ORA vs PLUG Stock Comparison
ORA currently leads PLUG in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 36 vs 28. The clearest difference is momentum, while PLUG has the stronger value profile.
What is the main difference between ORA and PLUG?
ORA leads the current stock comparison as Ormat Technologies, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Ormat Technologies, Inc. vs Plug Power Inc.
ORA leads
ORA leads by 8 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Quality, and the lead has widened from 2 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors PLUG on target upside.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support ORA, its lead is widening, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Ormat Technologies, Inc.
Plug Power Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors ORA over PLUG, 36 versus 28 as of Oct 31, 2026. ORA's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and quality, while PLUG holds the stronger value profile. ORA also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors PLUG. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor ORA today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader is throwing conflicting signals. ORA lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 2 to 8 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Ormat Technologies, Inc. and Plug Power Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare ORA and PLUG against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum50 vs 25ORA +25
- Value26 vs 46PLUG +20
- Quality28 vs 9ORA +19
- Risk Resilience48 vs 33ORA +15
4 of 6 evidence groups favor ORA. ORA’s edge is concentrated in momentum and quality; PLUG keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-28, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-27.
Largest factor move: Momentum +3
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
No factor moved materially.
New signals
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
ORA's lead widened by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — ORA and PLUG both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
ORA (Ormat Technologies, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and quality.
PLUG (Plug Power Inc.): the counter-case, on value, valuation, analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 44.4% against 38.2%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
ORAORA on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
PLUGPLUG on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
PLUGPLUG on the peer-relative Value factor, by 20 points.
Momentum
ORAORA on the Momentum factor, by 25 points.
Lower downside
ORAORA on Risk Resilience, by 15 points.
Analyst upside
PLUGPLUG on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors ORA, analyst targets favor PLUG. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | ORA | PLUG | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +45.2% | +75.8% | PLUG has more room |
| Target dispersion | +39.9% | +158.3% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 7 | 3 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor ORA. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | ORA | 36 vs 28 |
| Fundamentals | ORAon balance | revenue growth -35.9% vs 9%; EPS growth -38.9% vs 22.2%; TTM ROE 5% vs -176.2%; gross margin 27.9% vs -18.5%; operating margin 14.9% vs -70.2% — ORA takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | PLUG | Value 26 vs 46 |
| Technicals | ORA | Price vs 50-day -6.3% vs -27.9%; vs 200-day -18% vs -41% |
| Risk Resilience | ORA | Risk Resilience 48 vs 33 |
| Analyst expectations | PLUG | Target upside 45.2% vs 75.8% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of ORA and PLUG and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 8 points.
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on ORA.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 29 – Oct 28ORA lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 2 to 8 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- ORA +8
- 36 vs 28
- 7 sessions ago
- ORA +4
- 32 vs 28
- 30 sessions ago
- ORA +2
- 30 vs 28
- 90 sessions ago
- PLUG +1
- 31 vs 32
The lead changed hands 7 times in this window, most recently on Sep 22 when PLUG moved ahead of ORA.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only ORA
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only PLUG
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (6.18%)
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Both carry 3 more signals that do not separate them: Death Cross Active, Downtrend Structure Active, MACD Bullish Crossover.
ORA leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -2.74%, AIQ +1 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -3.87%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1PLUG closes the Momentum gap — currently 25 points behind, the largest single contributor to ORA's edge.
- 2PLUG's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3ORA's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
ORA leads on balance| Metric | ORA | PLUG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -35.9% | 9% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -38.9% | 22.2% |
| Gross margin | 27.9% | -18.5% |
| Operating margin | 14.9% | -70.2% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 5% | -176.2% |
| Debt to equity | 1.31 | 1.41 |
Performance
ORA leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | ORA | PLUG |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 2.5% | 0.7% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 0.2% | -26.8% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -5.2% | -32.1% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -16.9% | -56.7% |
| Year to date | -17% | -27.9% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -13.8% | -51.9% |
Technicals
ORA has the stronger structure| Metric | ORA | PLUG |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 57.1 | 22.3 |
| ADX (14) | 22 | 42.2 |
| Price vs 50-day | -6.3% | -27.9% |
| Price vs 200-day | -18% | -41% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 38.2% | 44.4% |
Risk
ORA is the more resilient| Metric | ORA | PLUG |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.92 | 2.26 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.31 | -0.52 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.49 | -1 |
| Max drawdown | -40.3% | -66.9% |
| Current drawdown | -36.8% | -65.7% |
| Annualized volatility | 37.6% | 79.1% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.5% | -7.4% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, ORA or PLUG?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, ORA is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 36 against PLUG's 28. The edge comes from momentum and quality. PLUG is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is ORA or PLUG the better buy right now?
ORA carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor ORA over PLUG?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. ORA leads Momentum by 25 points; PLUG leads Value by 20 points; ORA leads Quality by 19 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, ORA or PLUG?
Analyst price targets imply +45.2% upside for ORA and +75.8% for PLUG, so the Street currently favors PLUG. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors ORA. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, ORA or PLUG?
PLUG is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. PLUG on the peer-relative Value factor, by 20 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, ORA or PLUG?
PLUG on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, ORA or PLUG?
ORA on the Momentum factor, by 25 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, ORA or PLUG?
ORA is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. ORA on Risk Resilience, by 15 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is ORA more profitable than PLUG?
ORA leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 27.9% vs -18.5%; operating margin 14.9% vs -70.2%; ttm roe 5% vs -176.2%.
Is ORA's lead over PLUG getting stronger or weaker?
ORA lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 2 to 8 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-29 and 2026-10-28. The lead has changed hands 7 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-22, when PLUG moved ahead of ORA.
What would change the ORA vs PLUG verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: PLUG closes the Momentum gap — currently 25 points behind, the largest single contributor to ORA's edge; PLUG's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; ORA's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about ORA and PLUG?
ORA: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. PLUG: 2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on ORA is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On PLUG it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare ORA and PLUG with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.