PEG vs PPL Stock Comparison
Compare PEG and PPL across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between PEG and PPL?
PEG leads the current stock comparison as Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated, with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated vs PPL Corporation
PEG leads
PEG leads by 6 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Value, and the lead has widened from 3 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 2 of 6 evidence groups support PEG, its lead is widening, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated
PPL Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors PEG over PPL, 47 versus 41 as of Sep 11, 2026. PEG's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and value. PEG also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor PEG today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. PEG lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 3 to 6 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated and PPL Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare PEG and PPL against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality50 vs 34PEG +16
- Value53 vs 48PEG +5
- Momentum31 vs 32Even
- Risk Resilience56 vs 57Even
2 of 6 evidence groups favor PEG. PEG’s edge is concentrated in quality and value.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum +2
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum -1
New signals
- 52-Week Low Proximity — bearish, risk, long horizon (3.0%)
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
PEG's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — PEG and PPL both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
PEG (Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and value.
PPL (PPL Corporation): the counter-case, on fundamentals, technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
PEGPEG on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
PPLPPL on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
PEGPEG on the peer-relative Value factor, by 5 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
PEGPEG carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
EvenAnalyst targets are level or not covered for both names.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | PEG | PPL | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +20% | +20.3% | Level |
| Target dispersion | +17.3% | +26.8% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 4 | 8 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor PEG. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | PEG | 47 vs 41 |
| Fundamentals | PPLon balance | revenue growth -33.6% vs -23.9%; EPS growth -55% vs -48.3%; TTM ROE 11.7% vs 8.5%; gross margin 85.4% vs 34.6%; operating margin 23.1% vs 24% — PPL takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | PEG | Value 53 vs 48 |
| Technicals | PPL | Price vs 50-day -5.6% vs -3.8%; vs 200-day -9.2% vs -5.7% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 56 vs 57 |
| Analyst expectations | Even | Target upside 20% vs 20.3% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of PEG and PPL and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 6 points.
- Only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on PEG.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10PEG lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 3 to 6 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- PEG +6
- 47 vs 41
- 7 sessions ago
- PEG +6
- 47 vs 41
- 30 sessions ago
- PEG +3
- 46 vs 43
- 90 sessions ago
- PEG +9
- 56 vs 47
The lead changed hands once in this window, most recently on Aug 14 when PPL moved ahead of PEG.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (4.06%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- 52-Week Low Proximity — bearish, risk, long horizon (0.2%)
0 bullish / 4 bearish / 1 neutral
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (2.39%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- 52-Week Low Proximity — bearish, risk, long horizon (3.0%)
PEG leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.12%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.38%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1PPL closes the Quality gap — currently 16 points behind, the largest single contributor to PEG's edge.
- 2PPL's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3PEG's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 3 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
PPL leads on balance| Metric | PEG | PPL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -33.6% | -23.9% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -55% | -48.3% |
| Gross margin | 85.4% | 34.6% |
| Operating margin | 23.1% | 24% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 11.7% | 8.5% |
| Debt to equity | 1.42 | 1.32 |
Performance
PPL leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | PEG | PPL |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -1.1% | -1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -4.5% | -3.5% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -7.8% | -3.9% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -11.9% | -9.1% |
| Year to date | -8.8% | -1.8% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -9.6% | -4% |
Technicals
PPL has the stronger structure| Metric | PEG | PPL |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 36.8 | 38.6 |
| ADX (14) | 23.9 | 11.8 |
| Price vs 50-day | -5.6% | -3.8% |
| Price vs 200-day | -9.2% | -5.7% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 15.2% | 17% |
Risk
Split| Metric | PEG | PPL |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.1 | -0.03 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.65 | -0.37 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.99 | -0.59 |
| Max drawdown | -16.6% | -14.3% |
| Current drawdown | -16.6% | -14.1% |
| Annualized volatility | 18.5% | 17.9% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.1% | -1.8% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, PEG or PPL?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, PEG is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 47 against PPL's 41. The edge comes from quality and value. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is PEG or PPL the better buy right now?
PEG carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor PEG over PPL?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. PEG leads Quality by 16 points; PEG leads Value by 5 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, PEG or PPL?
Analyst price targets imply +20% upside for PEG and +20.3% for PPL. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, PEG or PPL?
PEG is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. PEG on the peer-relative Value factor, by 5 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, PEG or PPL?
PPL on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, PEG or PPL?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, PEG or PPL?
PEG is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. PEG carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is PEG more profitable than PPL?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 85.4% vs 34.6%; operating margin 23.1% vs 24%; ttm roe 11.7% vs 8.5%. PEG leads on two measures and PPL on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is PEG's lead over PPL getting stronger or weaker?
PEG lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 3 to 6 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands once in that window, most recently on 2026-08-14, when PPL moved ahead of PEG.
What would change the PEG vs PPL verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: PPL closes the Quality gap — currently 16 points behind, the largest single contributor to PEG's edge; PPL's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; PEG's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 3 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about PEG and PPL?
PEG: 1 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. PPL: 0 bullish / 4 bearish / 1 neutral. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on PEG is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On PPL it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare PEG and PPL with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.