OR vs RGLD Stock Comparison
RGLD currently leads OR in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 56 vs 54. The clearest difference is momentum, while OR has the stronger quality profile.
What is the main difference between OR and RGLD?
RGLD leads the current stock comparison as Royal Gold, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
OR Royalties Inc. vs Royal Gold, Inc.
RGLD leads
RGLD leads by 2 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum, having only recently taken the lead back from OR.
Fragile: 2 of 6 evidence groups support RGLD, the lead recently changed hands, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
OR Royalties Inc.
Royal Gold, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors RGLD over OR, 56 versus 54 as of Oct 31, 2026. RGLD's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum, while OR holds the stronger quality profile. RGLD also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor RGLD today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. RGLD lead: Reversed — OR led by 5 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; RGLD now leads by 2.
Compare OR Royalties Inc. and Royal Gold, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare OR and RGLD against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum41 vs 58RGLD +17
- Quality80 vs 71OR +9
- Value34 vs 36Even
- Risk Resilience63 vs 62Even
2 of 6 evidence groups favor RGLD. RGLD’s edge is concentrated in momentum; OR keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-28, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-27.
Largest factor move: Momentum -1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +7
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 2 active signals are unchanged.
RGLD's lead widened by 2 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — OR and RGLD both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
RGLD (Royal Gold, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum.
OR (OR Royalties Inc.): the counter-case, on quality, fundamentals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
RGLDRGLD on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
EvenGrowth figures are not covered for both names.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
RGLDRGLD on the Momentum factor, by 17 points.
Lower downside
OROR carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
RGLDRGLD on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | OR | RGLD | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +26.7% | +34.6% | RGLD has more room |
| Target dispersion | +27.3% | +18.2% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 3 | 6 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | OR | RGLD |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | 7.15% | 9.95% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $0.149 | $1.120 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $0.210 | $1.800 |
| Years increased | 4 | 5 |
| No cut in window | No (1) | Yes |
| Cohort rank | not ranked | #106 |
RGLD grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 9.95% a year against OR's 7.15%. RGLD never reduced its regular dividend in the window; OR did in 1 year.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor RGLD. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 54 vs 56 |
| Fundamentals | OR | revenue growth -3.5% vs -4%; EPS growth -15.4% vs -16%; TTM ROE 21.8% vs 11.5%; gross margin 84.5% vs 66.8%; operating margin 76.3% vs 63.1% |
| Valuation | Even | Value 34 vs 36 |
| Technicals | RGLD | Price vs 50-day -10.5% vs -7.3%; vs 200-day -7.5% vs 0.2% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 63 vs 62 |
| Analyst expectations | RGLD | Target upside 26.7% vs 34.6% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of OR and RGLD and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on RGLD.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 29 – Oct 28RGLD lead: Reversed — OR led by 5 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; RGLD now leads by 2.
- Today
- RGLD +2
- 54 vs 56
- 7 sessions ago
- OR +1
- 52 vs 51
- 30 sessions ago
- OR +5
- 50 vs 45
- 90 sessions ago
- RGLD +1
- 64 vs 65
The lead changed hands 4 times in this window, most recently on Sep 2 when OR moved ahead of RGLD.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
0 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral
Only OR
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (3.36%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
2 bullish / 0 bearish
Only RGLD
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (2.19%)
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -4.44%, AIQ 0 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -3.4%, AIQ +2 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1OR closes the Momentum gap — currently 17 points behind, the largest single contributor to RGLD's edge.
- 2OR's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3RGLD's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
OR leads on balance| Metric | OR | RGLD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -3.5% | -4% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -15.4% | -16% |
| Gross margin | 84.5% | 66.8% |
| Operating margin | 76.3% | 63.1% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 21.8% | 11.5% |
| Debt to equity | 0.15 | 0.05 |
Performance
RGLD leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | OR | RGLD |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -2.3% | 0% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -1% | 2.5% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 10.8% | 19.2% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -6.8% | 4.7% |
| Year to date | -3.9% | 8.8% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 1.9% | 32.6% |
Technicals
RGLD has the stronger structure| Metric | OR | RGLD |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 48.9 | 57.9 |
| ADX (14) | 11.7 | 17.3 |
| Price vs 50-day | -10.5% | -7.3% |
| Price vs 200-day | -7.5% | 0.2% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 33.4% | 34.5% |
Risk
Split| Metric | OR | RGLD |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.64 | 1.5 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.29 | 0.83 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.4 | 1.26 |
| Max drawdown | -41.2% | -38.4% |
| Current drawdown | -28.8% | -20.5% |
| Annualized volatility | 45.9% | 40.9% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -4.5% | -3.8% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, OR or RGLD?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, RGLD is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 56 against OR's 54. The edge comes from momentum. OR is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is OR or RGLD the better buy right now?
RGLD carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor RGLD over OR?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. RGLD leads Momentum by 17 points; OR leads Quality by 9 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, OR or RGLD?
Analyst price targets imply +26.7% upside for OR and +34.6% for RGLD, so the Street currently favors RGLD. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, OR or RGLD?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, OR or RGLD?
Growth figures are not covered for both names. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, OR or RGLD?
RGLD on the Momentum factor, by 17 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, OR or RGLD?
OR is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. OR carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is OR more profitable than RGLD?
OR leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 84.5% vs 66.8%; operating margin 76.3% vs 63.1%; ttm roe 21.8% vs 11.5%.
Is RGLD's lead over OR getting stronger or weaker?
RGLD lead: Reversed — OR led by 5 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; RGLD now leads by 2. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-29 and 2026-10-28. The lead has changed hands 4 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-02, when OR moved ahead of RGLD.
What would change the OR vs RGLD verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: OR closes the Momentum gap — currently 17 points behind, the largest single contributor to RGLD's edge; OR's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; RGLD's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about OR and RGLD?
OR: 0 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral. RGLD: 2 bullish / 0 bearish. The most decision-relevant rule on OR is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On RGLD it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare OR and RGLD with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.