OGS vs PNW Stock Comparison
OGS currently leads PNW in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 60 vs 56. The clearest difference is quality, while PNW has the stronger momentum profile.
What is the main difference between OGS and PNW?
OGS leads the current stock comparison as ONE Gas, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
ONE Gas, Inc. vs Pinnacle West Capital Corporation
OGS leads
OGS leads by 4 AIQ points, primarily on Quality, having only recently taken the lead back from PNW.
Fragile: 2 of 6 evidence groups support OGS, the lead recently changed hands, and its current signal state is conflicted.
ONE Gas, Inc.
Pinnacle West Capital Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors OGS over PNW, 60 versus 56 as of Oct 31, 2026. OGS's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality, while PNW holds the stronger momentum profile. OGS also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor OGS today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. OGS lead: Reversed — PNW led by 4 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; OGS now leads by 4.
Compare ONE Gas, Inc. and Pinnacle West Capital Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare OGS and PNW against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality54 vs 40OGS +14
- Momentum74 vs 79PNW +5
- Value58 vs 55Even
- Risk Resilience55 vs 52Even
2 of 6 evidence groups favor OGS. OGS’s edge is concentrated in quality; PNW keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-28, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-27.
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 3 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum -1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
OGS's lead was unchanged in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — OGS and PNW both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
OGS (ONE Gas, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality.
PNW (Pinnacle West Capital Corporation): the counter-case, on momentum, fundamentals, technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
OGSOGS on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
PNWPNW on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
PNWPNW on the Momentum factor, by 5 points.
Lower downside
OGSOGS carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
OGSOGS on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | OGS | PNW | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +10.4% | -2.6% | OGS has more room |
| Target dispersion | +20.8% | +35.7% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 8 | 7 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | OGS | PNW |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | 4.41% | 2.50% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $2.160 | $3.178 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $2.680 | $3.595 |
| Years increased | 5 | 5 |
| No cut in window | Yes | Yes |
| Cohort rank | #272 | #316 |
OGS grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 4.41% a year against PNW's 2.50%. Neither company reduced its regular dividend in any year of the window.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor OGS. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | OGS | 60 vs 56 |
| Fundamentals | PNWon balance | revenue growth -50.5% vs 26.6%; EPS growth -63.9% vs 4.4%; TTM ROE 8.4% vs 9%; gross margin 74.6% vs 55.5%; operating margin 20.6% vs 27% — PNW takes 4 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | Even | Value 58 vs 55 |
| Technicals | PNW | Price vs 50-day 2.9% vs 8.4%; vs 200-day -4.3% vs 4.6% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 55 vs 52 |
| Analyst expectations | OGS | Target upside 10.4% vs -2.6% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of OGS and PNW and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Signal direction runs against the verdict: the leader is net-bearish while the laggard is net-bullish. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on OGS.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 29 – Oct 28OGS lead: Reversed — PNW led by 4 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; OGS now leads by 4.
- Today
- OGS +4
- 60 vs 56
- 7 sessions ago
- OGS +3
- 60 vs 57
- 30 sessions ago
- PNW +4
- 48 vs 52
- 90 sessions ago
- OGS +11
- 57 vs 46
The lead changed hands 3 times in this window, most recently on Oct 20 when OGS moved ahead of PNW.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted
Only OGS
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
3 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
Only PNW
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
Both carry 2 more signals that do not separate them: Death Cross Active, MACD Bullish Crossover.
OGS leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.56%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.34%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1PNW closes the Quality gap — currently 14 points behind, the largest single contributor to OGS's edge.
- 2PNW's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3OGS's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
PNW leads on balance| Metric | OGS | PNW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -50.5% | 26.6% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -63.9% | 4.4% |
| Gross margin | 74.6% | 55.5% |
| Operating margin | 20.6% | 27% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 8.4% | 9% |
| Debt to equity | 0.96 | 1.62 |
Performance
PNW leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | OGS | PNW |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 2.5% | 0.9% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 7.8% | 12.7% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -0.8% | 3.5% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -11.6% | 3.1% |
| Year to date | 0.3% | 18.2% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -6.5% | 13.8% |
Technicals
PNW has the stronger structure| Metric | OGS | PNW |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 73.7 | 69.4 |
| ADX (14) | 25.9 | 32.9 |
| Price vs 50-day | 2.9% | 8.4% |
| Price vs 200-day | -4.3% | 4.6% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 18.2% | 19.9% |
Risk
Split| Metric | OGS | PNW |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | -0.26 | -0.13 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.48 | 0.71 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.77 | 1.23 |
| Max drawdown | -20.9% | -16.7% |
| Current drawdown | -14.5% | -4.1% |
| Annualized volatility | 18.3% | 17.1% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2% | -1.7% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, OGS or PNW?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, OGS is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 60 against PNW's 56. The edge comes from quality. PNW is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is OGS or PNW the better buy right now?
OGS carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor OGS over PNW?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. OGS leads Quality by 14 points; PNW leads Momentum by 5 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, OGS or PNW?
Analyst price targets imply +10.4% upside for OGS and -2.6% for PNW, so the Street currently favors OGS. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, OGS or PNW?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, OGS or PNW?
PNW on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, OGS or PNW?
PNW on the Momentum factor, by 5 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, OGS or PNW?
OGS is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. OGS carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is OGS more profitable than PNW?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 74.6% vs 55.5%; operating margin 20.6% vs 27%; ttm roe 8.4% vs 9%. OGS leads on one measure and PNW on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is OGS's lead over PNW getting stronger or weaker?
OGS lead: Reversed — PNW led by 4 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; OGS now leads by 4. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-29 and 2026-10-28. The lead has changed hands 3 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-20, when OGS moved ahead of PNW.
What would change the OGS vs PNW verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: PNW closes the Quality gap — currently 14 points behind, the largest single contributor to OGS's edge; PNW's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; OGS's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about OGS and PNW?
OGS: 1 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted. PNW: 3 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on OGS is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On PNW it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare OGS and PNW with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.