PLNT vs PVH Stock Comparison
PVH currently leads PLNT in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 63 vs 54. The clearest difference is value, while PLNT has the stronger quality profile.
What is the main difference between PLNT and PVH?
PVH leads the current stock comparison as PVH Corp., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Planet Fitness, Inc. vs PVH Corp.
PVH leads
PVH leads by 9 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Risk Resilience, but the lead has narrowed from 18 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors PLNT on target upside.
Competitive: 5 of 6 evidence groups support PVH, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Planet Fitness, Inc.
PVH Corp.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors PVH over PLNT, 63 versus 54 as of Oct 21, 2026. PVH's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and risk resilience, while PLNT holds the stronger quality profile. PVH also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors PLNT. 5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor PVH today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader's advantage has been narrowing. PVH lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 18 to 9 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Planet Fitness, Inc. and PVH Corp. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare PLNT and PVH against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value44 vs 73PVH +29
- Risk Resilience38 vs 47PVH +9
- Quality53 vs 46PLNT +7
- Momentum76 vs 81PVH +5
5 of 6 evidence groups favor PVH. PVH’s edge is concentrated in value and risk resilience; PLNT keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience +1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience +1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 6 active signals are unchanged.
PVH's lead was unchanged in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — PLNT and PVH both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
PVH (PVH Corp.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and risk resilience.
PLNT (Planet Fitness, Inc.): the counter-case, on quality, analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 51.2% against 29.5%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
PVHPVH on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
PVHPVH on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
PVHPVH on the peer-relative Value factor, by 29 points.
Momentum
PVHPVH on the Momentum factor, by 5 points.
Lower downside
PVHPVH on Risk Resilience, by 9 points.
Analyst upside
PLNTPLNT on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors PVH, analyst targets favor PLNT. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | PLNT | PVH | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +42.7% | +15.5% | PLNT has more room |
| Target dispersion | +116.6% | +53.8% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 14 | 6 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor PVH. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | PVH | 54 vs 63 |
| Fundamentals | PVHon balance | revenue growth 8.3% vs -19.2%; EPS growth 33.8% vs 157.5%; TTM ROE -53.6% vs 3.3%; gross margin 50.3% vs 57.5%; operating margin 30.7% vs 6.9% — PVH takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | PVH | Value 44 vs 73 |
| Technicals | PVH | Price vs 50-day 6.7% vs 8.6%; vs 200-day -18.1% vs 12.5% |
| Risk Resilience | PVH | Risk Resilience 38 vs 47 |
| Analyst expectations | PLNT | Target upside 42.7% vs 15.5% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of PLNT and PVH and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 9 points.
- 5 of 6 covered evidence groups point the same way. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on PVH.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20PVH lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 18 to 9 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- PVH +9
- 54 vs 63
- 7 sessions ago
- PVH +10
- 53 vs 63
- 30 sessions ago
- PVH +18
- 40 vs 58
- 90 sessions ago
- PVH +6
- 42 vs 48
The lead changed hands 6 times in this window, most recently on Aug 26 when PLNT moved ahead of PVH.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only PLNT
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (32.14%)
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (3.69%)
5 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
Only PVH
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (0.10%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
Both carry 3 more signals that do not separate them: Keltner Channel Breakout, RSI Overbought, MACD Bullish Crossover.
PVH leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -2.4%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -3.36%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1PLNT closes the Value gap — currently 29 points behind, the largest single contributor to PVH's edge.
- 2PLNT's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3PVH's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 5 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 9 points over 30 sessions, and a further 9-point move would eliminate PVH's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
PVH leads on balance| Metric | PLNT | PVH |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 8.3% | -19.2% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 33.8% | 157.5% |
| Gross margin | 50.3% | 57.5% |
| Operating margin | 30.7% | 6.9% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -53.6% | 3.3% |
| Debt to equity | -4.82 | 0.86 |
Performance
PVH leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | PLNT | PVH |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 11.6% | 4.5% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 20.4% | 14% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -2% | 8% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -26.4% | -12.5% |
| Year to date | -51.2% | 29.1% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -43.4% | 5.8% |
Technicals
PVH has the stronger structure| Metric | PLNT | PVH |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 76.2 | 84.3 |
| ADX (14) | 24.9 | 26.1 |
| Price vs 50-day | 6.7% | 8.6% |
| Price vs 200-day | -18.1% | 12.5% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 51.2% | 29.5% |
Risk
PVH is the more resilient| Metric | PLNT | PVH |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.27 | 1.14 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.95 | 0.28 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.97 | 0.34 |
| Max drawdown | -63.8% | -30.7% |
| Current drawdown | -52.7% | -12.5% |
| Annualized volatility | 50.4% | 46.8% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.7% | -4% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, PLNT or PVH?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, PVH is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 63 against PLNT's 54. The edge comes from value and risk resilience. PLNT is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is PLNT or PVH the better buy right now?
PVH carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 5 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor PVH over PLNT?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. PVH leads Value by 29 points; PVH leads Risk Resilience by 9 points; PLNT leads Quality by 7 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, PLNT or PVH?
Analyst price targets imply +42.7% upside for PLNT and +15.5% for PVH, so the Street currently favors PLNT. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors PVH. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, PLNT or PVH?
PVH is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. PVH on the peer-relative Value factor, by 29 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, PLNT or PVH?
PVH on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, PLNT or PVH?
PVH on the Momentum factor, by 5 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, PLNT or PVH?
PVH is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. PVH on Risk Resilience, by 9 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is PLNT more profitable than PVH?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 50.3% vs 57.5%; operating margin 30.7% vs 6.9%; ttm roe -53.6% vs 3.3%. PLNT leads on one measure and PVH on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is PVH's lead over PLNT getting stronger or weaker?
PVH lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 18 to 9 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 6 times in that window, most recently on 2026-08-26, when PLNT moved ahead of PVH.
What would change the PLNT vs PVH verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: PLNT closes the Value gap — currently 29 points behind, the largest single contributor to PVH's edge; PLNT's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; PVH's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 5 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 9 points over 30 sessions, and a further 9-point move would eliminate PVH's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about PLNT and PVH?
PLNT: 2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. PVH: 5 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on PLNT is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On PVH it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare PLNT and PVH with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.