PLD vs REXR Stock Comparison
Compare PLD and REXR across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between PLD and REXR?
REXR leads the current stock comparison as Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Prologis, Inc. vs Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc.
REXR leads
REXR leads by 12 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Quality. Wall Street currently favors PLD on target upside.
Competitive: 3 of 6 evidence groups support REXR.
Prologis, Inc.
Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors REXR over PLD, 50 versus 38 as of Sep 11, 2026. REXR's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and quality. REXR also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors PLD. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor REXR today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. REXR lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 12 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Prologis, Inc. and Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare PLD and REXR against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum25 vs 61REXR +36
- Quality41 vs 51REXR +10
- Value34 vs 38REXR +4
- Risk Resilience59 vs 56Even
3 of 6 evidence groups favor REXR. REXR’s edge is concentrated in momentum and quality.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -1
New signals
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum +5
No new signals fired.
REXR's lead widened by 1 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — PLD and REXR both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
REXR (Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and quality.
PLD (Prologis, Inc.): the counter-case, on analyst expectations.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
REXRREXR on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
PLDPLD on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
REXRREXR on the peer-relative Value factor, by 4 points.
Momentum
REXRREXR on the Momentum factor, by 36 points.
Lower downside
PLDPLD carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
PLDPLD on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors REXR, analyst targets favor PLD. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | PLD | REXR | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +13.9% | +0.5% | PLD has more room |
| Target dispersion | +22.6% | +20.9% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 13 | 6 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor REXR. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | REXR | 38 vs 50 |
| Fundamentals | Even | EPS growth 8.6% vs -6.9%; TTM ROE 7.9% vs -4.8%; gross margin 29.1% vs 61%; operating margin 38.4% vs 39.6% |
| Valuation | REXR | Value 34 vs 38 |
| Technicals | REXR | Price vs 50-day -4.4% vs 3.9%; vs 200-day -1.2% vs 0.2% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 59 vs 56 |
| Analyst expectations | PLD | Target upside 13.9% vs 0.5% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of PLD and REXR and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 12 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on REXR.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10REXR lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 12 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- REXR +12
- 38 vs 50
- 7 sessions ago
- REXR +10
- 41 vs 51
- 30 sessions ago
- REXR +11
- 39 vs 50
- 90 sessions ago
- REXR +3
- 43 vs 46
The lead changed hands 4 times in this window, most recently on Jun 24 when REXR moved ahead of PLD.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (3.23%)
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
0 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (0.84%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
PLD is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +1%, AIQ 0 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +2.81%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1PLD closes the Momentum gap — currently 36 points behind, the largest single contributor to REXR's edge.
- 2PLD's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3REXR starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | PLD | REXR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 5.6% | 0.2% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 8.6% | -6.9% |
| Gross margin | 29.1% | 61% |
| Operating margin | 38.4% | 39.6% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 7.9% | -4.8% |
| Debt to equity | 0.68 | 0.45 |
Performance
REXR leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | PLD | REXR |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -1.6% | 1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -4.5% | 1.7% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -4.4% | 7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 0% | 4.9% |
| Year to date | 5.3% | -4.4% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 18.9% | -13.7% |
Technicals
REXR has the stronger structure| Metric | PLD | REXR |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 32 | 49.3 |
| ADX (14) | 19.4 | 16.3 |
| Price vs 50-day | -4.4% | 3.9% |
| Price vs 200-day | -1.2% | 0.2% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 14.8% | 18.3% |
Risk
Split| Metric | PLD | REXR |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.46 | 0.56 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.77 | -0.6 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.22 | -1.02 |
| Max drawdown | -10.4% | -26.6% |
| Current drawdown | -10.4% | -16.4% |
| Annualized volatility | 21.7% | 25.2% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.2% | -2% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, PLD or REXR?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, REXR is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 50 against PLD's 38. The edge comes from momentum and quality. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is PLD or REXR the better buy right now?
REXR carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor REXR over PLD?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. REXR leads Momentum by 36 points; REXR leads Quality by 10 points; REXR leads Value by 4 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, PLD or REXR?
Analyst price targets imply +13.9% upside for PLD and +0.5% for REXR, so the Street currently favors PLD. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors REXR. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, PLD or REXR?
REXR is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. REXR on the peer-relative Value factor, by 4 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, PLD or REXR?
PLD on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, PLD or REXR?
REXR on the Momentum factor, by 36 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, PLD or REXR?
PLD is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. PLD carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is PLD more profitable than REXR?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 29.1% vs 61%; operating margin 38.4% vs 39.6%; ttm roe 7.9% vs -4.8%. PLD leads on one measure and REXR on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is REXR's lead over PLD getting stronger or weaker?
REXR lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 12 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 4 times in that window, most recently on 2026-06-24, when REXR moved ahead of PLD.
What would change the PLD vs REXR verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: PLD closes the Momentum gap — currently 36 points behind, the largest single contributor to REXR's edge; PLD's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; REXR starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about PLD and REXR?
PLD: 2 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted. REXR: 0 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on PLD is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On REXR it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare PLD and REXR with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.