OI vs PCT Stock Comparison
OI currently leads PCT in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 42 vs 23. The clearest difference is value.
What is the main difference between OI and PCT?
OI leads the current stock comparison as O-I Glass, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
O-I Glass, Inc. vs PureCycle Technologies, Inc.
OI leads
OI leads by 19 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Momentum, and the lead has widened from 13 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors PCT on target upside.
Stable: 5 of 6 evidence groups support OI, its lead is widening, and its current signal state is conflicted.
O-I Glass, Inc.
PureCycle Technologies, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors OI over PCT, 42 versus 23 as of Oct 21, 2026. OI's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and momentum. OI also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors PCT. 5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor OI today, and the comparison is rated Stable on stability: the leader is throwing conflicting signals. OI lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 13 to 19 points over 30 sessions.
Compare O-I Glass, Inc. and PureCycle Technologies, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price return from daily closes; distributions are not included.
Price return comparison
Growth of $10,000, price only
Split-adjusted closes only. Distributions are excluded, which understates the return of any fund or stock that pays them.
Compare OI and PCT against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value74 vs 34OI +40
- Momentum49 vs 25OI +24
- Risk Resilience38 vs 30OI +8
- Quality7 vs 7Even
5 of 6 evidence groups favor OI. OI’s edge is concentrated in value and momentum.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 8 active signals are unchanged.
OI's lead was unchanged in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — OI and PCT both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
OI (O-I Glass, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and momentum.
PCT (PureCycle Technologies, Inc.): the counter-case, on analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 58.2% against 37.9%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
OIOI on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
PCTPCT on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
OIOI on the peer-relative Value factor, by 40 points.
Momentum
OIOI on the Momentum factor, by 24 points.
Lower downside
OIOI on Risk Resilience, by 8 points.
Analyst upside
PCTPCT on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors OI, analyst targets favor PCT. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | OI | PCT | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +70.9% | +393.5% | PCT has more room |
| Target dispersion | +77.5% | +29.3% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 6 | 3 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor OI. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | OI | 42 vs 23 |
| Fundamentals | OIon balance | revenue growth 8.3% vs 9.3%; EPS growth -12.2% vs -3.2%; TTM ROE -107.8% vs -196.9%; gross margin 14.8% vs -9.9%; operating margin 8% vs -12.1% — OI takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | OI | Value 74 vs 34 |
| Technicals | OI | Price vs 50-day -5.5% vs -49.1%; vs 200-day -40% vs -61.2% |
| Risk Resilience | OI | Risk Resilience 38 vs 30 |
| Analyst expectations | PCT | Target upside 70.9% vs 393.5% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of OI and PCT and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion rests on a wide gap and broad agreement. It is unlikely to turn on a single session.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 19 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- 5 of 6 covered evidence groups point the same way. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on OI.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20OI lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 13 to 19 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- OI +19
- 42 vs 23
- 7 sessions ago
- OI +18
- 41 vs 23
- 30 sessions ago
- OI +13
- 36 vs 23
- 90 sessions ago
- OI +5
- 35 vs 30
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only OI
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
1 bullish / 5 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
Only PCT
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
- 52-Week Low Proximity — bearish, risk, long horizon (0.0%)
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
Both carry 3 more signals that do not separate them: Death Cross Active, ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode, Downtrend Structure Active.
OI leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +2.2%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -5.46%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1PCT closes the Value gap — currently 40 points behind, the largest single contributor to OI's edge.
- 2PCT's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3OI's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
OI leads on balance| Metric | OI | PCT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 8.3% | 9.3% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -12.2% | -3.2% |
| Gross margin | 14.8% | -9.9% |
| Operating margin | 8% | -12.1% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -107.8% | -196.9% |
| Debt to equity | 13.02 | 1.52 |
Performance
OI leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | OI | PCT |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 0.2% | -14.8% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -4.5% | -44.7% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -34.6% | -53.3% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -44.1% | -56.2% |
| Year to date | -60% | -62.8% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -51% | -79.2% |
Technicals
OI has the stronger structure| Metric | OI | PCT |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 59 | 12.2 |
| ADX (14) | 28.9 | 54.2 |
| Price vs 50-day | -5.5% | -49.1% |
| Price vs 200-day | -40% | -61.2% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 37.9% | 58.2% |
Risk
OI is the more resilient| Metric | OI | PCT |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.16 | 2.44 |
| Sharpe ratio | -1.16 | -1.47 |
| Sortino ratio | -1.55 | -2.37 |
| Max drawdown | -66.5% | -79.3% |
| Current drawdown | -64.5% | -79.3% |
| Annualized volatility | 53.7% | 82.2% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -4.8% | -8% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, OI or PCT?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, OI is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 42 against PCT's 23. The edge comes from value and momentum. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is OI or PCT the better buy right now?
OI carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Stable — 5 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Stable rating means the gap is wide and the evidence is broad, so the conclusion is unlikely to turn on a single session.
Why does the AIQ Score favor OI over PCT?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. OI leads Value by 40 points; OI leads Momentum by 24 points; OI leads Risk Resilience by 8 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, OI or PCT?
Analyst price targets imply +70.9% upside for OI and +393.5% for PCT, so the Street currently favors PCT. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors OI. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, OI or PCT?
OI is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. OI on the peer-relative Value factor, by 40 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, OI or PCT?
PCT on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, OI or PCT?
OI on the Momentum factor, by 24 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, OI or PCT?
OI is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. OI on Risk Resilience, by 8 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is OI more profitable than PCT?
OI leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 14.8% vs -9.9%; operating margin 8% vs -12.1%; ttm roe -107.8% vs -196.9%.
Is OI's lead over PCT getting stronger or weaker?
OI lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 13 to 19 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the OI vs PCT verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: PCT closes the Value gap — currently 40 points behind, the largest single contributor to OI's edge; PCT's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; OI's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about OI and PCT?
OI: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. PCT: 1 bullish / 5 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on OI is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On PCT it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare OI and PCT with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.