PDM vs SLG Stock Comparison
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. vs SL Green Realty Corp.
PDM leads
PDM leads by 3 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Value, having only recently taken the lead back from SLG.
Fragile: 2 of 6 evidence groups support PDM, the lead recently changed hands, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
SL Green Realty Corp.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors PDM over SLG, 52 versus 49 as of Sep 5, 2026. PDM's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and value, while SLG holds the stronger quality profile. PDM also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor PDM today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. PDM lead: Reversed — SLG led by 1 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; PDM now leads by 3.
Compare Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. and SL Green Realty Corp. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Compare PDM and SLG against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum25%68 vs 55PDM +13
- Quality30%20 vs 30SLG +10
- Value30%73 vs 63PDM +10
- Risk Resilience15%50 vs 48Even
2 of 6 evidence groups favor PDM. PDM’s edge is concentrated in momentum and value; SLG keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-03, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-02.
Largest factor move: Momentum +4
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum +3
No new signals fired.
PDM's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — PDM and SLG both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
PDM (Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and value.
SLG (SL Green Realty Corp.): the counter-case, on quality, fundamentals, technicals — but at materially higher volatility, 29.7% against 21.3%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
PDMPDM on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value at 30% each.
Growth
SLGSLG on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
PDMPDM on the peer-relative Value factor, by 10 points.
Momentum
PDMPDM on the Momentum factor, by 13 points.
Lower downside
PDMPDM carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
PDMPDM on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | PDM | SLG | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +6.7% | +1.2% | PDM has more room |
| Target dispersion | +9.7% | +58.7% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 2 | 8 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor PDM. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 52 vs 49 |
| Fundamentals | SLG | EPS growth 11.3% vs 68.3%; TTM ROE -5.4% vs -4.6%; gross margin 28.6% vs 51.1%; operating margin 23.3% vs 40.9% |
| Valuation | PDM | Value 73 vs 63 |
| Technicals | SLG | Price vs 50-day 0.9% vs 3.1%; vs 200-day 14.8% vs 19.5% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 50 vs 48 |
| Analyst expectations | PDM | Target upside 6.7% vs 1.2% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of PDM and SLG and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on PDM.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Apr 22 – Sep 3PDM lead: Reversed — SLG led by 1 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; PDM now leads by 3.
- Today
- PDM +3
- 52 vs 49
- 7 sessions ago
- PDM +1
- 52 vs 51
- 30 sessions ago
- SLG +1
- 49 vs 50
- 90 sessions ago
- PDM +1
- 49 vs 48
The lead changed hands 5 times in this window, most recently on Aug 26 when PDM moved ahead of SLG.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
3 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (13.65%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
3 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (17.33%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
PDM leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -0.1%, AIQ +1 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +1.18%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1SLG closes the Momentum gap — currently 13 points behind, the largest single contributor to PDM's edge.
- 2SLG's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3PDM's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — the composite weights Quality and Value at 30% each, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
SLG leads on balance| Metric | PDM | SLG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 0.6% | 4.3% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 11.3% | 68.3% |
| Gross margin | 28.6% | 51.1% |
| Operating margin | 23.3% | 40.9% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -5.4% | -4.6% |
| Debt to equity | 1.54 | 1.51 |
Technicals
SLG has the stronger structure| Metric | PDM | SLG |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 57.4 | 44.7 |
| ADX (14) | 11.9 | 33 |
| Price vs 50-day | 0.9% | 3.1% |
| Price vs 200-day | 14.8% | 19.5% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 21.3% | 29.7% |
Risk
Split| Metric | PDM | SLG |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.65 | 0.92 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.43 | -0.09 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.61 | -0.15 |
| Max drawdown | -29.5% | -46.2% |
| Current drawdown | -2.7% | -16.4% |
| Annualized volatility | 31.2% | 38% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.2% | -3.6% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, PDM or SLG?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, PDM is the stronger of the two as of Sep 5, 2026, scoring 52 against SLG's 49. The edge comes from momentum and value. SLG is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is PDM or SLG the better buy right now?
PDM carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 5, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor PDM over SLG?
The composite weights Quality at 30%, Value at 30%, Momentum at 25% and Risk Resilience at 15%. PDM leads Momentum by 13 points; SLG leads Quality by 10 points; PDM leads Value by 10 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, PDM or SLG?
Analyst price targets imply +6.7% upside for PDM and +1.2% for SLG, so the Street currently favors PDM. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, PDM or SLG?
PDM is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. PDM on the peer-relative Value factor, by 10 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, PDM or SLG?
SLG on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, PDM or SLG?
PDM on the Momentum factor, by 13 points. Momentum carries 25% of the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, PDM or SLG?
PDM is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. PDM carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. The Risk Resilience factor weights 15% of the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is PDM more profitable than SLG?
SLG leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 28.6% vs 51.1%; operating margin 23.3% vs 40.9%; ttm roe -5.4% vs -4.6%.
Is PDM's lead over SLG getting stronger or weaker?
PDM lead: Reversed — SLG led by 1 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; PDM now leads by 3. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-04-22 and 2026-09-03. The lead has changed hands 5 times in that window, most recently on 2026-08-26, when PDM moved ahead of SLG.
What would change the PDM vs SLG verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: SLG closes the Momentum gap — currently 13 points behind, the largest single contributor to PDM's edge; SLG's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; PDM's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — the composite weights Quality and Value at 30% each, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about PDM and SLG?
PDM: 3 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. SLG: 3 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on PDM is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On SLG it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare PDM and SLG with others
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality (30%), Value (30%), Momentum (25%) and Risk (15%). Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.