OHI vs SBRA Stock Comparison
Compare OHI and SBRA across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between OHI and SBRA?
OHI leads the current stock comparison as Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. vs Sabra Health Care REIT, Inc.
OHI leads
OHI leads by 5 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Quality, and the lead has widened from 2 points over 30 sessions.
Competitive: 3 of 6 evidence groups support OHI, its lead is widening, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc.
Sabra Health Care REIT, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors OHI over SBRA, 56 versus 51 as of Sep 11, 2026. OHI's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and quality, while SBRA holds the stronger momentum profile. OHI also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor OHI today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. OHI lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 2 to 5 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. and Sabra Health Care REIT, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare OHI and SBRA against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value50 vs 31OHI +19
- Quality65 vs 48OHI +17
- Momentum51 vs 67SBRA +16
- Risk Resilience57 vs 69SBRA +12
3 of 6 evidence groups favor OHI. OHI’s edge is concentrated in value and quality; SBRA keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum +1
No new signals fired.
OHI's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — OHI and SBRA both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
OHI (Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and quality.
SBRA (Sabra Health Care REIT, Inc.): the counter-case, on momentum, risk resilience, technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
OHIOHI on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
OHIOHI on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
OHIOHI on the peer-relative Value factor, by 19 points.
Momentum
SBRASBRA on the Momentum factor, by 16 points.
Lower downside
SBRASBRA on Risk Resilience, by 12 points.
Analyst upside
EvenAnalyst targets are level or not covered for both names.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | OHI | SBRA | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +7.3% | +7.2% | Level |
| Target dispersion | +19.8% | +27.3% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 8 | 7 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor OHI. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | OHI | 56 vs 51 |
| Fundamentals | OHIon balance | revenue growth 3.9% vs 6.4%; EPS growth 157.4% vs -162.5%; TTM ROE 16.5% vs 2.3%; gross margin 72% vs 72.6%; operating margin 62.4% vs 11.8% — OHI takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | OHI | Value 50 vs 31 |
| Technicals | SBRA | Price vs 50-day -2.6% vs -0.7%; vs 200-day 1.2% vs 4.7% |
| Risk Resilience | SBRA | Risk Resilience 57 vs 69 |
| Analyst expectations | Even | Target upside 7.3% vs 7.2% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of OHI and SBRA and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on OHI.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10OHI lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 2 to 5 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- OHI +5
- 56 vs 51
- 7 sessions ago
- OHI +3
- 54 vs 51
- 30 sessions ago
- OHI +2
- 49 vs 47
- 90 sessions ago
- OHI +8
- 61 vs 53
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (3.94%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
4 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (3.94%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.09%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -1.49%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1SBRA closes the Value gap — currently 19 points behind, the largest single contributor to OHI's edge.
- 2SBRA's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3OHI's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
OHI leads on balance| Metric | OHI | SBRA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 3.9% | 6.4% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 157.4% | -162.5% |
| Gross margin | 72% | 72.6% |
| Operating margin | 62.4% | 11.8% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 16.5% | 2.3% |
| Debt to equity | 0.75 | 0.96 |
Performance
SBRA leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | OHI | SBRA |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -0.1% | -0.1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 2.4% | 3.2% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 2.4% | 10.7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -2% | 0.9% |
| Year to date | 5.9% | 10% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 8.3% | 8.5% |
Technicals
SBRA has the stronger structure| Metric | OHI | SBRA |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 52.1 | 56.5 |
| ADX (14) | 22.4 | 10.2 |
| Price vs 50-day | -2.6% | -0.7% |
| Price vs 200-day | 1.2% | 4.7% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 14.5% | 15.2% |
Risk
SBRA is the more resilient| Metric | OHI | SBRA |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | -0.26 | -0.21 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.36 | 0.32 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.61 | 0.57 |
| Max drawdown | -11.9% | -16.6% |
| Current drawdown | -9.2% | -7% |
| Annualized volatility | 21% | 24.1% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -1.8% | -2.4% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, OHI or SBRA?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, OHI is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 56 against SBRA's 51. The edge comes from value and quality. SBRA is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is OHI or SBRA the better buy right now?
OHI carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor OHI over SBRA?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. OHI leads Value by 19 points; OHI leads Quality by 17 points; SBRA leads Momentum by 16 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, OHI or SBRA?
Analyst price targets imply +7.3% upside for OHI and +7.2% for SBRA. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, OHI or SBRA?
OHI is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. OHI on the peer-relative Value factor, by 19 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, OHI or SBRA?
OHI on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, OHI or SBRA?
SBRA on the Momentum factor, by 16 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, OHI or SBRA?
SBRA is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. SBRA on Risk Resilience, by 12 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is OHI more profitable than SBRA?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 72% vs 72.6%; operating margin 62.4% vs 11.8%; ttm roe 16.5% vs 2.3%. OHI leads on two measures and SBRA on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is OHI's lead over SBRA getting stronger or weaker?
OHI lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 2 to 5 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the OHI vs SBRA verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: SBRA closes the Value gap — currently 19 points behind, the largest single contributor to OHI's edge; SBRA's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; OHI's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about OHI and SBRA?
OHI: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. SBRA: 4 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. The most decision-relevant rule on OHI is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On SBRA it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare OHI and SBRA with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.