OLED vs SIMO Stock Comparison
Compare OLED and SIMO across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between OLED and SIMO?
SIMO leads the current stock comparison as Silicon Motion Technology Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Universal Display Corporation vs Silicon Motion Technology Corporation
SIMO leads
SIMO leads by 8 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Quality, having only recently taken the lead back from OLED. Wall Street currently favors OLED on target upside.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support SIMO, the lead recently changed hands, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
Universal Display Corporation
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors SIMO over OLED, 63 versus 55 as of Sep 11, 2026. SIMO's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and quality, while OLED holds the stronger value profile. SIMO also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors OLED. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SIMO today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. SIMO lead: Reversed — OLED led by 6 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; SIMO now leads by 8.
Compare Universal Display Corporation and Silicon Motion Technology Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare OLED and SIMO against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum28 vs 78SIMO +50
- Value60 vs 38OLED +22
- Risk Resilience60 vs 45OLED +15
- Quality71 vs 83SIMO +12
3 of 6 evidence groups favor SIMO. SIMO’s edge is concentrated in momentum and quality; OLED keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum +3
New signals
- 52-Week Low Proximity — bearish, risk, long horizon (1.9%)
Largest factor move: Momentum -7
New signals
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
SIMO's lead narrowed by 1 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — OLED and SIMO both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
SIMO (Silicon Motion Technology Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and quality.
OLED (Universal Display Corporation): the counter-case, on value, risk resilience, valuation.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
SIMOSIMO on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
SIMOSIMO on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
OLEDOLED on the peer-relative Value factor, by 22 points.
Momentum
SIMOSIMO on the Momentum factor, by 50 points.
Lower downside
OLEDOLED on Risk Resilience, by 15 points.
Analyst upside
OLEDOLED on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors SIMO, analyst targets favor OLED. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | OLED | SIMO | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +46.2% | +1.9% | OLED has more room |
| Target dispersion | +63.8% | +75.9% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 5 | 4 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SIMO. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | SIMO | 55 vs 63 |
| Fundamentals | SIMOon balance | revenue growth 7% vs 31.8%; EPS growth 39.5% vs 102.5%; TTM ROE 11.4% vs 32%; gross margin 75.3% vs 48.9%; operating margin 34.1% vs 16.3% — SIMO takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | OLED | Value 60 vs 38 |
| Technicals | SIMO | Price vs 50-day 0.2% vs 7.3%; vs 200-day -18.2% vs 41.8% |
| Risk Resilience | OLED | Risk Resilience 60 vs 45 |
| Analyst expectations | OLED | Target upside 46.2% vs 1.9% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of OLED and SIMO and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 8 points.
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on SIMO.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10SIMO lead: Reversed — OLED led by 6 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; SIMO now leads by 8.
- Today
- SIMO +8
- 55 vs 63
- 7 sessions ago
- OLED +1
- 56 vs 55
- 30 sessions ago
- OLED +6
- 63 vs 57
- 90 sessions ago
- SIMO +5
- 52 vs 57
The lead changed hands 10 times in this window, most recently on Sep 8 when SIMO moved ahead of OLED.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
0 bullish / 4 bearish / 1 neutral
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (18.97%)
- 52-Week Low Proximity — bearish, risk, long horizon (1.9%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
4 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (41.64%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +2.96%, AIQ 0 points).
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +7.25%, AIQ -1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1OLED closes the Momentum gap — currently 50 points behind, the largest single contributor to SIMO's edge.
- 2OLED's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3SIMO's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
SIMO leads on balance| Metric | OLED | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 7% | 31.8% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 39.5% | 102.5% |
| Gross margin | 75.3% | 48.9% |
| Operating margin | 34.1% | 16.3% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 11.4% | 32% |
| Debt to equity | 0.01 | 0.06 |
Performance
SIMO leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | OLED | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -2.9% | 9.4% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -11.8% | 9.9% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -7.3% | 5.4% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -17.6% | 114.5% |
| Year to date | -30.5% | 186.1% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -44.2% | 212.6% |
Technicals
SIMO has the stronger structure| Metric | OLED | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 36.6 | 55.5 |
| ADX (14) | 13.6 | 10.6 |
| Price vs 50-day | 0.2% | 7.3% |
| Price vs 200-day | -18.2% | 41.8% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 33.4% | 78.2% |
Risk
OLED is the more resilient| Metric | OLED | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.34 | 2.33 |
| Sharpe ratio | -1.21 | 1.72 |
| Sortino ratio | -1.81 | 3.36 |
| Max drawdown | -48.5% | -37.8% |
| Current drawdown | -46.4% | -21.3% |
| Annualized volatility | 41.3% | 83.7% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -4.1% | -7.3% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, OLED or SIMO?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, SIMO is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 63 against OLED's 55. The edge comes from momentum and quality. OLED is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is OLED or SIMO the better buy right now?
SIMO carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor SIMO over OLED?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. SIMO leads Momentum by 50 points; OLED leads Value by 22 points; OLED leads Risk Resilience by 15 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, OLED or SIMO?
Analyst price targets imply +46.2% upside for OLED and +1.9% for SIMO, so the Street currently favors OLED. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors SIMO. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, OLED or SIMO?
OLED is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. OLED on the peer-relative Value factor, by 22 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, OLED or SIMO?
SIMO on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, OLED or SIMO?
SIMO on the Momentum factor, by 50 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, OLED or SIMO?
OLED is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. OLED on Risk Resilience, by 15 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is OLED more profitable than SIMO?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 75.3% vs 48.9%; operating margin 34.1% vs 16.3%; ttm roe 11.4% vs 32%. OLED leads on two measures and SIMO on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is SIMO's lead over OLED getting stronger or weaker?
SIMO lead: Reversed — OLED led by 6 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; SIMO now leads by 8. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 10 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-08, when SIMO moved ahead of OLED.
What would change the OLED vs SIMO verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: OLED closes the Momentum gap — currently 50 points behind, the largest single contributor to SIMO's edge; OLED's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; SIMO's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about OLED and SIMO?
OLED: 0 bullish / 4 bearish / 1 neutral. SIMO: 4 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. The most decision-relevant rule on OLED is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On SIMO it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare OLED and SIMO with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.