OTTR vs POR Stock Comparison
OTTR currently leads POR in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 60 vs 46. The clearest difference is momentum.
What is the main difference between OTTR and POR?
OTTR leads the current stock comparison as Otter Tail Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Otter Tail Corporation vs Portland General Electric Company
OTTR leads
OTTR leads by 14 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Quality, and the lead has widened from 10 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors POR on target upside.
Stable: 5 of 6 evidence groups support OTTR, its lead is widening, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
Otter Tail Corporation
Portland General Electric Company
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors OTTR over POR, 60 versus 46 as of Oct 31, 2026. OTTR's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and quality. OTTR also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors POR. 5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor OTTR today, and the comparison is rated Stable on stability. OTTR lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 10 to 14 points over 30 sessions. OTTR leads on all four AIQ factor dimensions. Value is itself one of those four, so a sweep is not explained by valuation alone — it deserves additional scrutiny for unmodeled catalysts, expectations or event risk.
Compare Otter Tail Corporation and Portland General Electric Company across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare OTTR and POR against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum68 vs 35OTTR +33
- Quality48 vs 37OTTR +11
- Risk Resilience65 vs 56OTTR +9
- Value64 vs 59OTTR +5
5 of 6 evidence groups favor OTTR. OTTR’s edge is concentrated in momentum and quality.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-28, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-27.
Largest factor move: Momentum -7
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum -6
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
OTTR's lead narrowed by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — OTTR and POR both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
OTTR (Otter Tail Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and quality.
POR (Portland General Electric Company): the counter-case, on analyst expectations.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
OTTROTTR on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
PORPOR on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
OTTROTTR on the peer-relative Value factor, by 5 points.
Momentum
OTTROTTR on the Momentum factor, by 33 points.
Lower downside
OTTROTTR on Risk Resilience, by 9 points.
Analyst upside
PORPOR on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors OTTR, analyst targets favor POR. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | OTTR | POR | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | -10.3% | +18.2% | POR has more room |
| Target dispersion | 0% | +19% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 1 | 2 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | OTTR | POR |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | 7.25% | 5.54% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $1.480 | $1.585 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $2.100 | $2.075 |
| Years increased | 5 | 5 |
| No cut in window | Yes | Yes |
| Cohort rank | #176 | #227 |
OTTR grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 7.25% a year against POR's 5.54%. Neither company reduced its regular dividend in any year of the window.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor OTTR. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | OTTR | 60 vs 46 |
| Fundamentals | OTTRon balance | revenue growth -3.6% vs -10.5%; EPS growth -110.4% vs 43.9%; TTM ROE 10.4% vs 6.3%; gross margin 40% vs 44.4%; operating margin 17.1% vs 15.5% — OTTR takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | OTTR | Value 64 vs 59 |
| Technicals | OTTR | Price vs 50-day 1% vs -4.9%; vs 200-day 1% vs -11.6% |
| Risk Resilience | OTTR | Risk Resilience 65 vs 56 |
| Analyst expectations | POR | Target upside -10.3% vs 18.2% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of OTTR and POR and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion rests on a wide gap and broad agreement. It is unlikely to turn on a single session.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 14 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- 5 of 6 covered evidence groups point the same way. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on OTTR.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 29 – Oct 28OTTR lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 10 to 14 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- OTTR +14
- 60 vs 46
- 7 sessions ago
- OTTR +13
- 61 vs 48
- 30 sessions ago
- OTTR +10
- 53 vs 43
- 90 sessions ago
- OTTR +6
- 57 vs 51
The lead changed hands 2 times in this window, most recently on Jul 10 when OTTR moved ahead of POR.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
4 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
Only OTTR
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (0.79%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
1 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only POR
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (7.17%)
- 52-Week Low Proximity — bearish, risk, long horizon (1.8%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
Both carry 2 more signals that do not separate them: Bollinger Band Squeeze, MACD Bullish Crossover.
POR is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.08%, AIQ -2 points).
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +0.52%, AIQ -1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1POR closes the Momentum gap — currently 33 points behind, the largest single contributor to OTTR's edge.
- 2POR's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3OTTR's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
OTTR leads on balance| Metric | OTTR | POR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -3.6% | -10.5% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -110.4% | 43.9% |
| Gross margin | 40% | 44.4% |
| Operating margin | 17.1% | 15.5% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 10.4% | 6.3% |
| Debt to equity | 0.67 | 1.26 |
Performance
OTTR leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | OTTR | POR |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -0.2% | 0.8% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 1.8% | -0.8% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 0.3% | -11.6% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 1.7% | -13.3% |
| Year to date | 10.9% | -7.8% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 14.1% | -3.3% |
Technicals
OTTR has the stronger structure| Metric | OTTR | POR |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 57.4 | 41.6 |
| ADX (14) | 10.5 | 25.1 |
| Price vs 50-day | 1% | -4.9% |
| Price vs 200-day | 1% | -11.6% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 12.6% | 17.5% |
Risk
OTTR is the more resilient| Metric | OTTR | POR |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.12 | -0.08 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.58 | -0.28 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.92 | -0.42 |
| Max drawdown | -9% | -19.8% |
| Current drawdown | -4.9% | -18.4% |
| Annualized volatility | 20.9% | 19.6% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.1% | -1.9% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, OTTR or POR?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, OTTR is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 60 against POR's 46. The edge comes from momentum and quality. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is OTTR or POR the better buy right now?
OTTR carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Stable — 5 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Stable rating means the gap is wide and the evidence is broad, so the conclusion is unlikely to turn on a single session.
Why does the AIQ Score favor OTTR over POR?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. OTTR leads Momentum by 33 points; OTTR leads Quality by 11 points; OTTR leads Risk Resilience by 9 points. OTTR leads on all four AIQ factor dimensions. Value is itself one of those four, so the sweep is not explained by POR simply being cheaper — it warrants extra scrutiny for unmodeled catalysts, forward expectations or event risk the factors do not capture.
Which has more analyst upside, OTTR or POR?
Analyst price targets imply -10.3% upside for OTTR and +18.2% for POR, so the Street currently favors POR. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors OTTR. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, OTTR or POR?
OTTR is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. OTTR on the peer-relative Value factor, by 5 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, OTTR or POR?
POR on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, OTTR or POR?
OTTR on the Momentum factor, by 33 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, OTTR or POR?
OTTR is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. OTTR on Risk Resilience, by 9 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is OTTR more profitable than POR?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 40% vs 44.4%; operating margin 17.1% vs 15.5%; ttm roe 10.4% vs 6.3%. OTTR leads on two measures and POR on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is OTTR's lead over POR getting stronger or weaker?
OTTR lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 10 to 14 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-29 and 2026-10-28. The lead has changed hands 2 times in that window, most recently on 2026-07-10, when OTTR moved ahead of POR.
What would change the OTTR vs POR verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: POR closes the Momentum gap — currently 33 points behind, the largest single contributor to OTTR's edge; POR's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; OTTR's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about OTTR and POR?
OTTR: 4 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. POR: 1 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on OTTR is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On POR it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare OTTR and POR with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.