OR vs SBSW Stock Comparison
Compare OR and SBSW across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between OR and SBSW?
OR leads the current stock comparison as OR Royalties Inc., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
OR Royalties Inc. vs Sibanye Stillwater Limited
OR leads
OR leads by 7 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Risk Resilience, but the lead has narrowed from 10 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors SBSW on target upside.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support OR, and its lead is narrowing.
OR Royalties Inc.
Sibanye Stillwater Limited
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors OR over SBSW, 56 versus 49 as of Sep 11, 2026. OR's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and risk resilience, while SBSW holds the stronger value profile. OR also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors SBSW. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor OR today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. OR lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 10 to 7 points over 30 sessions.
Compare OR Royalties Inc. and Sibanye Stillwater Limited across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare OR and SBSW against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality80 vs 26OR +54
- Value34 vs 63SBSW +29
- Momentum56 vs 61SBSW +5
- Risk Resilience55 vs 50OR +5
3 of 6 evidence groups favor OR. OR’s edge is concentrated in quality and risk resilience; SBSW keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -14
New signals
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum -15
New signals
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
OR's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — OR and SBSW both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
OR (OR Royalties Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and risk resilience.
SBSW (Sibanye Stillwater Limited): the counter-case, on value, momentum, valuation — but at materially higher volatility, 61.5% against 48.4%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
OROR on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
SBSWSBSW on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
SBSWSBSW on the peer-relative Value factor, by 29 points.
Momentum
SBSWSBSW on the Momentum factor, by 5 points.
Lower downside
OROR on Risk Resilience, by 5 points.
Analyst upside
SBSWSBSW on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors OR, analyst targets favor SBSW. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | OR | SBSW | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +11.9% | +13.6% | SBSW has more room |
| Target dispersion | +27.3% | +31.6% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 3 | 2 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor OR. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | OR | 56 vs 49 |
| Fundamentals | ORon balance | revenue growth -3.5% vs 30.3%; EPS growth -15.4% vs 57.5%; TTM ROE 21.8% vs -12.9%; gross margin 84.5% vs 27.5%; operating margin 76.3% vs 23.4% — OR takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | SBSW | Value 34 vs 63 |
| Technicals | SBSW | Price vs 50-day 10.4% vs 23.1%; vs 200-day -2.8% vs -1.2% |
| Risk Resilience | OR | Risk Resilience 55 vs 50 |
| Analyst expectations | SBSW | Target upside 11.9% vs 13.6% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of OR and SBSW and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 7 points.
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on OR.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10OR lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 10 to 7 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- OR +7
- 56 vs 49
- 7 sessions ago
- OR +8
- 61 vs 53
- 30 sessions ago
- OR +10
- 62 vs 52
- 90 sessions ago
- OR +8
- 48 vs 40
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
0 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (12.99%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (3.66%)
0 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (24.89%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (4.28%)
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 4 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +0.53%, AIQ -4 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -0.24%, AIQ -4 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1SBSW closes the Quality gap — currently 54 points behind, the largest single contributor to OR's edge.
- 2SBSW's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3OR starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 3 points over 30 sessions, and a further 7-point move would eliminate OR's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
OR leads on balance| Metric | OR | SBSW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -3.5% | 30.3% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -15.4% | 57.5% |
| Gross margin | 84.5% | 27.5% |
| Operating margin | 76.3% | 23.4% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 21.8% | -12.9% |
| Debt to equity | 0.15 | 1.11 |
Performance
SBSW leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | OR | SBSW |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -2.6% | 0.1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 6.3% | 17.4% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 13.9% | 38.4% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -16.6% | -9.6% |
| Year to date | 1.3% | -11.8% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 2.4% | 39.4% |
Technicals
SBSW has the stronger structure| Metric | OR | SBSW |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 52.3 | 57.8 |
| ADX (14) | 28.4 | 36.5 |
| Price vs 50-day | 10.4% | 23.1% |
| Price vs 200-day | -2.8% | -1.2% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 48.4% | 61.5% |
Risk
OR is the more resilient| Metric | OR | SBSW |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.44 | 2.55 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.23 | 0.86 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.31 | 1.27 |
| Max drawdown | -41.2% | -62.1% |
| Current drawdown | -24.9% | -40.5% |
| Annualized volatility | 47.7% | 67.6% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -5% | -6.7% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, OR or SBSW?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, OR is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 56 against SBSW's 49. The edge comes from quality and risk resilience. SBSW is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is OR or SBSW the better buy right now?
OR carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor OR over SBSW?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. OR leads Quality by 54 points; SBSW leads Value by 29 points; SBSW leads Momentum by 5 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, OR or SBSW?
Analyst price targets imply +11.9% upside for OR and +13.6% for SBSW, so the Street currently favors SBSW. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors OR. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, OR or SBSW?
SBSW is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. SBSW on the peer-relative Value factor, by 29 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, OR or SBSW?
SBSW on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, OR or SBSW?
SBSW on the Momentum factor, by 5 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, OR or SBSW?
OR is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. OR on Risk Resilience, by 5 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is OR more profitable than SBSW?
OR leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 84.5% vs 27.5%; operating margin 76.3% vs 23.4%; ttm roe 21.8% vs -12.9%.
Is OR's lead over SBSW getting stronger or weaker?
OR lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 10 to 7 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the OR vs SBSW verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: SBSW closes the Quality gap — currently 54 points behind, the largest single contributor to OR's edge; SBSW's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; OR starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 3 points over 30 sessions, and a further 7-point move would eliminate OR's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about OR and SBSW?
OR: 0 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral. SBSW: 0 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral. The most decision-relevant rule on OR is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On SBSW it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare OR and SBSW with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.