PEG vs PNW Stock Comparison
PNW currently leads PEG in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 56 vs 54. The clearest difference is momentum, while PEG has the stronger quality profile.
What is the main difference between PEG and PNW?
PNW leads the current stock comparison as Pinnacle West Capital Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated vs Pinnacle West Capital Corporation
PNW leads
PNW leads by 2 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum. Wall Street currently favors PEG on target upside.
Fragile: 2 of 6 evidence groups support PNW, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated
Pinnacle West Capital Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors PNW over PEG, 56 versus 54 as of Oct 31, 2026. PNW's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum, while PEG holds the stronger quality profile. PNW also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors PEG. 2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor PNW today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. PNW lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 2 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated and Pinnacle West Capital Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare PEG and PNW against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum59 vs 79PNW +20
- Quality50 vs 40PEG +10
- Value53 vs 55Even
- Risk Resilience53 vs 52Even
2 of 6 evidence groups favor PNW. PNW’s edge is concentrated in momentum; PEG keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-28, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-27.
Largest factor move: Momentum -2, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 3 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum -1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
PNW's lead was unchanged in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — PEG and PNW both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
PNW (Pinnacle West Capital Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum.
PEG (Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated): the counter-case, on quality, analyst expectations.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
PNWPNW on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
PNWPNW on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
PNWPNW on the Momentum factor, by 20 points.
Lower downside
PNWPNW carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
PEGPEG on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors PNW, analyst targets favor PEG. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | PEG | PNW | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +14.5% | -2.6% | PEG has more room |
| Target dispersion | +17.6% | +35.7% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 6 | 7 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | PEG | PNW |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | 5.15% | 2.50% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $1.960 | $3.178 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $2.520 | $3.595 |
| Years increased | 5 | 5 |
| No cut in window | Yes | Yes |
| Cohort rank | #246 | #316 |
PEG grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 5.15% a year against PNW's 2.50%. Neither company reduced its regular dividend in any year of the window.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor PNW. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 54 vs 56 |
| Fundamentals | PNWon balance | revenue growth -33.6% vs 26.6%; EPS growth -55% vs 4.4%; TTM ROE 11.7% vs 9%; gross margin 85.4% vs 55.5%; operating margin 23.1% vs 27% — PNW takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | Even | Value 53 vs 55 |
| Technicals | PNW | Price vs 50-day 4.3% vs 8.4%; vs 200-day -7.2% vs 4.6% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 53 vs 52 |
| Analyst expectations | PEG | Target upside 14.5% vs -2.6% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of PEG and PNW and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on PNW.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 29 – Oct 28PNW lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 2 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- PNW +2
- 54 vs 56
- 7 sessions ago
- PNW +1
- 56 vs 57
- 30 sessions ago
- PNW +1
- 51 vs 52
- 90 sessions ago
- PEG +3
- 49 vs 46
The lead changed hands 4 times in this window, most recently on Oct 1 when PNW moved ahead of PEG.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only PEG
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
3 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
Only PNW
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
Both carry 2 more signals that do not separate them: Death Cross Active, MACD Bullish Crossover.
PNW leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.9%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.34%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1PEG closes the Momentum gap — currently 20 points behind, the largest single contributor to PNW's edge.
- 2PEG's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3PNW's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
PNW leads on balance| Metric | PEG | PNW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -33.6% | 26.6% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -55% | 4.4% |
| Gross margin | 85.4% | 55.5% |
| Operating margin | 23.1% | 27% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 11.7% | 9% |
| Debt to equity | 1.42 | 1.62 |
Performance
PNW leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | PEG | PNW |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 2.1% | 0.9% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 7.6% | 12.7% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -6.6% | 3.5% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -8.9% | 3.1% |
| Year to date | -9.8% | 18.2% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -12.8% | 13.8% |
Technicals
PNW has the stronger structure| Metric | PEG | PNW |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 53.4 | 69.4 |
| ADX (14) | 20.2 | 32.9 |
| Price vs 50-day | 4.3% | 8.4% |
| Price vs 200-day | -7.2% | 4.6% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 22.5% | 19.9% |
Risk
Split| Metric | PEG | PNW |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.07 | -0.13 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.73 | 0.71 |
| Sortino ratio | -1.11 | 1.23 |
| Max drawdown | -23.4% | -16.7% |
| Current drawdown | -16.6% | -4.1% |
| Annualized volatility | 18.8% | 17.1% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.1% | -1.7% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, PEG or PNW?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, PNW is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 56 against PEG's 54. The edge comes from momentum. PEG is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is PEG or PNW the better buy right now?
PNW carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor PNW over PEG?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. PNW leads Momentum by 20 points; PEG leads Quality by 10 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, PEG or PNW?
Analyst price targets imply +14.5% upside for PEG and -2.6% for PNW, so the Street currently favors PEG. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors PNW. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, PEG or PNW?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, PEG or PNW?
PNW on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, PEG or PNW?
PNW on the Momentum factor, by 20 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, PEG or PNW?
PNW is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. PNW carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is PEG more profitable than PNW?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 85.4% vs 55.5%; operating margin 23.1% vs 27%; ttm roe 11.7% vs 9%. PEG leads on two measures and PNW on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is PNW's lead over PEG getting stronger or weaker?
PNW lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 2 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-29 and 2026-10-28. The lead has changed hands 4 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-01, when PNW moved ahead of PEG.
What would change the PEG vs PNW verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: PEG closes the Momentum gap — currently 20 points behind, the largest single contributor to PNW's edge; PEG's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; PNW's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about PEG and PNW?
PEG: 1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. PNW: 3 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on PEG is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On PNW it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare PEG and PNW with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.