OTIS vs PH Stock Comparison
Compare OTIS and PH across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between OTIS and PH?
OTIS leads the current stock comparison as Otis Worldwide Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Otis Worldwide Corporation vs Parker-Hannifin Corporation
OTIS leads
OTIS leads by 4 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Momentum, having only recently taken the lead back from PH.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support OTIS, the lead recently changed hands, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Otis Worldwide Corporation
Parker-Hannifin Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors OTIS over PH, 47 versus 43 as of Sep 11, 2026. OTIS's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and momentum, while PH holds the stronger quality profile. OTIS also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor OTIS today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. OTIS lead: Reversed — PH led by 7 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; OTIS now leads by 4.
Compare Otis Worldwide Corporation and Parker-Hannifin Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare OTIS and PH against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value66 vs 40OTIS +26
- Quality44 vs 64PH +20
- Momentum24 vs 9OTIS +15
- Risk Resilience53 vs 63PH +10
3 of 6 evidence groups favor OTIS. OTIS’s edge is concentrated in value and momentum; PH keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -3
New signals
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum -6
No new signals fired.
OTIS's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — OTIS and PH both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
OTIS (Otis Worldwide Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and momentum.
PH (Parker-Hannifin Corporation): the counter-case, on quality, risk resilience, fundamentals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
OTISOTIS on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
OTISOTIS on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
OTISOTIS on the peer-relative Value factor, by 26 points.
Momentum
OTISOTIS on the Momentum factor, by 15 points.
Lower downside
PHPH on Risk Resilience, by 10 points.
Analyst upside
OTISOTIS on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | OTIS | PH | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +29.7% | +19% | OTIS has more room |
| Target dispersion | +33.5% | +36.1% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 6 | 9 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor OTIS. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | OTIS | 47 vs 43 |
| Fundamentals | PHon balance | revenue growth 8.2% vs 4.9%; EPS growth 26.1% vs 20.9%; TTM ROE -27.3% vs 25.1%; gross margin 30.2% vs 37.7%; operating margin 15.4% vs 21.6% — PH takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | OTIS | Value 66 vs 40 |
| Technicals | PH | Price vs 50-day -4.2% vs -4%; vs 200-day -14.8% vs -0.4% |
| Risk Resilience | PH | Risk Resilience 53 vs 63 |
| Analyst expectations | OTIS | Target upside 29.7% vs 19% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of OTIS and PH and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on OTIS.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10OTIS lead: Reversed — PH led by 7 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; OTIS now leads by 4.
- Today
- OTIS +4
- 47 vs 43
- 7 sessions ago
- OTIS +8
- 52 vs 44
- 30 sessions ago
- PH +7
- 51 vs 58
- 90 sessions ago
- PH +2
- 56 vs 58
The lead changed hands 6 times in this window, most recently on Aug 26 when OTIS moved ahead of PH.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 5 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (10.50%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
1 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (5.52%)
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
OTIS leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +1.78%, AIQ -1 points).
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +1.7%, AIQ -1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1PH closes the Value gap — currently 26 points behind, the largest single contributor to OTIS's edge.
- 2PH's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3OTIS's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 5 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
PH leads on balance| Metric | OTIS | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 8.2% | 4.9% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 26.1% | 20.9% |
| Gross margin | 30.2% | 37.7% |
| Operating margin | 15.4% | 21.6% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -27.3% | 25.1% |
| Debt to equity | -1.54 | 0.57 |
Performance
PH leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | OTIS | PH |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -4.2% | -1.6% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -8.2% | -12.6% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -2.5% | 6.7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -19.8% | -0.7% |
| Year to date | -20.3% | 6.3% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -22.3% | 23.6% |
Technicals
PH has the stronger structure| Metric | OTIS | PH |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 29.3 | 31.2 |
| ADX (14) | 12.3 | 22.3 |
| Price vs 50-day | -4.2% | -4% |
| Price vs 200-day | -14.8% | -0.4% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 19.1% | 21.6% |
Risk
PH is the more resilient| Metric | OTIS | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.31 | 0.82 |
| Sharpe ratio | -1.29 | 0.79 |
| Sortino ratio | -1.99 | 1.37 |
| Max drawdown | -27.5% | -19.5% |
| Current drawdown | -27.5% | -13% |
| Annualized volatility | 21.4% | 26.5% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.1% | -2.3% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, OTIS or PH?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, OTIS is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 47 against PH's 43. The edge comes from value and momentum. PH is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is OTIS or PH the better buy right now?
OTIS carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor OTIS over PH?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. OTIS leads Value by 26 points; PH leads Quality by 20 points; OTIS leads Momentum by 15 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, OTIS or PH?
Analyst price targets imply +29.7% upside for OTIS and +19% for PH, so the Street currently favors OTIS. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, OTIS or PH?
OTIS is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. OTIS on the peer-relative Value factor, by 26 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, OTIS or PH?
OTIS on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, OTIS or PH?
OTIS on the Momentum factor, by 15 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, OTIS or PH?
PH is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. PH on Risk Resilience, by 10 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is OTIS more profitable than PH?
PH leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 30.2% vs 37.7%; operating margin 15.4% vs 21.6%; ttm roe -27.3% vs 25.1%.
Is OTIS's lead over PH getting stronger or weaker?
OTIS lead: Reversed — PH led by 7 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; OTIS now leads by 4. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 6 times in that window, most recently on 2026-08-26, when OTIS moved ahead of PH.
What would change the OTIS vs PH verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: PH closes the Value gap — currently 26 points behind, the largest single contributor to OTIS's edge; PH's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; OTIS's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 5 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about OTIS and PH?
OTIS: 2 bullish / 5 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. PH: 1 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on OTIS is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On PH it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare OTIS and PH with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.