OHI vs PSA Stock Comparison
Compare OHI and PSA across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between OHI and PSA?
OHI leads the current stock comparison as Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. vs Public Storage
OHI leads
OHI leads by 13 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Value, having only recently taken the lead back from PSA. Wall Street currently favors PSA on target upside.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support OHI, the lead recently changed hands, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc.
Public Storage
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors OHI over PSA, 56 versus 43 as of Sep 11, 2026. OHI's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and value. OHI also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors PSA. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor OHI today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. OHI lead: Reversed — PSA led by 6 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; OHI now leads by 13.
Compare Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. and Public Storage across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare OHI and PSA against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum51 vs 17OHI +34
- Value50 vs 36OHI +14
- Quality65 vs 63Even
- Risk Resilience57 vs 58Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor OHI. OHI’s edge is concentrated in momentum and value.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
OHI's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — OHI and PSA both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
OHI (Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and value.
PSA (Public Storage): the counter-case, on analyst expectations.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
OHIOHI on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
OHIOHI on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
OHIOHI on the peer-relative Value factor, by 14 points.
Momentum
OHIOHI on the Momentum factor, by 34 points.
Lower downside
OHIOHI carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
PSAPSA on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors OHI, analyst targets favor PSA. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | OHI | PSA | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +7.3% | +10.5% | PSA has more room |
| Target dispersion | +19.8% | +14.3% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 8 | 10 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor OHI. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | OHI | 56 vs 43 |
| Fundamentals | OHIon balance | revenue growth 3.9% vs 1.2%; EPS growth 157.4% vs -5.9%; TTM ROE 16.5% vs 22.1%; gross margin 72% vs 60.4%; operating margin 62.4% vs 48.3% — OHI takes 4 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | OHI | Value 50 vs 36 |
| Technicals | OHI | Price vs 50-day -2.6% vs -7%; vs 200-day 1.2% vs -1.2% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 57 vs 58 |
| Analyst expectations | PSA | Target upside 7.3% vs 10.5% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of OHI and PSA and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 13 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on OHI.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10OHI lead: Reversed — PSA led by 6 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; OHI now leads by 13.
- Today
- OHI +13
- 56 vs 43
- 7 sessions ago
- OHI +9
- 54 vs 45
- 30 sessions ago
- PSA +6
- 49 vs 55
- 90 sessions ago
- OHI +7
- 61 vs 54
The lead changed hands 4 times in this window, most recently on Aug 26 when OHI moved ahead of PSA.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (3.94%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
2 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (6.95%)
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
PSA is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.09%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.64%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1PSA closes the Momentum gap — currently 34 points behind, the largest single contributor to OHI's edge.
- 2PSA's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3OHI's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
OHI leads on balance| Metric | OHI | PSA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 3.9% | 1.2% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 157.4% | -5.9% |
| Gross margin | 72% | 60.4% |
| Operating margin | 62.4% | 48.3% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 16.5% | 22.1% |
| Debt to equity | 0.75 | 1.11 |
Performance
OHI leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | OHI | PSA |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -0.1% | -2.2% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 2.4% | -9% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 2.4% | -9% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -2% | -1.8% |
| Year to date | 5.9% | 13.5% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 8.3% | 0% |
Technicals
OHI has the stronger structure| Metric | OHI | PSA |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 52.1 | 19.8 |
| ADX (14) | 22.4 | 22.2 |
| Price vs 50-day | -2.6% | -7% |
| Price vs 200-day | 1.2% | -1.2% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 14.5% | 17.8% |
Risk
Split| Metric | OHI | PSA |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | -0.26 | 0.38 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.36 | 0.01 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.61 | 0.02 |
| Max drawdown | -11.9% | -17.1% |
| Current drawdown | -9.2% | -10.8% |
| Annualized volatility | 21% | 23.2% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -1.8% | -2.4% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, OHI or PSA?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, OHI is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 56 against PSA's 43. The edge comes from momentum and value. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is OHI or PSA the better buy right now?
OHI carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor OHI over PSA?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. OHI leads Momentum by 34 points; OHI leads Value by 14 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, OHI or PSA?
Analyst price targets imply +7.3% upside for OHI and +10.5% for PSA, so the Street currently favors PSA. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors OHI. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, OHI or PSA?
OHI is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. OHI on the peer-relative Value factor, by 14 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, OHI or PSA?
OHI on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, OHI or PSA?
OHI on the Momentum factor, by 34 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, OHI or PSA?
OHI is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. OHI carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is OHI more profitable than PSA?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 72% vs 60.4%; operating margin 62.4% vs 48.3%; ttm roe 16.5% vs 22.1%. OHI leads on two measures and PSA on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is OHI's lead over PSA getting stronger or weaker?
OHI lead: Reversed — PSA led by 6 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; OHI now leads by 13. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 4 times in that window, most recently on 2026-08-26, when OHI moved ahead of PSA.
What would change the OHI vs PSA verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: PSA closes the Momentum gap — currently 34 points behind, the largest single contributor to OHI's edge; PSA's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; OHI's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about OHI and PSA?
OHI: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. PSA: 2 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on OHI is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On PSA it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare OHI and PSA with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.