PLUG vs SEDG Stock Comparison
Compare PLUG and SEDG across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between PLUG and SEDG?
SEDG leads the current stock comparison as SolarEdge Technologies, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Plug Power Inc. vs SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
SEDG leads
SEDG leads by 16 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Quality, and the lead has widened from 6 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors PLUG on target upside.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support SEDG, its lead is widening, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Plug Power Inc.
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors SEDG over PLUG, 47 versus 31 as of Sep 11, 2026. SEDG's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and quality. SEDG also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors PLUG. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SEDG today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader is throwing conflicting signals. SEDG lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 6 to 16 points over 30 sessions. SEDG leads on all four AIQ factor dimensions. Value is itself one of those four, so a sweep is not explained by valuation alone — it deserves additional scrutiny for unmodeled catalysts, expectations or event risk.
Compare Plug Power Inc. and SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare PLUG and SEDG against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum38 vs 62SEDG +24
- Quality9 vs 26SEDG +17
- Risk Resilience31 vs 43SEDG +12
- Value46 vs 57SEDG +11
4 of 6 evidence groups favor SEDG. SEDG’s edge is concentrated in momentum and quality.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum +9
New signals
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
SEDG's lead widened by 2 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — PLUG and SEDG both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
SEDG (SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and quality.
PLUG (Plug Power Inc.): the counter-case, on technicals, analyst expectations.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
SEDGSEDG on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
SEDGSEDG on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
SEDGSEDG on the peer-relative Value factor, by 11 points.
Momentum
SEDGSEDG on the Momentum factor, by 24 points.
Lower downside
SEDGSEDG on Risk Resilience, by 12 points.
Analyst upside
PLUGPLUG on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors SEDG, analyst targets favor PLUG. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | PLUG | SEDG | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +49% | +8.9% | PLUG has more room |
| Target dispersion | +107% | +76.8% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 3 | 8 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SEDG. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | SEDG | 31 vs 47 |
| Fundamentals | SEDG | revenue growth 9% vs 11.5%; EPS growth 22.2% vs 47.9%; TTM ROE -176.2% vs -62.5%; gross margin -18.5% vs 22.2%; operating margin -70.2% vs -9.7% |
| Valuation | SEDG | Value 46 vs 57 |
| Technicals | PLUG | Price vs 50-day -5.1% vs -14.6%; vs 200-day -14.8% vs -12.7% |
| Risk Resilience | SEDG | Risk Resilience 31 vs 43 |
| Analyst expectations | PLUG | Target upside 49% vs 8.9% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of PLUG and SEDG and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 16 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on SEDG.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10SEDG lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 6 to 16 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- SEDG +16
- 31 vs 47
- 7 sessions ago
- SEDG +15
- 30 vs 45
- 30 sessions ago
- SEDG +6
- 33 vs 39
- 90 sessions ago
- SEDG +13
- 28 vs 41
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (11.86%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (6.04%)
1 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (3.61%)
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
SEDG leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.47%, AIQ 0 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -5.63%, AIQ +2 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1PLUG closes the Momentum gap — currently 24 points behind, the largest single contributor to SEDG's edge.
- 2PLUG's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3SEDG's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 3 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
SEDG leads on balance| Metric | PLUG | SEDG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 9% | 11.5% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 22.2% | 47.9% |
| Gross margin | -18.5% | 22.2% |
| Operating margin | -70.2% | -9.7% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -176.2% | -62.5% |
| Debt to equity | 1.41 | 0.96 |
Performance
SEDG leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | PLUG | SEDG |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 1% | 8.2% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -7.9% | 14.8% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -26.2% | -32.6% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -5.4% | 1.8% |
| Year to date | 7.1% | 27.4% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 46.5% | 9.9% |
Technicals
PLUG has the stronger structure| Metric | PLUG | SEDG |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 45.4 | 69.6 |
| ADX (14) | 13.3 | 17 |
| Price vs 50-day | -5.1% | -14.6% |
| Price vs 200-day | -14.8% | -12.7% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 53.7% | 73% |
Risk
SEDG is the more resilient| Metric | PLUG | SEDG |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.42 | 2.54 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.83 | 0.66 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.88 | 1.07 |
| Max drawdown | -56.7% | -62% |
| Current drawdown | -49% | -53.2% |
| Annualized volatility | 97.9% | 99.6% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -8.2% | -9% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, PLUG or SEDG?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, SEDG is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 47 against PLUG's 31. The edge comes from momentum and quality. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is PLUG or SEDG the better buy right now?
SEDG carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor SEDG over PLUG?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. SEDG leads Momentum by 24 points; SEDG leads Quality by 17 points; SEDG leads Risk Resilience by 12 points. SEDG leads on all four AIQ factor dimensions. Value is itself one of those four, so the sweep is not explained by PLUG simply being cheaper — it warrants extra scrutiny for unmodeled catalysts, forward expectations or event risk the factors do not capture.
Which has more analyst upside, PLUG or SEDG?
Analyst price targets imply +49% upside for PLUG and +8.9% for SEDG, so the Street currently favors PLUG. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors SEDG. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, PLUG or SEDG?
SEDG is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. SEDG on the peer-relative Value factor, by 11 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, PLUG or SEDG?
SEDG on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, PLUG or SEDG?
SEDG on the Momentum factor, by 24 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, PLUG or SEDG?
SEDG is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. SEDG on Risk Resilience, by 12 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is PLUG more profitable than SEDG?
SEDG leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin -18.5% vs 22.2%; operating margin -70.2% vs -9.7%; ttm roe -176.2% vs -62.5%.
Is SEDG's lead over PLUG getting stronger or weaker?
SEDG lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 6 to 16 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the PLUG vs SEDG verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: PLUG closes the Momentum gap — currently 24 points behind, the largest single contributor to SEDG's edge; PLUG's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; SEDG's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 3 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about PLUG and SEDG?
PLUG: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. SEDG: 1 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on PLUG is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On SEDG it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare PLUG and SEDG with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.