OGE vs PEG Stock Comparison
Compare OGE and PEG across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between OGE and PEG?
OGE leads the current stock comparison as OGE Energy Corp., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
OGE Energy Corp. vs Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated
OGE leads
OGE leads by 2 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum. Wall Street currently favors PEG on target upside.
Fragile: 2 of 6 evidence groups support OGE, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
OGE Energy Corp.
Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors OGE over PEG, 49 versus 47 as of Sep 11, 2026. OGE's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum, while PEG holds the stronger quality profile. OGE also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors PEG. 2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor OGE today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. OGE lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 2 points over 30 sessions.
Compare OGE Energy Corp. and Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare OGE and PEG against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum48 vs 31OGE +17
- Quality46 vs 50PEG +4
- Value49 vs 53PEG +4
- Risk Resilience56 vs 56Even
2 of 6 evidence groups favor OGE. OGE’s edge is concentrated in momentum; PEG keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -1
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum +2
No new signals fired.
OGE's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — OGE and PEG both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
OGE (OGE Energy Corp.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum.
PEG (Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated): the counter-case, on quality, value, valuation.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
OGEOGE on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
OGEOGE on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
PEGPEG on the peer-relative Value factor, by 4 points.
Momentum
OGEOGE on the Momentum factor, by 17 points.
Lower downside
EvenDownside measures are level or not covered.
Analyst upside
PEGPEG on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors OGE, analyst targets favor PEG. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | OGE | PEG | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +8% | +20% | PEG has more room |
| Target dispersion | +13.9% | +17.3% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 5 | 4 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor OGE. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 49 vs 47 |
| Fundamentals | OGEon balance | revenue growth -5.4% vs -33.6%; EPS growth 133.3% vs -55%; TTM ROE 9.6% vs 11.7%; gross margin 53.6% vs 85.4%; operating margin 24.2% vs 23.1% — OGE takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | PEG | Value 49 vs 53 |
| Technicals | OGE | Price vs 50-day -2.2% vs -5.6%; vs 200-day 0.1% vs -9.2% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 56 vs 56 |
| Analyst expectations | PEG | Target upside 8% vs 20% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of OGE and PEG and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on OGE.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10OGE lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 2 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- OGE +2
- 49 vs 47
- 7 sessions ago
- OGE +1
- 48 vs 47
- 30 sessions ago
- OGE +2
- 48 vs 46
- 90 sessions ago
- PEG +3
- 53 vs 56
The lead changed hands 4 times in this window, most recently on Aug 5 when PEG moved ahead of OGE.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (2.18%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
1 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (4.06%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- 52-Week Low Proximity — bearish, risk, long horizon (0.2%)
PEG is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.09%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.12%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1PEG closes the Momentum gap — currently 17 points behind, the largest single contributor to OGE's edge.
- 2PEG's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3OGE's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
OGE leads on balance| Metric | OGE | PEG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -5.4% | -33.6% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 133.3% | -55% |
| Gross margin | 53.6% | 85.4% |
| Operating margin | 24.2% | 23.1% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 9.6% | 11.7% |
| Debt to equity | 1.17 | 1.42 |
Performance
OGE leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | OGE | PEG |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 0.3% | -1.1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -0.7% | -4.5% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -2.2% | -7.8% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -1% | -11.9% |
| Year to date | 9.1% | -8.8% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 7.2% | -9.6% |
Technicals
OGE has the stronger structure| Metric | OGE | PEG |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 48.7 | 36.8 |
| ADX (14) | 13.8 | 23.9 |
| Price vs 50-day | -2.2% | -5.6% |
| Price vs 200-day | 0.1% | -9.2% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 14.8% | 15.2% |
Risk
Split| Metric | OGE | PEG |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | -0.04 | 0.1 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.22 | -0.65 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.34 | -0.99 |
| Max drawdown | -10.4% | -16.6% |
| Current drawdown | -6.7% | -16.6% |
| Annualized volatility | 16.9% | 18.5% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -1.8% | -2.1% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, OGE or PEG?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, OGE is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 49 against PEG's 47. The edge comes from momentum. PEG is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is OGE or PEG the better buy right now?
OGE carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor OGE over PEG?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. OGE leads Momentum by 17 points; PEG leads Quality by 4 points; PEG leads Value by 4 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, OGE or PEG?
Analyst price targets imply +8% upside for OGE and +20% for PEG, so the Street currently favors PEG. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors OGE. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, OGE or PEG?
PEG is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. PEG on the peer-relative Value factor, by 4 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, OGE or PEG?
OGE on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, OGE or PEG?
OGE on the Momentum factor, by 17 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, OGE or PEG?
The two are close on downside measures. Downside measures are level or not covered. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is OGE more profitable than PEG?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 53.6% vs 85.4%; operating margin 24.2% vs 23.1%; ttm roe 9.6% vs 11.7%. OGE leads on one measure and PEG on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is OGE's lead over PEG getting stronger or weaker?
OGE lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 2 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 4 times in that window, most recently on 2026-08-05, when PEG moved ahead of OGE.
What would change the OGE vs PEG verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: PEG closes the Momentum gap — currently 17 points behind, the largest single contributor to OGE's edge; PEG's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; OGE's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about OGE and PEG?
OGE: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. PEG: 1 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on OGE is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On PEG it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare OGE and PEG with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.