PAAS vs SBSW Stock Comparison
Compare PAAS and SBSW across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between PAAS and SBSW?
PAAS leads the current stock comparison as Pan American Silver Corp., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Pan American Silver Corp. vs Sibanye Stillwater Limited
PAAS leads
PAAS leads by 7 AIQ points, primarily on Quality.
Competitive: 3 of 6 evidence groups support PAAS.
Pan American Silver Corp.
Sibanye Stillwater Limited
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors PAAS over SBSW, 56 versus 49 as of Sep 11, 2026. PAAS's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality, while SBSW holds the stronger value profile. PAAS also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor PAAS today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. PAAS lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 7 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Pan American Silver Corp. and Sibanye Stillwater Limited across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare PAAS and SBSW against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality68 vs 26PAAS +42
- Value51 vs 63SBSW +12
- Momentum51 vs 61SBSW +10
- Risk Resilience50 vs 50Even
3 of 6 evidence groups favor PAAS. PAAS’s edge is concentrated in quality; SBSW keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -16
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum -15
New signals
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
PAAS's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — PAAS and SBSW both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
PAAS (Pan American Silver Corp.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality.
SBSW (Sibanye Stillwater Limited): the counter-case, on value, momentum, valuation.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
PAASPAAS on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
SBSWSBSW on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
SBSWSBSW on the peer-relative Value factor, by 12 points.
Momentum
SBSWSBSW on the Momentum factor, by 10 points.
Lower downside
SBSWSBSW carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
PAASPAAS on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | PAAS | SBSW | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +45% | +13.6% | PAAS has more room |
| Target dispersion | +56.2% | +31.6% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 3 | 2 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor PAAS. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | PAAS | 56 vs 49 |
| Fundamentals | PAASon balance | revenue growth -5.1% vs 30.3%; EPS growth -35.2% vs 57.5%; TTM ROE 19.5% vs -12.9%; gross margin 44.6% vs 27.5%; operating margin 39.2% vs 23.4% — PAAS takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | SBSW | Value 51 vs 63 |
| Technicals | SBSW | Price vs 50-day 5.8% vs 23.1%; vs 200-day -3.6% vs -1.2% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 50 vs 50 |
| Analyst expectations | PAAS | Target upside 45% vs 13.6% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of PAAS and SBSW and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 7 points.
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on PAAS.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10PAAS lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 7 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- PAAS +7
- 56 vs 49
- 7 sessions ago
- PAAS +5
- 58 vs 53
- 30 sessions ago
- PAAS +7
- 59 vs 52
- 90 sessions ago
- PAAS +8
- 48 vs 40
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
0 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (10.48%)
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (4.27%)
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
0 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (24.89%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (4.28%)
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -0.61%, AIQ -4 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -0.24%, AIQ -4 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1SBSW closes the Quality gap — currently 42 points behind, the largest single contributor to PAAS's edge.
- 2SBSW's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3PAAS starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
PAAS leads on balance| Metric | PAAS | SBSW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -5.1% | 30.3% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -35.2% | 57.5% |
| Gross margin | 44.6% | 27.5% |
| Operating margin | 39.2% | 23.4% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 19.5% | -12.9% |
| Debt to equity | 0.11 | 1.11 |
Performance
SBSW leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | PAAS | SBSW |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -1.7% | 0.1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -3.3% | 17.4% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 14.7% | 38.4% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -16.7% | -9.6% |
| Year to date | -2.2% | -11.8% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 41.7% | 39.4% |
Technicals
SBSW has the stronger structure| Metric | PAAS | SBSW |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 46.7 | 57.8 |
| ADX (14) | 22.6 | 36.5 |
| Price vs 50-day | 5.8% | 23.1% |
| Price vs 200-day | -3.6% | -1.2% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 62.6% | 61.5% |
Risk
Split| Metric | PAAS | SBSW |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.92 | 2.55 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.84 | 0.86 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.2 | 1.27 |
| Max drawdown | -39.2% | -62.1% |
| Current drawdown | -26.3% | -40.5% |
| Annualized volatility | 58.5% | 67.6% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -6.1% | -6.7% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, PAAS or SBSW?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, PAAS is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 56 against SBSW's 49. The edge comes from quality. SBSW is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is PAAS or SBSW the better buy right now?
PAAS carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor PAAS over SBSW?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. PAAS leads Quality by 42 points; SBSW leads Value by 12 points; SBSW leads Momentum by 10 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, PAAS or SBSW?
Analyst price targets imply +45% upside for PAAS and +13.6% for SBSW, so the Street currently favors PAAS. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, PAAS or SBSW?
SBSW is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. SBSW on the peer-relative Value factor, by 12 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, PAAS or SBSW?
SBSW on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, PAAS or SBSW?
SBSW on the Momentum factor, by 10 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, PAAS or SBSW?
SBSW is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. SBSW carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is PAAS more profitable than SBSW?
PAAS leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 44.6% vs 27.5%; operating margin 39.2% vs 23.4%; ttm roe 19.5% vs -12.9%.
Is PAAS's lead over SBSW getting stronger or weaker?
PAAS lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 7 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the PAAS vs SBSW verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: SBSW closes the Quality gap — currently 42 points behind, the largest single contributor to PAAS's edge; SBSW's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; PAAS starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about PAAS and SBSW?
PAAS: 0 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral. SBSW: 0 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral. The most decision-relevant rule on PAAS is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On SBSW it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare PAAS and SBSW with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.