NWE vs OGS Stock Comparison
Compare NWE and OGS across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between NWE and OGS?
NWE and OGS are close on the current AIQ evidence, so the better fit depends more on objective, risk tolerance and valuation preference than on a single headline score.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Northwestern Energy Group Inc vs ONE Gas, Inc.
NWE and OGS are effectively level
NWE and OGS are effectively level on the AIQ Score; the factor table below shows where each one holds its advantage.
Northwestern Energy Group Inc
ONE Gas, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score does not currently separate NWE and OGS as of Sep 11, 2026. Both names are scored on the same 0–100 scale across Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience, and the factor table below shows where each one holds its advantage.
Compare Northwestern Energy Group Inc and ONE Gas, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare NWE and OGS against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum45 vs 31NWE +14
- Quality47 vs 54OGS +7
- Value53 vs 58OGS +5
- Risk Resilience51 vs 52Even
Neither name separates cleanly on the covered dimensions.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -4
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum -2
New signals
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — NWE and OGS both carry a full feed there.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
EvenNeither separates on the overall score.
Growth
NWENWE on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
OGSOGS on the peer-relative Value factor, by 5 points.
Momentum
NWENWE on the Momentum factor, by 14 points.
Lower downside
NWENWE carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
OGSOGS on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | NWE | OGS | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | -8% | +15.3% | OGS has more room |
| Target dispersion | +33% | +21.3% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 2 | 6 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
How each independent group of evidence reads the pair.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 49 vs 49 |
| Fundamentals | OGSon balance | revenue growth -21.1% vs -50.5%; EPS growth -60.2% vs -63.9%; TTM ROE 5.9% vs 8.4%; gross margin 66.5% vs 74.6%; operating margin 18.8% vs 20.6% — OGS takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | OGS | Value 53 vs 58 |
| Technicals | NWE | Price vs 50-day -2.5% vs -2.7%; vs 200-day 1.1% vs -4.2% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 51 vs 52 |
| Analyst expectations | OGS | Target upside -8% vs 15.3% |
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 0 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10OGS lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 9 to 0 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- Level
- 49 vs 49
- 7 sessions ago
- OGS +5
- 50 vs 55
- 30 sessions ago
- OGS +9
- 50 vs 59
- 90 sessions ago
- OGS +4
- 48 vs 52
The lead changed hands 9 times in this window, most recently on Jul 16 when OGS moved ahead of NWE.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (2.49%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
1 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (2.72%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -1.1%, AIQ -1 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -1.05%, AIQ -1 points).
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
OGS leads on balance| Metric | NWE | OGS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -21.1% | -50.5% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -60.2% | -63.9% |
| Gross margin | 66.5% | 74.6% |
| Operating margin | 18.8% | 20.6% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 5.9% | 8.4% |
| Debt to equity | 1.24 | 0.96 |
Performance
NWE leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | NWE | OGS |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -0.3% | -2.2% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -0.8% | -2.8% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 0.4% | 1.6% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 4.5% | -9.1% |
| Year to date | 8.5% | 1.2% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 24% | 4.9% |
Technicals
NWE has the stronger structure| Metric | NWE | OGS |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 46.1 | 37.5 |
| ADX (14) | 10 | 9.7 |
| Price vs 50-day | -2.5% | -2.7% |
| Price vs 200-day | 1.1% | -4.2% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 17.7% | 20.5% |
Risk
Split| Metric | NWE | OGS |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.06 | -0.21 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.87 | 0.12 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.33 | 0.2 |
| Max drawdown | -11% | -16.5% |
| Current drawdown | -4.6% | -13.8% |
| Annualized volatility | 23% | 18.3% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.2% | -2% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which has more analyst upside, NWE or OGS?
Analyst price targets imply -8% upside for NWE and +15.3% for OGS, so the Street currently favors OGS. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, NWE or OGS?
OGS is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. OGS on the peer-relative Value factor, by 5 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, NWE or OGS?
NWE on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, NWE or OGS?
NWE on the Momentum factor, by 14 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, NWE or OGS?
NWE is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. NWE carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is NWE more profitable than OGS?
OGS leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 66.5% vs 74.6%; operating margin 18.8% vs 20.6%; ttm roe 5.9% vs 8.4%.
What do the current signals say about NWE and OGS?
NWE: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. OGS: 1 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on NWE is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On OGS it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare NWE and OGS with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.