NVT vs PRIM Stock Comparison
Compare NVT and PRIM across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between NVT and PRIM?
NVT leads the current stock comparison as nVent Electric plc, with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
nVent Electric plc vs Primoris Services Corporation
NVT leads
NVT leads by 6 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Momentum. Wall Street currently favors PRIM on target upside.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support NVT, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
nVent Electric plc
Primoris Services Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors NVT over PRIM, 48 versus 42 as of Sep 11, 2026. NVT's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and momentum, while PRIM holds the stronger value profile. NVT also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors PRIM. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor NVT today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability. NVT lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 6 points over 30 sessions.
Compare nVent Electric plc and Primoris Services Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare NVT and PRIM against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value37 vs 64PRIM +27
- Quality56 vs 32NVT +24
- Momentum51 vs 30NVT +21
- Risk Resilience46 vs 41NVT +5
4 of 6 evidence groups favor NVT. NVT’s edge is concentrated in quality and momentum; PRIM keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -14
No new signals fired.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
NVT's lead narrowed by 3 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — NVT and PRIM both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
NVT (nVent Electric plc): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and momentum.
PRIM (Primoris Services Corporation): the counter-case, on value, valuation, analyst expectations.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
NVTNVT on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
NVTNVT on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
PRIMPRIM on the peer-relative Value factor, by 27 points.
Momentum
NVTNVT on the Momentum factor, by 21 points.
Lower downside
NVTNVT on Risk Resilience, by 5 points.
Analyst upside
PRIMPRIM on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors NVT, analyst targets favor PRIM. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | NVT | PRIM | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +23.5% | +90.5% | PRIM has more room |
| Target dispersion | +22.4% | +78.1% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 12 | 8 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor NVT. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | NVT | 48 vs 42 |
| Fundamentals | NVT | revenue growth 18.5% vs 8.2%; EPS growth 51.1% vs -240.6%; TTM ROE 15.8% vs 8.5%; gross margin 37% vs 8.6%; operating margin 17.2% vs 3% |
| Valuation | PRIM | Value 37 vs 64 |
| Technicals | NVT | Price vs 50-day 3.5% vs -8.5%; vs 200-day 13.9% vs -40.7% |
| Risk Resilience | NVT | Risk Resilience 46 vs 41 |
| Analyst expectations | PRIM | Target upside 23.5% vs 90.5% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of NVT and PRIM and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 6 points.
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on NVT.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10NVT lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 6 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- NVT +6
- 48 vs 42
- 7 sessions ago
- NVT +1
- 42 vs 41
- 30 sessions ago
- NVT +4
- 47 vs 43
- 90 sessions ago
- PRIM +1
- 41 vs 42
The lead changed hands 9 times in this window, most recently on Sep 3 when NVT moved ahead of PRIM.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (15.15%)
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (4.48%)
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (49.68%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (4.78%)
PRIM is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 3 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +4.65%, AIQ -3 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +3.17%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1PRIM closes the Quality gap — currently 24 points behind, the largest single contributor to NVT's edge.
- 2PRIM's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3NVT's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
NVT leads on balance| Metric | NVT | PRIM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 18.5% | 8.2% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 51.1% | -240.6% |
| Gross margin | 37% | 8.6% |
| Operating margin | 17.2% | 3% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 15.8% | 8.5% |
| Debt to equity | 0.41 | 0.69 |
Performance
NVT leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | NVT | PRIM |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 4.7% | -1.7% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -9.3% | -10.4% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -1% | -22.3% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 39.7% | -45.4% |
| Year to date | 52.2% | -41.1% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 67.6% | -37.1% |
Technicals
NVT has the stronger structure| Metric | NVT | PRIM |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 51 | 35.1 |
| ADX (14) | 12.2 | 26.6 |
| Price vs 50-day | 3.5% | -8.5% |
| Price vs 200-day | 13.9% | -40.7% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 46.8% | 36.7% |
Risk
NVT is the more resilient| Metric | NVT | PRIM |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.03 | 1.94 |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.31 | -0.12 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.93 | -0.11 |
| Max drawdown | -27.5% | -64.5% |
| Current drawdown | -15.8% | -64% |
| Annualized volatility | 45.5% | 79.3% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -5% | -5.6% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, NVT or PRIM?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, NVT is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 48 against PRIM's 42. The edge comes from quality and momentum. PRIM is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is NVT or PRIM the better buy right now?
NVT carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor NVT over PRIM?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. PRIM leads Value by 27 points; NVT leads Quality by 24 points; NVT leads Momentum by 21 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, NVT or PRIM?
Analyst price targets imply +23.5% upside for NVT and +90.5% for PRIM, so the Street currently favors PRIM. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors NVT. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, NVT or PRIM?
PRIM is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. PRIM on the peer-relative Value factor, by 27 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, NVT or PRIM?
NVT on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, NVT or PRIM?
NVT on the Momentum factor, by 21 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, NVT or PRIM?
NVT is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. NVT on Risk Resilience, by 5 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is NVT more profitable than PRIM?
NVT leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 37% vs 8.6%; operating margin 17.2% vs 3%; ttm roe 15.8% vs 8.5%.
Is NVT's lead over PRIM getting stronger or weaker?
NVT lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 6 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 9 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-03, when NVT moved ahead of PRIM.
What would change the NVT vs PRIM verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: PRIM closes the Quality gap — currently 24 points behind, the largest single contributor to NVT's edge; PRIM's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; NVT's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about NVT and PRIM?
NVT: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. PRIM: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on NVT is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On PRIM it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare NVT and PRIM with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.