OKE vs PR Stock Comparison
PR currently leads OKE in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 57 vs 53. The clearest difference is quality, while OKE has the stronger value profile.
What is the main difference between OKE and PR?
PR leads the current stock comparison as Permian Resources Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
ONEOK, Inc. vs Permian Resources Corporation
PR leads
PR leads by 4 AIQ points, primarily on Quality.
Fragile: 4 of 6 evidence groups support PR, and its current signal state is conflicted.
ONEOK, Inc.
Permian Resources Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors PR over OKE, 57 versus 53 as of Oct 21, 2026. PR's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality, while OKE holds the stronger value profile. PR also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor PR today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. PR lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 4 points over 30 sessions.
Compare ONEOK, Inc. and Permian Resources Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare OKE and PR against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality35 vs 60PR +25
- Value50 vs 40OKE +10
- Risk Resilience50 vs 48Even
- Momentum80 vs 79Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor PR. PR’s edge is concentrated in quality; OKE keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +18
New signals
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience +1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 8 active signals are unchanged.
PR's lead narrowed by 5 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — OKE and PR both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
PR (Permian Resources Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality.
OKE (ONEOK, Inc.): the counter-case, on value, valuation.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
PRPR on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
EvenGrowth figures are not covered for both names.
Value
OKEOKE on the peer-relative Value factor, by 10 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
OKEOKE carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
PRPR on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | OKE | PR | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +5.7% | +7.2% | PR has more room |
| Target dispersion | +24.4% | +22.5% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 11 | 11 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor PR. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | PR | 53 vs 57 |
| Fundamentals | PRon balance | revenue growth 25.3% vs 33.9%; EPS growth 24.4% vs 16.7%; TTM ROE 16.3% vs 11.3%; gross margin 21.8% vs 49.9%; operating margin 18.5% vs 37.7% — PR takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | OKE | Value 50 vs 40 |
| Technicals | PR | Price vs 50-day 0.5% vs 8.5%; vs 200-day 5.7% vs 24.5% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 50 vs 48 |
| Analyst expectations | PR | Target upside 5.7% vs 7.2% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of OKE and PR and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on PR.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20PR lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 4 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- PR +4
- 53 vs 57
- 7 sessions ago
- PR +10
- 47 vs 57
- 30 sessions ago
- PR +4
- 40 vs 44
- 90 sessions ago
- PR +5
- 53 vs 58
The lead changed hands 2 times in this window, most recently on Jun 30 when PR moved ahead of OKE.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
4 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
No signal that the other name lacks.
6 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only PR
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- 52-Week High Proximity — bullish, risk, long horizon (0.0%)
Both carry 5 more signals that do not separate them: Golden Cross Active, RSI Overbought, EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish, Uptrend Structure Active, MACD Bullish Crossover.
PR leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +0.29%, AIQ +5 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price 0%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1OKE closes the Quality gap — currently 25 points behind, the largest single contributor to PR's edge.
- 2OKE's RSI Overbought resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it.
- 3PR's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 6 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
PR leads on balance| Metric | OKE | PR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 25.3% | 33.9% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 24.4% | 16.7% |
| Gross margin | 21.8% | 49.9% |
| Operating margin | 18.5% | 37.7% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 16.3% | 11.3% |
| Debt to equity | 1.44 | 0.26 |
Performance
PR leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | OKE | PR |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -0.6% | 2.4% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 3.1% | 16.7% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 1.2% | 16.1% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 9.6% | 24.8% |
| Year to date | 26.3% | 74.4% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 36.1% | 103.4% |
Technicals
PR has the stronger structure| Metric | OKE | PR |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 70.9 | 84.6 |
| ADX (14) | 13.7 | 24.4 |
| Price vs 50-day | 0.5% | 8.5% |
| Price vs 200-day | 5.7% | 24.5% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 26.5% | 28.6% |
Risk
Split| Metric | OKE | PR |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | -0.55 | -0.54 |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.13 | 2.16 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.67 | 3.32 |
| Max drawdown | -12.6% | -20.4% |
| Current drawdown | -4.8% | 0% |
| Annualized volatility | 27.5% | 33.5% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.8% | -3.3% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, OKE or PR?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, PR is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 57 against OKE's 53. The edge comes from quality. OKE is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is OKE or PR the better buy right now?
PR carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor PR over OKE?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. PR leads Quality by 25 points; OKE leads Value by 10 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, OKE or PR?
Analyst price targets imply +5.7% upside for OKE and +7.2% for PR, so the Street currently favors PR. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, OKE or PR?
OKE is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. OKE on the peer-relative Value factor, by 10 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, OKE or PR?
Growth figures are not covered for both names. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, OKE or PR?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, OKE or PR?
OKE is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. OKE carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is OKE more profitable than PR?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 21.8% vs 49.9%; operating margin 18.5% vs 37.7%; ttm roe 16.3% vs 11.3%. OKE leads on one measure and PR on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is PR's lead over OKE getting stronger or weaker?
PR lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 4 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 2 times in that window, most recently on 2026-06-30, when PR moved ahead of OKE.
What would change the OKE vs PR verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: OKE closes the Quality gap — currently 25 points behind, the largest single contributor to PR's edge; OKE's RSI Overbought resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it; PR's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 6 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about OKE and PR?
OKE: 4 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. PR: 6 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on OKE is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On PR it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare OKE and PR with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.