OLED vs RMBS Stock Comparison
Compare OLED and RMBS across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between OLED and RMBS?
OLED leads the current stock comparison as Universal Display Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Universal Display Corporation vs Rambus Inc.
OLED leads
OLED leads by 5 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Risk Resilience, but the lead has narrowed from 11 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors RMBS on target upside.
Fragile: 4 of 6 evidence groups support OLED, and its lead is narrowing.
Universal Display Corporation
Rambus Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors OLED over RMBS, 55 versus 50 as of Sep 11, 2026. OLED's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and risk resilience, while RMBS holds the stronger quality profile. OLED also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors RMBS. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor OLED today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. OLED lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 11 to 5 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Universal Display Corporation and Rambus Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare OLED and RMBS against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value60 vs 40OLED +20
- Risk Resilience60 vs 45OLED +15
- Quality71 vs 77RMBS +6
- Momentum28 vs 31Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor OLED. OLED’s edge is concentrated in value and risk resilience; RMBS keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum +3
New signals
- 52-Week Low Proximity — bearish, risk, long horizon (1.9%)
Largest factor move: Momentum -6
No new signals fired.
OLED's lead widened by 1 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — OLED and RMBS both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
OLED (Universal Display Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and risk resilience.
RMBS (Rambus Inc.): the counter-case, on quality, fundamentals, analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 43% against 33.4%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
OLEDOLED on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
OLEDOLED on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
OLEDOLED on the peer-relative Value factor, by 20 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
OLEDOLED on Risk Resilience, by 15 points.
Analyst upside
RMBSRMBS on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors OLED, analyst targets favor RMBS. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | OLED | RMBS | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +46.2% | +86% | RMBS has more room |
| Target dispersion | +63.8% | +16.7% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 5 | 4 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor OLED. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | OLED | 55 vs 50 |
| Fundamentals | RMBSon balance | revenue growth 7% vs 15.1%; EPS growth 39.5% vs 14.5%; TTM ROE 11.4% vs 17.4%; gross margin 75.3% vs 78.3%; operating margin 34.1% vs 35.5% — RMBS takes 4 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | OLED | Value 60 vs 40 |
| Technicals | OLED | Price vs 50-day 0.2% vs -10.2%; vs 200-day -18.2% vs -20.9% |
| Risk Resilience | OLED | Risk Resilience 60 vs 45 |
| Analyst expectations | RMBS | Target upside 46.2% vs 86% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of OLED and RMBS and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on OLED.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10OLED lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 11 to 5 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- OLED +5
- 55 vs 50
- 7 sessions ago
- OLED +8
- 56 vs 48
- 30 sessions ago
- OLED +11
- 63 vs 52
- 90 sessions ago
- OLED +8
- 52 vs 44
The lead changed hands 7 times in this window, most recently on Jun 9 when OLED moved ahead of RMBS.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
0 bullish / 4 bearish / 1 neutral
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (18.97%)
- 52-Week Low Proximity — bearish, risk, long horizon (1.9%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (11.42%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (5.33%)
RMBS is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +2.96%, AIQ 0 points).
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +1.9%, AIQ -1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1RMBS closes the Value gap — currently 20 points behind, the largest single contributor to OLED's edge.
- 2RMBS's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3OLED starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 6 points over 30 sessions, and a further 5-point move would eliminate OLED's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
RMBS leads on balance| Metric | OLED | RMBS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 7% | 15.1% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 39.5% | 14.5% |
| Gross margin | 75.3% | 78.3% |
| Operating margin | 34.1% | 35.5% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 11.4% | 17.4% |
| Debt to equity | 0.01 | 0.01 |
Performance
RMBS leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | OLED | RMBS |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -2.9% | 0.7% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -11.8% | -15.5% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -7.3% | -38.2% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -17.6% | -7.8% |
| Year to date | -30.5% | -7.1% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -44.2% | 16.5% |
Technicals
OLED has the stronger structure| Metric | OLED | RMBS |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 36.6 | 35.8 |
| ADX (14) | 13.6 | 29.2 |
| Price vs 50-day | 0.2% | -10.2% |
| Price vs 200-day | -18.2% | -20.9% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 33.4% | 43% |
Risk
OLED is the more resilient| Metric | OLED | RMBS |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.34 | 3.51 |
| Sharpe ratio | -1.21 | 0.52 |
| Sortino ratio | -1.81 | 0.74 |
| Max drawdown | -48.5% | -51.5% |
| Current drawdown | -46.4% | -50% |
| Annualized volatility | 41.3% | 79.3% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -4.1% | -7.8% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, OLED or RMBS?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, OLED is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 55 against RMBS's 50. The edge comes from value and risk resilience. RMBS is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is OLED or RMBS the better buy right now?
OLED carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor OLED over RMBS?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. OLED leads Value by 20 points; OLED leads Risk Resilience by 15 points; RMBS leads Quality by 6 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, OLED or RMBS?
Analyst price targets imply +46.2% upside for OLED and +86% for RMBS, so the Street currently favors RMBS. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors OLED. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, OLED or RMBS?
OLED is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. OLED on the peer-relative Value factor, by 20 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, OLED or RMBS?
OLED on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, OLED or RMBS?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, OLED or RMBS?
OLED is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. OLED on Risk Resilience, by 15 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is OLED more profitable than RMBS?
RMBS leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 75.3% vs 78.3%; operating margin 34.1% vs 35.5%; ttm roe 11.4% vs 17.4%.
Is OLED's lead over RMBS getting stronger or weaker?
OLED lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 11 to 5 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 7 times in that window, most recently on 2026-06-09, when OLED moved ahead of RMBS.
What would change the OLED vs RMBS verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: RMBS closes the Value gap — currently 20 points behind, the largest single contributor to OLED's edge; RMBS's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; OLED starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 6 points over 30 sessions, and a further 5-point move would eliminate OLED's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about OLED and RMBS?
OLED: 0 bullish / 4 bearish / 1 neutral. RMBS: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on OLED is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On RMBS it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare OLED and RMBS with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.