OKLO vs UEC Stock Comparison
UEC currently leads OKLO in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 42 vs 37. The clearest difference is momentum.
What is the main difference between OKLO and UEC?
UEC leads the current stock comparison as Uranium Energy Corp., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Oklo Inc. vs Uranium Energy Corp.
UEC leads
UEC leads by 5 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Quality. Wall Street currently favors OKLO on target upside.
Fragile: 2 of 6 evidence groups support UEC, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Oklo Inc.
Uranium Energy Corp.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors UEC over OKLO, 42 versus 37 as of Oct 31, 2026. UEC's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and quality. UEC also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors OKLO. 2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor UEC today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. UEC lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 5 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Oklo Inc. and Uranium Energy Corp. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price return from daily closes; distributions are not included.
Price return comparison
Growth of $10,000, price only
Split-adjusted closes only. Distributions are excluded, which understates the return of any fund or stock that pays them.
Compare OKLO and UEC against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum25 vs 33UEC +8
- Quality42 vs 49UEC +7
- Value34 vs 34Even
- Risk Resilience56 vs 56Even
2 of 6 evidence groups favor UEC. UEC’s edge is concentrated in momentum and quality.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-28, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-27.
Largest factor move: Momentum +1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 6 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +6
New signals
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
UEC's lead widened by 2 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — OKLO and UEC both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
UEC (Uranium Energy Corp.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and quality.
OKLO (Oklo Inc.): the counter-case, on analyst expectations.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
UECUEC on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
OKLOOKLO on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
UECUEC on the Momentum factor, by 8 points.
Lower downside
OKLOOKLO carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
OKLOOKLO on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors UEC, analyst targets favor OKLO. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | OKLO | UEC | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +145.9% | +108.3% | OKLO has more room |
| Target dispersion | +95% | +104.3% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 6 | 4 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor UEC. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | UEC | 37 vs 42 |
| Fundamentals | Even | EPS growth -47.4% vs -281.9%; TTM ROE -7.1% vs -8.1%; gross margin 26.9% vs 42.3%; operating margin -180% vs -6.3% |
| Valuation | Even | Value 34 vs 34 |
| Technicals | UEC | Price vs 50-day -30.2% vs -23%; vs 200-day -50.3% vs -33.9% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 56 vs 56 |
| Analyst expectations | OKLO | Target upside 145.9% vs 108.3% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of OKLO and UEC and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on UEC.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 29 – Oct 28UEC lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 5 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- UEC +5
- 37 vs 42
- 7 sessions ago
- UEC +3
- 37 vs 40
- 30 sessions ago
- UEC +3
- 39 vs 42
- 90 sessions ago
- UEC +10
- 41 vs 51
The lead changed hands 3 times in this window, most recently on Sep 28 when UEC moved ahead of OKLO.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 4 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only OKLO
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
Only UEC
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Both carry 3 more signals that do not separate them: Death Cross Active, ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode, Downtrend Structure Active.
UEC leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -5.82%, AIQ 0 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -5.4%, AIQ +2 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1OKLO closes the Momentum gap — currently 8 points behind, the largest single contributor to UEC's edge.
- 2OKLO's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3UEC's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | OKLO | UEC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 0% | -100% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -47.4% | -281.9% |
| Gross margin | 26.9% | 42.3% |
| Operating margin | -180% | -6.3% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -7.1% | -8.1% |
| Debt to equity | 0 | 0 |
Performance
UEC leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | OKLO | UEC |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -2.2% | 5.6% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -26.7% | -11.7% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -34% | -14.4% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -58.3% | -37.8% |
| Year to date | -62.2% | -28.6% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -80.1% | -38.9% |
Technicals
UEC has the stronger structure| Metric | OKLO | UEC |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 22.2 | 39.9 |
| ADX (14) | 31 | 34.8 |
| Price vs 50-day | -30.2% | -23% |
| Price vs 200-day | -50.3% | -33.9% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 64.1% | 70.8% |
Risk
Split| Metric | OKLO | UEC |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 4.09 | 3.19 |
| Sharpe ratio | -1.31 | -0.45 |
| Sortino ratio | -2.37 | -0.76 |
| Max drawdown | -81.9% | -63.5% |
| Current drawdown | -81.1% | -58.6% |
| Annualized volatility | 92% | 77.1% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -8.9% | -7.7% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, OKLO or UEC?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, UEC is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 42 against OKLO's 37. The edge comes from momentum and quality. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is OKLO or UEC the better buy right now?
UEC carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor UEC over OKLO?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. UEC leads Momentum by 8 points; UEC leads Quality by 7 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, OKLO or UEC?
Analyst price targets imply +145.9% upside for OKLO and +108.3% for UEC, so the Street currently favors OKLO. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors UEC. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, OKLO or UEC?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, OKLO or UEC?
OKLO on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, OKLO or UEC?
UEC on the Momentum factor, by 8 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, OKLO or UEC?
OKLO is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. OKLO carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is OKLO more profitable than UEC?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 26.9% vs 42.3%; operating margin -180% vs -6.3%; ttm roe -7.1% vs -8.1%. OKLO leads on one measure and UEC on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is UEC's lead over OKLO getting stronger or weaker?
UEC lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 5 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-29 and 2026-10-28. The lead has changed hands 3 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-28, when UEC moved ahead of OKLO.
What would change the OKLO vs UEC verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: OKLO closes the Momentum gap — currently 8 points behind, the largest single contributor to UEC's edge; OKLO's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; UEC's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about OKLO and UEC?
OKLO: 1 bullish / 4 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. UEC: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on OKLO is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On UEC it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare OKLO and UEC with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.