OMC vs VZ Stock Comparison
OMC currently leads VZ in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 57 vs 47. The clearest difference is momentum, while VZ has the stronger quality profile.
What is the main difference between OMC and VZ?
OMC leads the current stock comparison as Omnicom Group Inc., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Omnicom Group Inc. vs Verizon Communications Inc.
OMC leads
OMC leads by 10 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Risk Resilience, having only recently taken the lead back from VZ.
Fragile: 4 of 6 evidence groups support OMC, the lead recently changed hands, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Omnicom Group Inc.
Verizon Communications Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors OMC over VZ, 57 versus 47 as of Oct 21, 2026. OMC's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and risk resilience, while VZ holds the stronger quality profile. OMC also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor OMC today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. OMC lead: Reversed — VZ led by 3 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; OMC now leads by 10.
Compare Omnicom Group Inc. and Verizon Communications Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare OMC and VZ against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum81 vs 36OMC +45
- Risk Resilience58 vs 34OMC +24
- Quality25 vs 45VZ +20
- Value67 vs 64Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor OMC. OMC’s edge is concentrated in momentum and risk resilience; VZ keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +13
New signals
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum +2
New signals
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
OMC's lead widened by 3 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — OMC and VZ both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
OMC (Omnicom Group Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and risk resilience.
VZ (Verizon Communications Inc.): the counter-case, on quality, fundamentals — but at materially higher volatility, 41.3% against 21.4%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
OMCOMC on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
OMCOMC on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
OMCOMC on the Momentum factor, by 45 points.
Lower downside
OMCOMC on Risk Resilience, by 24 points.
Analyst upside
OMCOMC on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | OMC | VZ | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +24.8% | +10.2% | OMC has more room |
| Target dispersion | +62.7% | +19.8% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 4 | 6 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | OMC | VZ |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | 2.21% | 1.95% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $2.600 | $2.473 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $2.900 | $2.723 |
| Years increased | 2 | 5 |
| No cut in window | Yes | Yes |
| Cohort rank | #321 | #332 |
OMC grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 2.21% a year against VZ's 1.95%. Neither company reduced its regular dividend in any year of the window.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor OMC. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | OMC | 57 vs 47 |
| Fundamentals | VZon balance | EPS growth 2.5% vs -23.3%; TTM ROE 4.3% vs 15.5%; gross margin 17.5% vs 59.1%; operating margin 13.9% vs 20.5% — VZ takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | Even | Value 67 vs 64 |
| Technicals | OMC | Price vs 50-day -0.4% vs -8.7%; vs 200-day 3.8% vs -4.5% |
| Risk Resilience | OMC | Risk Resilience 58 vs 34 |
| Analyst expectations | OMC | Target upside 24.8% vs 10.2% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of OMC and VZ and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 10 points.
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on OMC.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20OMC lead: Reversed — VZ led by 3 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; OMC now leads by 10.
- Today
- OMC +10
- 57 vs 47
- 7 sessions ago
- OMC +8
- 53 vs 45
- 30 sessions ago
- VZ +3
- 42 vs 45
- 90 sessions ago
- VZ +4
- 50 vs 54
The lead changed hands 3 times in this window, most recently on Oct 8 when OMC moved ahead of VZ.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
5 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
Only OMC
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
Only VZ
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
Both carry 2 more signals that do not separate them: Golden Cross Active, MACD Bullish Crossover.
OMC leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 4 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -0.75%, AIQ +4 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -2.2%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1VZ closes the Momentum gap — currently 45 points behind, the largest single contributor to OMC's edge.
- 2VZ's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3OMC's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 5 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
VZ leads on balance| Metric | OMC | VZ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 5.1% | -0.5% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 2.5% | -23.3% |
| Gross margin | 17.5% | 59.1% |
| Operating margin | 13.9% | 20.5% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 4.3% | 15.5% |
| Debt to equity | 1.15 | 1.81 |
Performance
OMC leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | OMC | VZ |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 3.3% | 2.3% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 7.7% | -4.1% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 2.2% | 0.6% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 3.9% | -3.7% |
| Year to date | 0.4% | 9.4% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 5.1% | 10.4% |
Technicals
OMC has the stronger structure| Metric | OMC | VZ |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 81 | 43.4 |
| ADX (14) | 28.4 | 31.3 |
| Price vs 50-day | -0.4% | -8.7% |
| Price vs 200-day | 3.8% | -4.5% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 21.4% | 41.3% |
Risk
OMC is the more resilient| Metric | OMC | VZ |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.38 | -0.37 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.19 | 0.34 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.3 | 0.46 |
| Max drawdown | -18.7% | -19.1% |
| Current drawdown | -8.8% | -13.4% |
| Annualized volatility | 35.9% | 27.4% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3% | -2.4% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, OMC or VZ?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, OMC is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 57 against VZ's 47. The edge comes from momentum and risk resilience. VZ is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is OMC or VZ the better buy right now?
OMC carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor OMC over VZ?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. OMC leads Momentum by 45 points; OMC leads Risk Resilience by 24 points; VZ leads Quality by 20 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, OMC or VZ?
Analyst price targets imply +24.8% upside for OMC and +10.2% for VZ, so the Street currently favors OMC. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, OMC or VZ?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, OMC or VZ?
OMC on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, OMC or VZ?
OMC on the Momentum factor, by 45 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, OMC or VZ?
OMC is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. OMC on Risk Resilience, by 24 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is OMC more profitable than VZ?
VZ leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 17.5% vs 59.1%; operating margin 13.9% vs 20.5%; ttm roe 4.3% vs 15.5%.
Is OMC's lead over VZ getting stronger or weaker?
OMC lead: Reversed — VZ led by 3 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; OMC now leads by 10. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 3 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-08, when OMC moved ahead of VZ.
What would change the OMC vs VZ verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: VZ closes the Momentum gap — currently 45 points behind, the largest single contributor to OMC's edge; VZ's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; OMC's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 5 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about OMC and VZ?
OMC: 5 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. VZ: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on OMC is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On VZ it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare OMC and VZ with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.