NWS vs NWSA Stock Comparison
NWSA currently leads NWS in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 52 vs 51. The clearest difference is balanced.
What is the main difference between NWS and NWSA?
NWSA leads the current stock comparison as News Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from balanced and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
News Corporation vs News Corporation
NWSA leads
NWSA leads by 1 AIQ points.
Fragile: 1 of 5 evidence groups support NWSA, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
News Corporation
News Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors NWSA over NWS, 52 versus 51 as of Oct 31, 2026. NWSA also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 1 of 5 covered evidence groups favor NWSA today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. NWSA lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 1 points over 30 sessions.
Compare News Corporation and News Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare NWS and NWSA against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value36 vs 38Even
- Momentum49 vs 51Even
- Quality57 vs 57Even
- Risk Resilience70 vs 70Even
1 of 5 evidence groups favor NWSA. Neither name separates cleanly on the covered dimensions.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-28, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-27.
Largest factor move: Momentum -11
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum -23
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
NWSA's lead narrowed by 3 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — NWS and NWSA both carry a full feed there.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
NWSANWSA on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
EvenGrowth figures are not covered for both names.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
EvenDownside measures are level or not covered.
Analyst upside
EvenAnalyst targets are level or not covered for both names.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | NWS | NWSA | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | — | +14.5% | Level |
| Target dispersion | — | +16.8% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 9 | 3 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | NWS | NWSA |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $0.200 | $0.200 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $0.200 | $0.200 |
| Years increased | 0 | 0 |
| No cut in window | Yes | Yes |
| Cohort rank | #349 | #349 |
NWS and NWSA grew their split-adjusted regular dividends at the same rate over 2020–2025, 0.00% a year. Neither company reduced its regular dividend in any year of the window.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
1 of 5 covered evidence groups favor NWSA. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 51 vs 52 |
| Fundamentals | Even | revenue growth 7% vs 7%; EPS growth 106.3% vs 106.3%; TTM ROE 6.6% vs 6.6%; gross margin 56.9% vs 56.9%; operating margin 11.4% vs 11.4% |
| Valuation | Even | Value 36 vs 38 |
| Technicals | NWSA | Price vs 50-day -4.1% vs -2.3%; vs 200-day 5.2% vs 9.1% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 70 vs 70 |
| Analyst expectations | Not covered | Not covered |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of NWS and NWSA and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 1 of 5 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on NWSA.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 29 – Oct 28NWSA lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 1 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- NWSA +1
- 51 vs 52
- 7 sessions ago
- NWSA +1
- 58 vs 59
- 30 sessions ago
- Level
- 47 vs 47
- 90 sessions ago
- NWSA +1
- 56 vs 57
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
NWS and NWSA carry the same 4 signals, so the signals do not separate them: Bollinger Band Squeeze, Golden Cross Active, EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish, MACD Bullish Crossover.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -1.37%, AIQ -3 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -1.12%, AIQ -6 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1NWS's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 2NWSA's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 3A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | NWS | NWSA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 7% | 7% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 106.3% | 106.3% |
| Gross margin | 56.9% | 56.9% |
| Operating margin | 11.4% | 11.4% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 6.6% | 6.6% |
| Debt to equity | 0.34 | 0.34 |
Performance
NWSA leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | NWS | NWSA |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -3.8% | -3.7% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 0.9% | 2.3% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 0.7% | 4.3% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 5.8% | 11.7% |
| Year to date | 8% | 12.2% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 6.2% | 11.4% |
Technicals
NWSA has the stronger structure| Metric | NWS | NWSA |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 51 | 53.5 |
| ADX (14) | 19.3 | 23.8 |
| Price vs 50-day | -4.1% | -2.3% |
| Price vs 200-day | 5.2% | 9.1% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 19.7% | 20.2% |
Risk
Split| Metric | NWS | NWSA |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.23 | 0.17 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.09 | 0.34 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.12 | 0.49 |
| Max drawdown | -17.7% | -17.1% |
| Current drawdown | -9.4% | -6% |
| Annualized volatility | 26.8% | 26.1% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.7% | -2.5% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, NWS or NWSA?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, NWSA is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 52 against NWS's 51. The edge comes from its factor profile. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is NWS or NWSA the better buy right now?
NWSA carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 1 of 5 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor NWSA over NWS?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. . Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, NWS or NWSA?
Analyst price targets imply not covered upside for NWS and +14.5% for NWSA. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, NWS or NWSA?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, NWS or NWSA?
Growth figures are not covered for both names. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, NWS or NWSA?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, NWS or NWSA?
The two are close on downside measures. Downside measures are level or not covered. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is NWS more profitable than NWSA?
Margin data is not comparable for both names in the current snapshot.
Is NWSA's lead over NWS getting stronger or weaker?
NWSA lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 1 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-29 and 2026-10-28. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the NWS vs NWSA verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: NWS's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; NWSA's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about NWS and NWSA?
NWS: 3 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. NWSA: 3 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. The most decision-relevant rule on NWS is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On NWSA it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare NWS and NWSA with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.