OHI vs RHP Stock Comparison
Compare OHI and RHP across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between OHI and RHP?
OHI leads the current stock comparison as Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. vs Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc.
OHI leads
OHI leads by 7 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Momentum, having only recently taken the lead back from RHP.
Fragile: 4 of 6 evidence groups support OHI, the lead recently changed hands, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc.
Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors OHI over RHP, 56 versus 49 as of Sep 11, 2026. OHI's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and momentum, while RHP holds the stronger value profile. OHI also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor OHI today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. OHI lead: Reversed — RHP led by 4 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; OHI now leads by 7.
Compare Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. and Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare OHI and RHP against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality65 vs 44OHI +21
- Value50 vs 67RHP +17
- Momentum51 vs 34OHI +17
- Risk Resilience57 vs 49OHI +8
4 of 6 evidence groups favor OHI. OHI’s edge is concentrated in quality and momentum; RHP keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum -1
No new signals fired.
OHI's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — OHI and RHP both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
OHI (Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and momentum.
RHP (Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc.): the counter-case, on value, valuation, technicals — but at materially higher volatility, 22.6% against 14.5%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
OHIOHI on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
OHIOHI on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
RHPRHP on the peer-relative Value factor, by 17 points.
Momentum
OHIOHI on the Momentum factor, by 17 points.
Lower downside
OHIOHI on Risk Resilience, by 8 points.
Analyst upside
OHIOHI on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | OHI | RHP | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +7.3% | +5.5% | OHI has more room |
| Target dispersion | +19.8% | +32.6% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 8 | 7 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor OHI. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | OHI | 56 vs 49 |
| Fundamentals | OHIon balance | revenue growth 3.9% vs 12.7%; EPS growth 157.4% vs 31.2%; TTM ROE 16.5% vs 36.4%; gross margin 72% vs 16%; operating margin 62.4% vs 19.8% — OHI takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | RHP | Value 50 vs 67 |
| Technicals | RHP | Price vs 50-day -2.6% vs -4%; vs 200-day 1.2% vs 12.9% |
| Risk Resilience | OHI | Risk Resilience 57 vs 49 |
| Analyst expectations | OHI | Target upside 7.3% vs 5.5% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of OHI and RHP and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 7 points.
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has swung materially session to session. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on OHI.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10OHI lead: Reversed — RHP led by 4 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; OHI now leads by 7.
- Today
- OHI +7
- 56 vs 49
- 7 sessions ago
- OHI +2
- 54 vs 52
- 30 sessions ago
- RHP +4
- 49 vs 53
- 90 sessions ago
- OHI +4
- 61 vs 57
The lead changed hands 6 times in this window, most recently on Sep 1 when OHI moved ahead of RHP.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (3.94%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
1 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (17.31%)
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
RHP is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.09%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.29%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1RHP closes the Quality gap — currently 21 points behind, the largest single contributor to OHI's edge.
- 2RHP's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it.
- 3OHI's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
OHI leads on balance| Metric | OHI | RHP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 3.9% | 12.7% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 157.4% | 31.2% |
| Gross margin | 72% | 16% |
| Operating margin | 62.4% | 19.8% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 16.5% | 36.4% |
| Debt to equity | 0.75 | 5.52 |
Performance
RHP leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | OHI | RHP |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -0.1% | -0.2% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 2.4% | -1.3% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 2.4% | 3.1% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -2% | 28.5% |
| Year to date | 5.9% | 29.3% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 8.3% | 21.8% |
Technicals
RHP has the stronger structure| Metric | OHI | RHP |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 52.1 | 35.5 |
| ADX (14) | 22.4 | 18.2 |
| Price vs 50-day | -2.6% | -4% |
| Price vs 200-day | 1.2% | 12.9% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 14.5% | 22.6% |
Risk
OHI is the more resilient| Metric | OHI | RHP |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | -0.26 | 0.55 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.36 | 0.84 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.61 | 1.42 |
| Max drawdown | -11.9% | -14.7% |
| Current drawdown | -9.2% | -10% |
| Annualized volatility | 21% | 24.2% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -1.8% | -2.4% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, OHI or RHP?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, OHI is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 56 against RHP's 49. The edge comes from quality and momentum. RHP is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is OHI or RHP the better buy right now?
OHI carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor OHI over RHP?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. OHI leads Quality by 21 points; RHP leads Value by 17 points; OHI leads Momentum by 17 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, OHI or RHP?
Analyst price targets imply +7.3% upside for OHI and +5.5% for RHP, so the Street currently favors OHI. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, OHI or RHP?
RHP is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. RHP on the peer-relative Value factor, by 17 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, OHI or RHP?
OHI on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, OHI or RHP?
OHI on the Momentum factor, by 17 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, OHI or RHP?
OHI is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. OHI on Risk Resilience, by 8 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is OHI more profitable than RHP?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 72% vs 16%; operating margin 62.4% vs 19.8%; ttm roe 16.5% vs 36.4%. OHI leads on two measures and RHP on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is OHI's lead over RHP getting stronger or weaker?
OHI lead: Reversed — RHP led by 4 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; OHI now leads by 7. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 6 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-01, when OHI moved ahead of RHP.
What would change the OHI vs RHP verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: RHP closes the Quality gap — currently 21 points behind, the largest single contributor to OHI's edge; RHP's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it; OHI's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about OHI and RHP?
OHI: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. RHP: 1 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on OHI is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On RHP it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare OHI and RHP with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.