PNR vs VLTO Stock Comparison
Compare PNR and VLTO across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between PNR and VLTO?
VLTO leads the current stock comparison as Veralto Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Pentair plc vs Veralto Corporation
VLTO leads
VLTO leads by 1 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Momentum, but the lead has narrowed from 10 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors PNR on target upside.
Fragile: 2 of 6 evidence groups support VLTO, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Pentair plc
Veralto Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors VLTO over PNR, 54 versus 53 as of Sep 11, 2026. VLTO's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and momentum, while PNR holds the stronger value profile. VLTO also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors PNR. 2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor VLTO today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. VLTO lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 10 to 1 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Pentair plc and Veralto Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare PNR and VLTO against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value67 vs 49PNR +18
- Quality59 vs 74VLTO +15
- Momentum24 vs 29VLTO +5
- Risk Resilience63 vs 65Even
2 of 6 evidence groups favor VLTO. VLTO’s edge is concentrated in quality and momentum; PNR keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum -1
New signals
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
VLTO's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — PNR and VLTO both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
VLTO (Veralto Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and momentum.
PNR (Pentair plc): the counter-case, on value, valuation, analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 25% against 19.8%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
VLTOVLTO on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
VLTOVLTO on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
PNRPNR on the peer-relative Value factor, by 18 points.
Momentum
VLTOVLTO on the Momentum factor, by 5 points.
Lower downside
VLTOVLTO carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
PNRPNR on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors VLTO, analyst targets favor PNR. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | PNR | VLTO | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +55.3% | +16.2% | PNR has more room |
| Target dispersion | +58% | +10.1% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 10 | 6 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor VLTO. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 53 vs 54 |
| Fundamentals | VLTO | revenue growth -10% vs 3.7%; EPS growth -24.5% vs -4.9%; TTM ROE 17.1% vs 32.8%; gross margin 41.3% vs 60.2%; operating margin 19.5% vs 22.7% |
| Valuation | PNR | Value 67 vs 49 |
| Technicals | VLTO | Price vs 50-day -14.2% vs -1.5%; vs 200-day -33.3% vs 0.1% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 63 vs 65 |
| Analyst expectations | PNR | Target upside 55.3% vs 16.2% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of PNR and VLTO and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on VLTO.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10VLTO lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 10 to 1 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- VLTO +1
- 53 vs 54
- 7 sessions ago
- VLTO +7
- 54 vs 61
- 30 sessions ago
- VLTO +10
- 56 vs 66
- 90 sessions ago
- VLTO +6
- 59 vs 65
The lead changed hands 3 times in this window, most recently on Jul 6 when VLTO moved ahead of PNR.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 5 bearish, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (29.03%)
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
3 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (2.26%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
VLTO leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.26%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.7%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1PNR closes the Quality gap — currently 15 points behind, the largest single contributor to VLTO's edge.
- 2PNR's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3VLTO's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 9 points over 30 sessions, and a further 1-point move would eliminate VLTO's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
VLTO leads on balance| Metric | PNR | VLTO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -10% | 3.7% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -24.5% | -4.9% |
| Gross margin | 41.3% | 60.2% |
| Operating margin | 19.5% | 22.7% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 17.1% | 32.8% |
| Debt to equity | 0.47 | 1.09 |
Performance
VLTO leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | PNR | VLTO |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -5.2% | -3.9% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -13.7% | -3.3% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -20.5% | 13.1% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -37.6% | 2.3% |
| Year to date | -42.5% | -6.3% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -48.3% | -12.6% |
Technicals
VLTO has the stronger structure| Metric | PNR | VLTO |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 14.1 | 17.6 |
| ADX (14) | 27.4 | 23.3 |
| Price vs 50-day | -14.2% | -1.5% |
| Price vs 200-day | -33.3% | 0.1% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 25% | 19.8% |
Risk
Split| Metric | PNR | VLTO |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.98 | 0.27 |
| Sharpe ratio | -1.96 | -0.56 |
| Sortino ratio | -2.16 | -0.88 |
| Max drawdown | -49.6% | -24.6% |
| Current drawdown | -49.6% | -14.3% |
| Annualized volatility | 32.6% | 23.1% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.7% | -1.9% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, PNR or VLTO?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, VLTO is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 54 against PNR's 53. The edge comes from quality and momentum. PNR is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is PNR or VLTO the better buy right now?
VLTO carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor VLTO over PNR?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. PNR leads Value by 18 points; VLTO leads Quality by 15 points; VLTO leads Momentum by 5 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, PNR or VLTO?
Analyst price targets imply +55.3% upside for PNR and +16.2% for VLTO, so the Street currently favors PNR. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors VLTO. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, PNR or VLTO?
PNR is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. PNR on the peer-relative Value factor, by 18 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, PNR or VLTO?
VLTO on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, PNR or VLTO?
VLTO on the Momentum factor, by 5 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, PNR or VLTO?
VLTO is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. VLTO carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is PNR more profitable than VLTO?
VLTO leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 41.3% vs 60.2%; operating margin 19.5% vs 22.7%; ttm roe 17.1% vs 32.8%.
Is VLTO's lead over PNR getting stronger or weaker?
VLTO lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 10 to 1 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 3 times in that window, most recently on 2026-07-06, when VLTO moved ahead of PNR.
What would change the PNR vs VLTO verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: PNR closes the Quality gap — currently 15 points behind, the largest single contributor to VLTO's edge; PNR's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; VLTO's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 9 points over 30 sessions, and a further 1-point move would eliminate VLTO's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about PNR and VLTO?
PNR: 1 bullish / 5 bearish, conflicted. VLTO: 3 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on PNR is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On VLTO it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare PNR and VLTO with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.