NVTS vs POWI Stock Comparison
POWI currently leads NVTS in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 45 vs 31. The clearest difference is quality.
What is the main difference between NVTS and POWI?
POWI leads the current stock comparison as Power Integrations, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Navitas Semiconductor Corp vs Power Integrations, Inc.
POWI leads
POWI leads by 14 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Risk Resilience. Wall Street currently favors NVTS on target upside.
Stable: 5 of 6 evidence groups support POWI.
Navitas Semiconductor Corp
Power Integrations, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors POWI over NVTS, 45 versus 31 as of Oct 21, 2026. POWI's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and risk resilience. POWI also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors NVTS. 5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor POWI today, and the comparison is rated Stable on stability. POWI lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 14 points over 30 sessions. POWI leads on all four AIQ factor dimensions. Value is itself one of those four, so a sweep is not explained by valuation alone — it deserves additional scrutiny for unmodeled catalysts, expectations or event risk.
Compare Navitas Semiconductor Corp and Power Integrations, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare NVTS and POWI against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality30 vs 58POWI +28
- Risk Resilience40 vs 53POWI +13
- Value34 vs 43POWI +9
- Momentum24 vs 28POWI +4
5 of 6 evidence groups favor POWI. POWI’s edge is concentrated in quality and risk resilience.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 7 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +3
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
POWI's lead widened by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — NVTS and POWI both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
POWI (Power Integrations, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and risk resilience.
NVTS (Navitas Semiconductor Corp): the counter-case, on analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 69.6% against 40.4%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
POWIPOWI on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
POWIPOWI on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
POWIPOWI on the peer-relative Value factor, by 9 points.
Momentum
POWIPOWI on the Momentum factor, by 4 points.
Lower downside
POWIPOWI on Risk Resilience, by 13 points.
Analyst upside
NVTSNVTS on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors POWI, analyst targets favor NVTS. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | NVTS | POWI | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +75.3% | +67.2% | NVTS has more room |
| Target dispersion | +52.3% | +22.3% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 4 | 3 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor POWI. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | POWI | 31 vs 45 |
| Fundamentals | POWIon balance | revenue growth 22.5% vs 9.8%; EPS growth -5.3% vs 203%; TTM ROE -61.5% vs 3.7%; gross margin -1.7% vs 53.6%; operating margin -270.2% vs 7.9% — POWI takes 4 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | POWI | Value 34 vs 43 |
| Technicals | POWI | Price vs 50-day -21.5% vs -7.3%; vs 200-day -34.6% vs -19.8% |
| Risk Resilience | POWI | Risk Resilience 40 vs 53 |
| Analyst expectations | NVTS | Target upside 75.3% vs 67.2% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of NVTS and POWI and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion rests on a wide gap and broad agreement. It is unlikely to turn on a single session.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 14 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- 5 of 6 covered evidence groups point the same way. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on POWI.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20POWI lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 14 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- POWI +14
- 31 vs 45
- 7 sessions ago
- POWI +13
- 31 vs 44
- 30 sessions ago
- POWI +14
- 36 vs 50
- 90 sessions ago
- POWI +6
- 42 vs 48
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 4 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
Only NVTS
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
0 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral
No signal that the other name lacks.
Both carry 4 more signals that do not separate them: Death Cross Active, ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode, Downtrend Structure Active, MACD Bearish Crossover.
NVTS is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +4.81%, AIQ 0 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +2.73%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1NVTS closes the Quality gap — currently 28 points behind, the largest single contributor to POWI's edge.
- 2NVTS's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3POWI starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
POWI leads on balance| Metric | NVTS | POWI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 22.5% | 9.8% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -5.3% | 203% |
| Gross margin | -1.7% | 53.6% |
| Operating margin | -270.2% | 7.9% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -61.5% | 3.7% |
| Debt to equity | 0.01 | 0 |
Performance
POWI leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | NVTS | POWI |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -16.4% | 0.6% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -29.9% | -8.7% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -31% | -35.2% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -32.7% | -24.5% |
| Year to date | 22.4% | 32.2% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -43.5% | -0.1% |
Technicals
POWI has the stronger structure| Metric | NVTS | POWI |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 26.7 | 35 |
| ADX (14) | 17.8 | 21.6 |
| Price vs 50-day | -21.5% | -7.3% |
| Price vs 200-day | -34.6% | -19.8% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 69.6% | 40.4% |
Risk
POWI is the more resilient| Metric | NVTS | POWI |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 4.84 | 2.11 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.12 | 0.27 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.23 | 0.41 |
| Max drawdown | -73.8% | -49.1% |
| Current drawdown | -72.5% | -46.2% |
| Annualized volatility | 120.6% | 57.7% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -10.1% | -6.5% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, NVTS or POWI?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, POWI is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 45 against NVTS's 31. The edge comes from quality and risk resilience. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is NVTS or POWI the better buy right now?
POWI carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Stable — 5 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Stable rating means the gap is wide and the evidence is broad, so the conclusion is unlikely to turn on a single session.
Why does the AIQ Score favor POWI over NVTS?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. POWI leads Quality by 28 points; POWI leads Risk Resilience by 13 points; POWI leads Value by 9 points. POWI leads on all four AIQ factor dimensions. Value is itself one of those four, so the sweep is not explained by NVTS simply being cheaper — it warrants extra scrutiny for unmodeled catalysts, forward expectations or event risk the factors do not capture.
Which has more analyst upside, NVTS or POWI?
Analyst price targets imply +75.3% upside for NVTS and +67.2% for POWI, so the Street currently favors NVTS. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors POWI. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, NVTS or POWI?
POWI is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. POWI on the peer-relative Value factor, by 9 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, NVTS or POWI?
POWI on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, NVTS or POWI?
POWI on the Momentum factor, by 4 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, NVTS or POWI?
POWI is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. POWI on Risk Resilience, by 13 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is NVTS more profitable than POWI?
POWI leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin -1.7% vs 53.6%; operating margin -270.2% vs 7.9%; ttm roe -61.5% vs 3.7%.
Is POWI's lead over NVTS getting stronger or weaker?
POWI lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 14 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the NVTS vs POWI verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: NVTS closes the Quality gap — currently 28 points behind, the largest single contributor to POWI's edge; NVTS's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; POWI starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about NVTS and POWI?
NVTS: 1 bullish / 4 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. POWI: 0 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on NVTS is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On POWI it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare NVTS and POWI with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.