NUE vs SCCO Stock Comparison
Compare NUE and SCCO across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between NUE and SCCO?
NUE leads the current stock comparison as Nucor Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Nucor Corporation vs Southern Copper Corporation
NUE leads
NUE leads by 1 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Momentum, having only recently taken the lead back from SCCO.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support NUE, the lead recently changed hands, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
Nucor Corporation
Southern Copper Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors NUE over SCCO, 58 versus 57 as of Sep 11, 2026. NUE's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and momentum, while SCCO holds the stronger quality profile. NUE also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor NUE today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. NUE lead: Reversed — SCCO led by 13 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; NUE now leads by 1.
Compare Nucor Corporation and Southern Copper Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare NUE and SCCO against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality46 vs 88SCCO +42
- Value59 vs 32NUE +27
- Momentum77 vs 54NUE +23
- Risk Resilience51 vs 51Even
3 of 6 evidence groups favor NUE. NUE’s edge is concentrated in value and momentum; SCCO keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum +7
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum -13
No new signals fired.
The lead changed hands: NUE moved ahead of SCCO in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — NUE and SCCO both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
NUE (Nucor Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and momentum.
SCCO (Southern Copper Corporation): the counter-case, on quality, fundamentals — but at materially higher volatility, 57.8% against 35.3%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
NUENUE on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
NUENUE on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
NUENUE on the peer-relative Value factor, by 27 points.
Momentum
NUENUE on the Momentum factor, by 23 points.
Lower downside
NUENUE carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
NUENUE on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | NUE | SCCO | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +1.8% | -19% | NUE has more room |
| Target dispersion | +31.8% | +33.8% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Sell | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 8 | 6 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor NUE. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 58 vs 57 |
| Fundamentals | SCCOon balance | EPS growth 56.3% vs 4.7%; TTM ROE 13.5% vs 49.4%; gross margin 15.5% vs 62.3%; operating margin 11.5% vs 56.9% — SCCO takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | NUE | Value 59 vs 32 |
| Technicals | NUE | Price vs 50-day 3.7% vs 1.5%; vs 200-day 23% vs 9% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 51 vs 51 |
| Analyst expectations | NUE | Target upside 1.8% vs -19% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of NUE and SCCO and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has swung materially session to session. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on NUE.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10NUE lead: Reversed — SCCO led by 13 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; NUE now leads by 1.
- Today
- NUE +1
- 58 vs 57
- 7 sessions ago
- SCCO +6
- 53 vs 59
- 30 sessions ago
- SCCO +13
- 48 vs 61
- 90 sessions ago
- SCCO +9
- 41 vs 50
The lead changed hands 5 times in this window, most recently on Sep 10 when NUE moved ahead of SCCO.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
4 bullish / 0 bearish
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (20.46%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
3 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (7.04%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
SCCO is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +1.55%, AIQ +1 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -0.33%, AIQ -4 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1SCCO closes the Value gap — currently 27 points behind, the largest single contributor to NUE's edge.
- 2SCCO generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as MACD Bullish Crossover.
- 3NUE's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
SCCO leads on balance| Metric | NUE | SCCO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 9.5% | 0.9% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 56.3% | 4.7% |
| Gross margin | 15.5% | 62.3% |
| Operating margin | 11.5% | 56.9% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 13.5% | 49.4% |
| Debt to equity | 0.32 | 0.68 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | NUE | SCCO |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -3.2% | -5% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -6% | -0.4% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 2% | 15.7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 48.7% | 3.3% |
| Year to date | 56.6% | 39.5% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 77.4% | 95.2% |
Technicals
NUE has the stronger structure| Metric | NUE | SCCO |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 68.1 | 47.2 |
| ADX (14) | 16.9 | 16.1 |
| Price vs 50-day | 3.7% | 1.5% |
| Price vs 200-day | 23% | 9% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 35.3% | 57.8% |
Risk
Split| Metric | NUE | SCCO |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1 | 2.37 |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.88 | 1.53 |
| Sortino ratio | 3.13 | 2.5 |
| Max drawdown | -18.4% | -28.7% |
| Current drawdown | -7% | -11.6% |
| Annualized volatility | 32.5% | 52.9% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3% | -5% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, NUE or SCCO?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, NUE is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 58 against SCCO's 57. The edge comes from value and momentum. SCCO is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is NUE or SCCO the better buy right now?
NUE carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor NUE over SCCO?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. SCCO leads Quality by 42 points; NUE leads Value by 27 points; NUE leads Momentum by 23 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, NUE or SCCO?
Analyst price targets imply +1.8% upside for NUE and -19% for SCCO, so the Street currently favors NUE. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, NUE or SCCO?
NUE is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. NUE on the peer-relative Value factor, by 27 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, NUE or SCCO?
NUE on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, NUE or SCCO?
NUE on the Momentum factor, by 23 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, NUE or SCCO?
NUE is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. NUE carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is NUE more profitable than SCCO?
SCCO leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 15.5% vs 62.3%; operating margin 11.5% vs 56.9%; ttm roe 13.5% vs 49.4%.
Is NUE's lead over SCCO getting stronger or weaker?
NUE lead: Reversed — SCCO led by 13 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; NUE now leads by 1. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 5 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-10, when NUE moved ahead of SCCO.
What would change the NUE vs SCCO verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: SCCO closes the Value gap — currently 27 points behind, the largest single contributor to NUE's edge; SCCO generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as MACD Bullish Crossover; NUE's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about NUE and SCCO?
NUE: 4 bullish / 0 bearish. SCCO: 3 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on NUE is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On SCCO it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare NUE and SCCO with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.