NVST vs SOLV Stock Comparison
Compare NVST and SOLV across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between NVST and SOLV?
SOLV leads the current stock comparison as Solventum Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Envista Holdings Corp vs Solventum Corporation
SOLV leads
SOLV leads by 9 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Quality, and the lead has widened from 5 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors NVST on target upside.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support SOLV, its lead is widening, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Envista Holdings Corp
Solventum Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors SOLV over NVST, 63 versus 54 as of Sep 11, 2026. SOLV's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and quality, while NVST holds the stronger risk resilience profile. SOLV also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors NVST. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SOLV today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader is throwing conflicting signals. SOLV lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 5 to 9 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Envista Holdings Corp and Solventum Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare NVST and SOLV against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum38 vs 56SOLV +18
- Quality51 vs 67SOLV +16
- Risk Resilience70 vs 56NVST +14
- Value62 vs 67SOLV +5
4 of 6 evidence groups favor SOLV. SOLV’s edge is concentrated in momentum and quality; NVST keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
No factor moved materially.
New signals
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum -15
New signals
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
SOLV's lead narrowed by 3 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — NVST and SOLV both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
SOLV (Solventum Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and quality.
NVST (Envista Holdings Corp): the counter-case, on risk resilience, analyst expectations.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
SOLVSOLV on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
NVSTNVST on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
SOLVSOLV on the peer-relative Value factor, by 5 points.
Momentum
SOLVSOLV on the Momentum factor, by 18 points.
Lower downside
NVSTNVST on Risk Resilience, by 14 points.
Analyst upside
NVSTNVST on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors SOLV, analyst targets favor NVST. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | NVST | SOLV | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +16.2% | +3.7% | NVST has more room |
| Target dispersion | +37% | +77.2% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 8 | 9 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SOLV. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | SOLV | 54 vs 63 |
| Fundamentals | SOLVon balance | revenue growth 3.5% vs 10.1%; EPS growth 37.5% vs 6.6%; TTM ROE 4.1% vs 29%; gross margin 55.5% vs 54.7%; operating margin 9.9% vs 25% — SOLV takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | SOLV | Value 62 vs 67 |
| Technicals | SOLV | Price vs 50-day -6% vs 3.3%; vs 200-day 1.8% vs 13% |
| Risk Resilience | NVST | Risk Resilience 70 vs 56 |
| Analyst expectations | NVST | Target upside 16.2% vs 3.7% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of NVST and SOLV and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 9 points.
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on SOLV.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10SOLV lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 5 to 9 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- SOLV +9
- 54 vs 63
- 7 sessions ago
- SOLV +9
- 59 vs 68
- 30 sessions ago
- SOLV +5
- 58 vs 63
- 90 sessions ago
- Level
- 63 vs 63
The lead changed hands once in this window, most recently on Jun 22 when NVST moved ahead of SOLV.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (7.03%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
3 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (9.17%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
SOLV leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -1.24%, AIQ 0 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -0.23%, AIQ -3 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1NVST closes the Momentum gap — currently 18 points behind, the largest single contributor to SOLV's edge.
- 2NVST's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3SOLV's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
SOLV leads on balance| Metric | NVST | SOLV |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 3.5% | 10.1% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 37.5% | 6.6% |
| Gross margin | 55.5% | 54.7% |
| Operating margin | 9.9% | 25% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 4.1% | 29% |
| Debt to equity | 0.52 | 1.1 |
Performance
SOLV leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | NVST | SOLV |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -5.5% | -4.6% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -9.9% | 2.8% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 7.5% | 8.3% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -2.8% | 29.6% |
| Year to date | 19.2% | 10.6% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 23.2% | 17.5% |
Technicals
SOLV has the stronger structure| Metric | NVST | SOLV |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 38.8 | 45.3 |
| ADX (14) | 14.6 | 24.5 |
| Price vs 50-day | -6% | 3.3% |
| Price vs 200-day | 1.8% | 13% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 22.2% | 20.1% |
Risk
NVST is the more resilient| Metric | NVST | SOLV |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.27 | 0.62 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.66 | 0.64 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.09 | 1.03 |
| Max drawdown | -26% | -27.5% |
| Current drawdown | -14.5% | -5.2% |
| Annualized volatility | 37.5% | 29.9% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3% | -2.5% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, NVST or SOLV?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, SOLV is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 63 against NVST's 54. The edge comes from momentum and quality. NVST is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is NVST or SOLV the better buy right now?
SOLV carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor SOLV over NVST?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. SOLV leads Momentum by 18 points; SOLV leads Quality by 16 points; NVST leads Risk Resilience by 14 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, NVST or SOLV?
Analyst price targets imply +16.2% upside for NVST and +3.7% for SOLV, so the Street currently favors NVST. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors SOLV. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, NVST or SOLV?
SOLV is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. SOLV on the peer-relative Value factor, by 5 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, NVST or SOLV?
NVST on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, NVST or SOLV?
SOLV on the Momentum factor, by 18 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, NVST or SOLV?
NVST is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. NVST on Risk Resilience, by 14 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is NVST more profitable than SOLV?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 55.5% vs 54.7%; operating margin 9.9% vs 25%; ttm roe 4.1% vs 29%. NVST leads on one measure and SOLV on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is SOLV's lead over NVST getting stronger or weaker?
SOLV lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 5 to 9 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands once in that window, most recently on 2026-06-22, when NVST moved ahead of SOLV.
What would change the NVST vs SOLV verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: NVST closes the Momentum gap — currently 18 points behind, the largest single contributor to SOLV's edge; NVST's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; SOLV's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about NVST and SOLV?
NVST: 2 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. SOLV: 3 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on NVST is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On SOLV it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare NVST and SOLV with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.