PDM vs VNO Stock Comparison
PDM currently leads VNO in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 49 vs 39. The clearest difference is value, while VNO has the stronger quality profile.
What is the main difference between PDM and VNO?
PDM leads the current stock comparison as Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. vs Vornado Realty Trust
PDM leads
PDM leads by 10 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Momentum, and the lead has widened from 3 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors VNO on target upside.
Competitive: 3 of 6 evidence groups support PDM, its lead is widening, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Vornado Realty Trust
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors PDM over VNO, 49 versus 39 as of Oct 21, 2026. PDM's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and momentum, while VNO holds the stronger quality profile. PDM also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors VNO. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor PDM today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. PDM lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 3 to 10 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. and Vornado Realty Trust across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare PDM and VNO against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value73 vs 46PDM +27
- Momentum57 vs 37PDM +20
- Quality20 vs 27VNO +7
- Risk Resilience47 vs 54VNO +7
3 of 6 evidence groups favor PDM. PDM’s edge is concentrated in value and momentum; VNO keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +8
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 2 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +8
New signals
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
PDM's lead narrowed by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — PDM and VNO both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
PDM (Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and momentum.
VNO (Vornado Realty Trust): the counter-case, on quality, risk resilience, fundamentals.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
PDMPDM on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
VNOVNO on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
PDMPDM on the peer-relative Value factor, by 27 points.
Momentum
PDMPDM on the Momentum factor, by 20 points.
Lower downside
VNOVNO on Risk Resilience, by 7 points.
Analyst upside
VNOVNO on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors PDM, analyst targets favor VNO. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | PDM | VNO | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +13.5% | +14.9% | VNO has more room |
| Target dispersion | +9.5% | +39.7% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 2 | 9 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | PDM | VNO |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | -31.68% | -20.84% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $0.840 | $2.380 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $0.125 | $0.740 |
| Years increased | 1 | 1 |
| No cut in window | No (4) | No (2) |
| Cohort rank | not ranked | not ranked |
VNO grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — -20.84% a year against PDM's -31.68%.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor PDM. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | PDM | 49 vs 39 |
| Fundamentals | VNOon balance | revenue growth 0.6% vs 0.7%; EPS growth 11.3% vs 173.2%; TTM ROE -5.4% vs 1.1%; gross margin 28.6% vs 42.6%; operating margin 23.3% vs 10.9% — VNO takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | PDM | Value 73 vs 46 |
| Technicals | PDM | Price vs 50-day -0.9% vs -7.7%; vs 200-day 8% vs -0.7% |
| Risk Resilience | VNO | Risk Resilience 47 vs 54 |
| Analyst expectations | VNO | Target upside 13.5% vs 14.9% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of PDM and VNO and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 10 points.
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on PDM.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20PDM lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 3 to 10 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- PDM +10
- 49 vs 39
- 7 sessions ago
- PDM +8
- 46 vs 38
- 30 sessions ago
- PDM +3
- 44 vs 41
- 90 sessions ago
- PDM +8
- 45 vs 37
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 0 bearish
No signal that the other name lacks.
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
Only VNO
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
Both carry 2 more signals that do not separate them: Golden Cross Active, MACD Bullish Crossover.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price 0%, AIQ +1 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -0.66%, AIQ +2 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1VNO closes the Value gap — currently 27 points behind, the largest single contributor to PDM's edge.
- 2VNO's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3PDM's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
VNO leads on balance| Metric | PDM | VNO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 0.6% | 0.7% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 11.3% | 173.2% |
| Gross margin | 28.6% | 42.6% |
| Operating margin | 23.3% | 10.9% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -5.4% | 1.1% |
| Debt to equity | 1.54 | 1.57 |
Performance
PDM leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | PDM | VNO |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 1.6% | -2.1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -1.3% | -6.2% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -3.3% | -14% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 14.5% | 13.9% |
| Year to date | 10.9% | -0.5% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 13.5% | -16.2% |
Technicals
PDM has the stronger structure| Metric | PDM | VNO |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 60.6 | 43.9 |
| ADX (14) | 23.7 | 30.1 |
| Price vs 50-day | -0.9% | -7.7% |
| Price vs 200-day | 8% | -0.7% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 26.3% | 28.2% |
Risk
VNO is the more resilient| Metric | PDM | VNO |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.68 | 1 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.43 | -0.48 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.64 | -0.79 |
| Max drawdown | -27.9% | -37.7% |
| Current drawdown | -7.1% | -19.1% |
| Annualized volatility | 31.6% | 32.4% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.3% | -3.5% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, PDM or VNO?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, PDM is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 49 against VNO's 39. The edge comes from value and momentum. VNO is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is PDM or VNO the better buy right now?
PDM carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor PDM over VNO?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. PDM leads Value by 27 points; PDM leads Momentum by 20 points; VNO leads Quality by 7 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, PDM or VNO?
Analyst price targets imply +13.5% upside for PDM and +14.9% for VNO, so the Street currently favors VNO. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors PDM. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, PDM or VNO?
PDM is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. PDM on the peer-relative Value factor, by 27 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, PDM or VNO?
VNO on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, PDM or VNO?
PDM on the Momentum factor, by 20 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, PDM or VNO?
VNO is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. VNO on Risk Resilience, by 7 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is PDM more profitable than VNO?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 28.6% vs 42.6%; operating margin 23.3% vs 10.9%; ttm roe -5.4% vs 1.1%. PDM leads on one measure and VNO on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is PDM's lead over VNO getting stronger or weaker?
PDM lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 3 to 10 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the PDM vs VNO verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: VNO closes the Value gap — currently 27 points behind, the largest single contributor to PDM's edge; VNO's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; PDM's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about PDM and VNO?
PDM: 2 bullish / 0 bearish. VNO: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. The most decision-relevant rule on PDM is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On VNO it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare PDM and VNO with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.