NRG vs OGE Stock Comparison
Compare NRG and OGE across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between NRG and OGE?
OGE leads the current stock comparison as OGE Energy Corp., with the clearest separation coming from risk resilience and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
NRG Energy, Inc. vs OGE Energy Corp.
OGE leads
OGE leads by 5 AIQ points, primarily on Risk Resilience and Quality. Wall Street currently favors NRG on target upside.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support OGE, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
NRG Energy, Inc.
OGE Energy Corp.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors OGE over NRG, 49 versus 44 as of Sep 11, 2026. OGE's advantage is driven primarily by stronger risk resilience and quality, while NRG holds the stronger value profile. OGE also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors NRG. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor OGE today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. OGE lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 5 points over 30 sessions.
Compare NRG Energy, Inc. and OGE Energy Corp. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare NRG and OGE against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience34 vs 56OGE +22
- Value64 vs 49NRG +15
- Quality33 vs 46OGE +13
- Momentum40 vs 48OGE +8
4 of 6 evidence groups favor OGE. OGE’s edge is concentrated in risk resilience and quality; NRG keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum +1
New signals
- 52-Week Low Proximity — bearish, risk, long horizon (2.9%)
Largest factor move: Momentum -1
No new signals fired.
OGE's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — NRG and OGE both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
OGE (OGE Energy Corp.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by risk resilience and quality.
NRG (NRG Energy, Inc.): the counter-case, on value, valuation, analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 51.1% against 14.8%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
OGEOGE on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
OGEOGE on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
NRGNRG on the peer-relative Value factor, by 15 points.
Momentum
OGEOGE on the Momentum factor, by 8 points.
Lower downside
OGEOGE on Risk Resilience, by 22 points.
Analyst upside
NRGNRG on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors OGE, analyst targets favor NRG. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | NRG | OGE | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +72.9% | +8% | NRG has more room |
| Target dispersion | +36.7% | +13.9% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 10 | 5 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor OGE. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | OGE | 44 vs 49 |
| Fundamentals | OGEon balance | revenue growth 7.4% vs -5.4%; EPS growth 3.5% vs 133.3%; TTM ROE 25.4% vs 9.6%; gross margin 16.4% vs 53.6%; operating margin 5.4% vs 24.2% — OGE takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | NRG | Value 64 vs 49 |
| Technicals | OGE | Price vs 50-day -9.6% vs -2.2%; vs 200-day -23.5% vs 0.1% |
| Risk Resilience | OGE | Risk Resilience 34 vs 56 |
| Analyst expectations | NRG | Target upside 72.9% vs 8% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of NRG and OGE and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on OGE.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10OGE lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 5 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- OGE +5
- 44 vs 49
- 7 sessions ago
- OGE +3
- 45 vs 48
- 30 sessions ago
- OGE +7
- 41 vs 48
- 90 sessions ago
- OGE +6
- 47 vs 53
The lead changed hands 2 times in this window, most recently on Aug 4 when OGE moved ahead of NRG.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (16.26%)
- 52-Week Low Proximity — bearish, risk, long horizon (2.9%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (2.18%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
NRG is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +1.62%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.09%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1NRG closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 22 points behind, the largest single contributor to OGE's edge.
- 2NRG's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3OGE's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
OGE leads on balance| Metric | NRG | OGE |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 7.4% | -5.4% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 3.5% | 133.3% |
| Gross margin | 16.4% | 53.6% |
| Operating margin | 5.4% | 24.2% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 25.4% | 9.6% |
| Debt to equity | 4.83 | 1.17 |
Performance
OGE leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | NRG | OGE |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 0.5% | 0.3% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -7.5% | -0.7% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -7.5% | -2.2% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -24.9% | -1% |
| Year to date | -29.9% | 9.1% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -24.4% | 7.2% |
Technicals
OGE has the stronger structure| Metric | NRG | OGE |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 44.3 | 48.7 |
| ADX (14) | 17.4 | 13.8 |
| Price vs 50-day | -9.6% | -2.2% |
| Price vs 200-day | -23.5% | 0.1% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 51.1% | 14.8% |
Risk
OGE is the more resilient| Metric | NRG | OGE |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.4 | -0.04 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.47 | 0.22 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.65 | 0.34 |
| Max drawdown | -40.5% | -10.4% |
| Current drawdown | -39.3% | -6.7% |
| Annualized volatility | 48.9% | 16.9% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -5% | -1.8% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, NRG or OGE?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, OGE is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 49 against NRG's 44. The edge comes from risk resilience and quality. NRG is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is NRG or OGE the better buy right now?
OGE carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor OGE over NRG?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. OGE leads Risk Resilience by 22 points; NRG leads Value by 15 points; OGE leads Quality by 13 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, NRG or OGE?
Analyst price targets imply +72.9% upside for NRG and +8% for OGE, so the Street currently favors NRG. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors OGE. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, NRG or OGE?
NRG is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. NRG on the peer-relative Value factor, by 15 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, NRG or OGE?
OGE on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, NRG or OGE?
OGE on the Momentum factor, by 8 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, NRG or OGE?
OGE is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. OGE on Risk Resilience, by 22 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is NRG more profitable than OGE?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 16.4% vs 53.6%; operating margin 5.4% vs 24.2%; ttm roe 25.4% vs 9.6%. NRG leads on one measure and OGE on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is OGE's lead over NRG getting stronger or weaker?
OGE lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 5 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 2 times in that window, most recently on 2026-08-04, when OGE moved ahead of NRG.
What would change the NRG vs OGE verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: NRG closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 22 points behind, the largest single contributor to OGE's edge; NRG's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; OGE's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about NRG and OGE?
NRG: 1 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. OGE: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on NRG is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On OGE it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare NRG and OGE with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.