PNR vs TT Stock Comparison
Compare PNR and TT across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between PNR and TT?
PNR leads the current stock comparison as Pentair plc, with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Pentair plc vs Trane Technologies plc
PNR leads
PNR leads by 2 AIQ points, primarily on Value.
Fragile: 2 of 6 evidence groups support PNR, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Pentair plc
Trane Technologies plc
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors PNR over TT, 53 versus 51 as of Sep 11, 2026. PNR's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value, while TT holds the stronger quality profile. PNR also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor PNR today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. PNR lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 2 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Pentair plc and Trane Technologies plc across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare PNR and TT against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value67 vs 39PNR +28
- Quality59 vs 72TT +13
- Momentum24 vs 31TT +7
- Risk Resilience63 vs 65Even
2 of 6 evidence groups favor PNR. PNR’s edge is concentrated in value; TT keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
PNR's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — PNR and TT both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
PNR (Pentair plc): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value.
TT (Trane Technologies plc): the counter-case, on quality, momentum, fundamentals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
PNRPNR on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
TTTT on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
PNRPNR on the peer-relative Value factor, by 28 points.
Momentum
TTTT on the Momentum factor, by 7 points.
Lower downside
TTTT carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
PNRPNR on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | PNR | TT | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +55.3% | +23.2% | PNR has more room |
| Target dispersion | +58% | +20.2% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 10 | 8 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor PNR. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 53 vs 51 |
| Fundamentals | TTon balance | revenue growth -10% vs 27.9%; EPS growth -24.5% vs 58.4%; TTM ROE 17.1% vs 34.5%; gross margin 41.3% vs 35.4%; operating margin 19.5% vs 17.9% — TT takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | PNR | Value 67 vs 39 |
| Technicals | TT | Price vs 50-day -14.2% vs -5%; vs 200-day -33.3% vs -1.1% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 63 vs 65 |
| Analyst expectations | PNR | Target upside 55.3% vs 23.2% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of PNR and TT and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on PNR.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10PNR lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 2 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- PNR +2
- 53 vs 51
- 7 sessions ago
- PNR +4
- 54 vs 50
- 30 sessions ago
- PNR +2
- 56 vs 54
- 90 sessions ago
- PNR +3
- 59 vs 56
The lead changed hands 6 times in this window, most recently on Aug 19 when PNR moved ahead of TT.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 5 bearish, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (29.03%)
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
1 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (4.73%)
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
PNR leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.26%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.61%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1TT closes the Value gap — currently 28 points behind, the largest single contributor to PNR's edge.
- 2TT's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it.
- 3PNR's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 5 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
TT leads on balance| Metric | PNR | TT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -10% | 27.9% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -24.5% | 58.4% |
| Gross margin | 41.3% | 35.4% |
| Operating margin | 19.5% | 17.9% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 17.1% | 34.5% |
| Debt to equity | 0.47 | 0.53 |
Performance
TT leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | PNR | TT |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -5.2% | 0.2% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -13.7% | -8.1% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -20.5% | -2.1% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -37.6% | 1.7% |
| Year to date | -42.5% | 13% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -48.3% | 6% |
Technicals
TT has the stronger structure| Metric | PNR | TT |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 14.1 | 39.7 |
| ADX (14) | 27.4 | 21.9 |
| Price vs 50-day | -14.2% | -5% |
| Price vs 200-day | -33.3% | -1.1% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 25% | 17.3% |
Risk
Split| Metric | PNR | TT |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.98 | 1.09 |
| Sharpe ratio | -1.96 | 0.26 |
| Sortino ratio | -2.16 | 0.38 |
| Max drawdown | -49.6% | -16.1% |
| Current drawdown | -49.6% | -12.6% |
| Annualized volatility | 32.6% | 28.5% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.7% | -3% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, PNR or TT?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, PNR is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 53 against TT's 51. The edge comes from value. TT is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is PNR or TT the better buy right now?
PNR carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor PNR over TT?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. PNR leads Value by 28 points; TT leads Quality by 13 points; TT leads Momentum by 7 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, PNR or TT?
Analyst price targets imply +55.3% upside for PNR and +23.2% for TT, so the Street currently favors PNR. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, PNR or TT?
PNR is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. PNR on the peer-relative Value factor, by 28 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, PNR or TT?
TT on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, PNR or TT?
TT on the Momentum factor, by 7 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, PNR or TT?
TT is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. TT carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is PNR more profitable than TT?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 41.3% vs 35.4%; operating margin 19.5% vs 17.9%; ttm roe 17.1% vs 34.5%. PNR leads on two measures and TT on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is PNR's lead over TT getting stronger or weaker?
PNR lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 2 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 6 times in that window, most recently on 2026-08-19, when PNR moved ahead of TT.
What would change the PNR vs TT verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: TT closes the Value gap — currently 28 points behind, the largest single contributor to PNR's edge; TT's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it; PNR's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 5 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about PNR and TT?
PNR: 1 bullish / 5 bearish, conflicted. TT: 1 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on PNR is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On TT it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare PNR and TT with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.