POR vs SR Stock Comparison
SR currently leads POR in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 56 vs 46. The clearest difference is momentum, while POR has the stronger risk resilience profile.
What is the main difference between POR and SR?
SR leads the current stock comparison as Spire Inc., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Portland General Electric Company vs Spire Inc.
SR leads
SR leads by 10 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum, and the lead has widened from 0 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors POR on target upside.
Fragile: 2 of 6 evidence groups support SR, its lead is widening, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Portland General Electric Company
Spire Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors SR over POR, 56 versus 46 as of Oct 31, 2026. SR's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum, while POR holds the stronger risk resilience profile. SR also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors POR. 2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SR today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. SR lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 0 to 10 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Portland General Electric Company and Spire Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare POR and SR against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum35 vs 81SR +46
- Risk Resilience56 vs 50POR +6
- Quality37 vs 36Even
- Value59 vs 58Even
2 of 6 evidence groups favor SR. SR’s edge is concentrated in momentum; POR keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-30, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-29.
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
SR's lead was unchanged in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — POR and SR both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
SR (Spire Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum.
POR (Portland General Electric Company): the counter-case, on risk resilience, fundamentals, analyst expectations.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
SRSR on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
PORPOR on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
SRSR on the Momentum factor, by 46 points.
Lower downside
PORPOR on Risk Resilience, by 6 points.
Analyst upside
PORPOR on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors SR, analyst targets favor POR. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | POR | SR | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +18.2% | +6.7% | POR has more room |
| Target dispersion | +19% | +25.6% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 2 | 7 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | POR | SR |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | 5.54% | 4.78% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $1.585 | $2.518 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $2.075 | $3.180 |
| Years increased | 5 | 5 |
| No cut in window | Yes | Yes |
| Cohort rank | #227 | #260 |
POR grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 5.54% a year against SR's 4.78%. Neither company reduced its regular dividend in any year of the window.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SR. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | SR | 46 vs 56 |
| Fundamentals | PORon balance | revenue growth -10.5% vs -58.8%; EPS growth 43.9% vs -22.6%; TTM ROE 6.3% vs 21.4%; gross margin 44.4% vs 32.7%; operating margin 15.5% vs 19.7% — POR takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | Even | Value 59 vs 58 |
| Technicals | SR | Price vs 50-day -4.9% vs 8.8%; vs 200-day -11.6% vs 1.1% |
| Risk Resilience | POR | Risk Resilience 56 vs 50 |
| Analyst expectations | POR | Target upside 18.2% vs 6.7% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of POR and SR and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 10 points.
- Only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on SR.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jul 1 – Oct 30SR lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 0 to 10 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- SR +10
- 46 vs 56
- 7 sessions ago
- SR +8
- 48 vs 56
- 30 sessions ago
- Level
- 44 vs 44
- 90 sessions ago
- Level
- 51 vs 51
The lead changed hands 3 times in this window, most recently on Oct 6 when SR moved ahead of POR.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only POR
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- 52-Week Low Proximity — bearish, risk, long horizon (1.8%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
2 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted
Only SR
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
Both carry 2 more signals that do not separate them: Death Cross Active, MACD Bullish Crossover.
SR leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.52%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +1.48%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1POR closes the Momentum gap — currently 46 points behind, the largest single contributor to SR's edge.
- 2POR's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3SR's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
POR leads on balance| Metric | POR | SR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -10.5% | -58.8% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 43.9% | -22.6% |
| Gross margin | 44.4% | 32.7% |
| Operating margin | 15.5% | 19.7% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 6.3% | 21.4% |
| Debt to equity | 1.26 | 2.03 |
Performance
SR leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | POR | SR |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 0.8% | 3.6% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -0.8% | 12.2% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -11.6% | 6.2% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -13.3% | -4.7% |
| Year to date | -7.8% | 3.4% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -3.3% | -3.8% |
Technicals
SR has the stronger structure| Metric | POR | SR |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 41.6 | 80.7 |
| ADX (14) | 25.1 | 35.1 |
| Price vs 50-day | -4.9% | 8.8% |
| Price vs 200-day | -11.6% | 1.1% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 17.5% | 17.8% |
Risk
POR is the more resilient| Metric | POR | SR |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | -0.08 | -0.23 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.28 | -0.26 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.42 | -0.41 |
| Max drawdown | -19.8% | -20.2% |
| Current drawdown | -18.4% | -10.2% |
| Annualized volatility | 19.6% | 19.6% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -1.9% | -2.1% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, POR or SR?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, SR is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 56 against POR's 46. The edge comes from momentum. POR is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is POR or SR the better buy right now?
SR carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor SR over POR?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. SR leads Momentum by 46 points; POR leads Risk Resilience by 6 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, POR or SR?
Analyst price targets imply +18.2% upside for POR and +6.7% for SR, so the Street currently favors POR. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors SR. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, POR or SR?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, POR or SR?
POR on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, POR or SR?
SR on the Momentum factor, by 46 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, POR or SR?
POR is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. POR on Risk Resilience, by 6 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is POR more profitable than SR?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 44.4% vs 32.7%; operating margin 15.5% vs 19.7%; ttm roe 6.3% vs 21.4%. POR leads on one measure and SR on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is SR's lead over POR getting stronger or weaker?
SR lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 0 to 10 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-07-01 and 2026-10-30. The lead has changed hands 3 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-06, when SR moved ahead of POR.
What would change the POR vs SR verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: POR closes the Momentum gap — currently 46 points behind, the largest single contributor to SR's edge; POR's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; SR's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about POR and SR?
POR: 1 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. SR: 2 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on POR is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On SR it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare POR and SR with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.