NOK vs VIAV Stock Comparison
NOK currently leads VIAV in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 49 vs 42. The clearest difference is value.
What is the main difference between NOK and VIAV?
NOK leads the current stock comparison as Nokia Oyj, with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Nokia Oyj vs Viavi Solutions Inc.
NOK leads
NOK leads by 7 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Momentum, and the lead has widened from 3 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support NOK, its lead is widening, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Nokia Oyj
Viavi Solutions Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors NOK over VIAV, 49 versus 42 as of Oct 22, 2026. NOK's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and momentum. NOK also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor NOK today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. NOK lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 3 to 7 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Nokia Oyj and Viavi Solutions Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare NOK and VIAV against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value63 vs 47NOK +16
- Momentum30 vs 26NOK +4
- Quality52 vs 49Even
- Risk Resilience46 vs 45Even
3 of 6 evidence groups favor NOK. NOK’s edge is concentrated in value and momentum.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
NOK's lead was unchanged in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — NOK and VIAV both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
NOK (Nokia Oyj): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and momentum.
VIAV (Viavi Solutions Inc.): the counter-case, on fundamentals — but at materially higher volatility, 78.6% against 50.4%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
NOKNOK on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
VIAVVIAV on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
NOKNOK on the peer-relative Value factor, by 16 points.
Momentum
NOKNOK on the Momentum factor, by 4 points.
Lower downside
NOKNOK carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
NOKNOK on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | NOK | VIAV | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +89.2% | +79.9% | NOK has more room |
| Target dispersion | +28.6% | +9.4% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 2 | 3 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor NOK. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | NOK | 49 vs 42 |
| Fundamentals | VIAVon balance | revenue growth 7.1% vs 8.9%; EPS growth -98.1% vs 4.4%; TTM ROE 4.5% vs -3.2%; gross margin 44.6% vs 57.7%; operating margin 8.3% vs 6.9% — VIAV takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | NOK | Value 63 vs 47 |
| Technicals | Even | Price vs 50-day -9.5% vs -9.6%; vs 200-day -11% vs -8.9% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 46 vs 45 |
| Analyst expectations | NOK | Target upside 89.2% vs 79.9% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of NOK and VIAV and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 7 points.
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on NOK.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20NOK lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 3 to 7 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- NOK +7
- 49 vs 42
- 7 sessions ago
- NOK +6
- 50 vs 44
- 30 sessions ago
- NOK +3
- 56 vs 53
- 90 sessions ago
- NOK +3
- 58 vs 55
The lead changed hands 4 times in this window, most recently on Oct 14 when NOK moved ahead of VIAV.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
Only NOK
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
No signal that the other name lacks.
Both carry 4 more signals that do not separate them: Golden Cross Active, ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode, Keltner Channel Breakdown, MACD Bearish Crossover.
NOK leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +2.55%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +1.9%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1VIAV closes the Value gap — currently 16 points behind, the largest single contributor to NOK's edge.
- 2VIAV's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3NOK's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
VIAV leads on balance| Metric | NOK | VIAV |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 7.1% | 8.9% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -98.1% | 4.4% |
| Gross margin | 44.6% | 57.7% |
| Operating margin | 8.3% | 6.9% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 4.5% | -3.2% |
| Debt to equity | 0.16 | 0.48 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | NOK | VIAV |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -8.5% | -15.9% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -16.6% | -4.6% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -12.3% | -17.8% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -11.7% | -21.5% |
| Year to date | 39.4% | 94.9% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 59.9% | 161% |
Technicals
Split| Metric | NOK | VIAV |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 37.2 | 36.1 |
| ADX (14) | 17.5 | 22 |
| Price vs 50-day | -9.5% | -9.6% |
| Price vs 200-day | -11% | -8.9% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 50.4% | 78.6% |
Risk
Split| Metric | NOK | VIAV |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.23 | 2.3 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.96 | 1.59 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.61 | 2.64 |
| Max drawdown | -50.1% | -41.8% |
| Current drawdown | -46.5% | -37.2% |
| Annualized volatility | 64.1% | 78.5% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -5.5% | -8% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, NOK or VIAV?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, NOK is the stronger of the two as of Oct 22, 2026, scoring 49 against VIAV's 42. The edge comes from value and momentum. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is NOK or VIAV the better buy right now?
NOK carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 22, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor NOK over VIAV?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. NOK leads Value by 16 points; NOK leads Momentum by 4 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, NOK or VIAV?
Analyst price targets imply +89.2% upside for NOK and +79.9% for VIAV, so the Street currently favors NOK. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, NOK or VIAV?
NOK is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. NOK on the peer-relative Value factor, by 16 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, NOK or VIAV?
VIAV on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, NOK or VIAV?
NOK on the Momentum factor, by 4 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, NOK or VIAV?
NOK is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. NOK carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is NOK more profitable than VIAV?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 44.6% vs 57.7%; operating margin 8.3% vs 6.9%; ttm roe 4.5% vs -3.2%. NOK leads on two measures and VIAV on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is NOK's lead over VIAV getting stronger or weaker?
NOK lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 3 to 7 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 4 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-14, when NOK moved ahead of VIAV.
What would change the NOK vs VIAV verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: VIAV closes the Value gap — currently 16 points behind, the largest single contributor to NOK's edge; VIAV's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; NOK's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about NOK and VIAV?
NOK: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. VIAV: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on NOK is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On VIAV it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare NOK and VIAV with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.