.9% | -9.2% |
| Annualized volatility | 23.6% | 21% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.1% | -1.8% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, NHI or OHI?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, OHI is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 56 against NHI's 46. The edge comes from momentum and quality. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is NHI or OHI the better buy right now?
OHI carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Stable — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Stable rating means the gap is wide and the evidence is broad, so the conclusion is unlikely to turn on a single session.
Why does the AIQ Score favor OHI over NHI?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. OHI leads Momentum by 26 points; OHI leads Quality by 7 points; OHI leads Risk Resilience by 5 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, NHI or OHI?
Analyst price targets imply +14.9% upside for NHI and +7.3% for OHI, so the Street currently favors NHI. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors OHI. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, NHI or OHI?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, NHI or OHI?
OHI on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, NHI or OHI?
OHI on the Momentum factor, by 26 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, NHI or OHI?
OHI is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. OHI on Risk Resilience, by 5 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is NHI more profitable than OHI?
OHI leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 64.7% vs 72%; operating margin 45.4% vs 62.4%; ttm roe 11% vs 16.5%.
Is OHI's lead over NHI getting stronger or weaker?
OHI lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 0 to 10 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the NHI vs OHI verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: NHI closes the Momentum gap — currently 26 points behind, the largest single contributor to OHI's edge; NHI's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; OHI's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about NHI and OHI?
NHI: 1 bullish / 4 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. OHI: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on NHI is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On OHI it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare NHI and OHI with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.