ORA vs PLUG Stock Comparison
Compare ORA and PLUG across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between ORA and PLUG?
PLUG leads the current stock comparison as Plug Power Inc., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Ormat Technologies, Inc. vs Plug Power Inc.
PLUG leads
PLUG leads by 2 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Momentum, having only recently taken the lead back from ORA.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support PLUG, the lead recently changed hands, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Ormat Technologies, Inc.
Plug Power Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors PLUG over ORA, 31 versus 29 as of Sep 11, 2026. PLUG's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and momentum, while ORA holds the stronger quality profile. PLUG also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor PLUG today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. PLUG lead: Reversed — ORA led by 5 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; PLUG now leads by 2.
Compare Ormat Technologies, Inc. and Plug Power Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare ORA and PLUG against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value26 vs 46PLUG +20
- Quality28 vs 9ORA +19
- Momentum25 vs 38PLUG +13
- Risk Resilience43 vs 31ORA +12
3 of 6 evidence groups favor PLUG. PLUG’s edge is concentrated in value and momentum; ORA keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -2
New signals
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
PLUG's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — ORA and PLUG both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
PLUG (Plug Power Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and momentum.
ORA (Ormat Technologies, Inc.): the counter-case, on quality, risk resilience, fundamentals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
PLUGPLUG on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
PLUGPLUG on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
PLUGPLUG on the peer-relative Value factor, by 20 points.
Momentum
PLUGPLUG on the Momentum factor, by 13 points.
Lower downside
ORAORA on Risk Resilience, by 12 points.
Analyst upside
PLUGPLUG on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | ORA | PLUG | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +40.6% | +49% | PLUG has more room |
| Target dispersion | +30% | +107% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 6 | 3 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor PLUG. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 29 vs 31 |
| Fundamentals | ORAon balance | revenue growth -35.9% vs 9%; EPS growth -38.9% vs 22.2%; TTM ROE 5% vs -176.2%; gross margin 27.9% vs -18.5%; operating margin 14.9% vs -70.2% — ORA takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | PLUG | Value 26 vs 46 |
| Technicals | PLUG | Price vs 50-day -10.4% vs -5.1%; vs 200-day -16.2% vs -14.8% |
| Risk Resilience | ORA | Risk Resilience 43 vs 31 |
| Analyst expectations | PLUG | Target upside 40.6% vs 49% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of ORA and PLUG and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on PLUG.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10PLUG lead: Reversed — ORA led by 5 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; PLUG now leads by 2.
- Today
- PLUG +2
- 29 vs 31
- 7 sessions ago
- ORA +1
- 31 vs 30
- 30 sessions ago
- ORA +5
- 38 vs 33
- 90 sessions ago
- PLUG +1
- 27 vs 28
The lead changed hands 6 times in this window, most recently on Sep 9 when PLUG moved ahead of ORA.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 4 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (8.94%)
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (11.86%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (6.04%)
PLUG leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -1.82%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.47%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1ORA closes the Value gap — currently 20 points behind, the largest single contributor to PLUG's edge.
- 2ORA's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3PLUG's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
ORA leads on balance| Metric | ORA | PLUG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -35.9% | 9% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -38.9% | 22.2% |
| Gross margin | 27.9% | -18.5% |
| Operating margin | 14.9% | -70.2% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 5% | -176.2% |
| Debt to equity | 1.31 | 1.41 |
Performance
PLUG leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | ORA | PLUG |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -7.7% | 1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -14.8% | -7.9% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -27.4% | -26.2% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -10.8% | -5.4% |
| Year to date | -11.6% | 7.1% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 6.7% | 46.5% |
Technicals
PLUG has the stronger structure| Metric | ORA | PLUG |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 33.2 | 45.4 |
| ADX (14) | 21.9 | 13.3 |
| Price vs 50-day | -10.4% | -5.1% |
| Price vs 200-day | -16.2% | -14.8% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 44% | 53.7% |
Risk
ORA is the more resilient| Metric | ORA | PLUG |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.87 | 2.42 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.26 | 0.83 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.38 | 1.88 |
| Max drawdown | -35% | -56.7% |
| Current drawdown | -33.4% | -49% |
| Annualized volatility | 36.3% | 97.9% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.5% | -8.2% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, ORA or PLUG?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, PLUG is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 31 against ORA's 29. The edge comes from value and momentum. ORA is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is ORA or PLUG the better buy right now?
PLUG carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor PLUG over ORA?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. PLUG leads Value by 20 points; ORA leads Quality by 19 points; PLUG leads Momentum by 13 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, ORA or PLUG?
Analyst price targets imply +40.6% upside for ORA and +49% for PLUG, so the Street currently favors PLUG. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, ORA or PLUG?
PLUG is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. PLUG on the peer-relative Value factor, by 20 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, ORA or PLUG?
PLUG on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, ORA or PLUG?
PLUG on the Momentum factor, by 13 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, ORA or PLUG?
ORA is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. ORA on Risk Resilience, by 12 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is ORA more profitable than PLUG?
ORA leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 27.9% vs -18.5%; operating margin 14.9% vs -70.2%; ttm roe 5% vs -176.2%.
Is PLUG's lead over ORA getting stronger or weaker?
PLUG lead: Reversed — ORA led by 5 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; PLUG now leads by 2. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 6 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-09, when PLUG moved ahead of ORA.
What would change the ORA vs PLUG verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: ORA closes the Value gap — currently 20 points behind, the largest single contributor to PLUG's edge; ORA's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; PLUG's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about ORA and PLUG?
ORA: 1 bullish / 4 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. PLUG: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on ORA is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On PLUG it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare ORA and PLUG with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.