PLUG vs SEDG Stock Comparison
SEDG currently leads PLUG in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 39 vs 28. The clearest difference is quality.
What is the main difference between PLUG and SEDG?
SEDG leads the current stock comparison as SolarEdge Technologies, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Plug Power Inc. vs SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
SEDG leads
SEDG leads by 11 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Value. Wall Street currently favors PLUG on target upside.
Competitive: 5 of 6 evidence groups support SEDG.
Plug Power Inc.
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors SEDG over PLUG, 39 versus 28 as of Oct 31, 2026. SEDG's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and value. SEDG also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors PLUG. 5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SEDG today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. SEDG leads on all four AIQ factor dimensions. Value is itself one of those four, so a sweep is not explained by valuation alone — it deserves additional scrutiny for unmodeled catalysts, expectations or event risk.
Compare Plug Power Inc. and SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price return from daily closes; distributions are not included.
Price return comparison
Growth of $10,000, price only
Split-adjusted closes only. Distributions are excluded, which understates the return of any fund or stock that pays them.
Compare PLUG and SEDG against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality9 vs 26SEDG +17
- Value46 vs 57SEDG +11
- Risk Resilience33 vs 43SEDG +10
- Momentum25 vs 32SEDG +7
5 of 6 evidence groups favor SEDG. SEDG’s edge is concentrated in quality and value.
The central trade-off
SEDG (SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and value.
PLUG (Plug Power Inc.): the counter-case, on analyst expectations.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
SEDGSEDG on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
SEDGSEDG on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
SEDGSEDG on the peer-relative Value factor, by 11 points.
Momentum
SEDGSEDG on the Momentum factor, by 7 points.
Lower downside
SEDGSEDG on Risk Resilience, by 10 points.
Analyst upside
PLUGPLUG on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors SEDG, analyst targets favor PLUG. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | PLUG | SEDG | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +75.8% | +19.3% | PLUG has more room |
| Target dispersion | +158.3% | +80.9% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 3 | 9 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SEDG. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | SEDG | 28 vs 39 |
| Fundamentals | SEDG | revenue growth 9% vs 11.5%; EPS growth 22.2% vs 47.9%; TTM ROE -176.2% vs -62.5%; gross margin -18.5% vs 22.2%; operating margin -70.2% vs -9.7% |
| Valuation | SEDG | Value 46 vs 57 |
| Technicals | SEDG | Price vs 50-day -27.9% vs -8.7%; vs 200-day -41% vs -29.7% |
| Risk Resilience | SEDG | Risk Resilience 33 vs 43 |
| Analyst expectations | PLUG | Target upside 75.8% vs 19.3% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of PLUG and SEDG and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 11 points.
- 5 of 6 covered evidence groups point the same way. (supports the conclusion holding)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on SEDG.
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1PLUG closes the Quality gap — currently 17 points behind, the largest single contributor to SEDG's edge.
- 2PLUG generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as Golden Cross Active or MACD Bullish Crossover.
- 3SEDG starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
SEDG leads on balance| Metric | PLUG | SEDG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 9% | 11.5% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 22.2% | 47.9% |
| Gross margin | -18.5% | 22.2% |
| Operating margin | -70.2% | -9.7% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -176.2% | -62.5% |
| Debt to equity | 1.41 | 0.96 |
Performance
SEDG leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | PLUG | SEDG |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 0.7% | -11.1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -26.8% | -7.5% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -32.1% | -29.4% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -56.7% | -29.1% |
| Year to date | -27.9% | 2.2% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -51.9% | -24.4% |
Technicals
SEDG has the stronger structure| Metric | PLUG | SEDG |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 22.3 | 38.5 |
| ADX (14) | 42.2 | 18.6 |
| Price vs 50-day | -27.9% | -8.7% |
| Price vs 200-day | -41% | -29.7% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 44.4% | 60.4% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, PLUG or SEDG?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, SEDG is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 39 against PLUG's 28. The edge comes from quality and value. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is PLUG or SEDG the better buy right now?
SEDG carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 5 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor SEDG over PLUG?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. SEDG leads Quality by 17 points; SEDG leads Value by 11 points; SEDG leads Risk Resilience by 10 points. SEDG leads on all four AIQ factor dimensions. Value is itself one of those four, so the sweep is not explained by PLUG simply being cheaper — it warrants extra scrutiny for unmodeled catalysts, forward expectations or event risk the factors do not capture.
Which has more analyst upside, PLUG or SEDG?
Analyst price targets imply +75.8% upside for PLUG and +19.3% for SEDG, so the Street currently favors PLUG. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors SEDG. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, PLUG or SEDG?
SEDG is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. SEDG on the peer-relative Value factor, by 11 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, PLUG or SEDG?
SEDG on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, PLUG or SEDG?
SEDG on the Momentum factor, by 7 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, PLUG or SEDG?
SEDG is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. SEDG on Risk Resilience, by 10 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is PLUG more profitable than SEDG?
SEDG leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin -18.5% vs 22.2%; operating margin -70.2% vs -9.7%; ttm roe -176.2% vs -62.5%.
What would change the PLUG vs SEDG verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: PLUG closes the Quality gap — currently 17 points behind, the largest single contributor to SEDG's edge; PLUG generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as Golden Cross Active or MACD Bullish Crossover; SEDG starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
Compare PLUG and SEDG with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.