POWI vs SITM Stock Comparison
Compare POWI and SITM across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between POWI and SITM?
POWI leads the current stock comparison as Power Integrations, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from risk resilience and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Power Integrations, Inc. vs SiTime Corporation
POWI leads
POWI leads by 9 AIQ points, primarily on Risk Resilience and Quality, and the lead has widened from 4 points over 30 sessions.
Stable: 5 of 6 evidence groups support POWI, its lead is widening, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
Power Integrations, Inc.
SiTime Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors POWI over SITM, 44 versus 35 as of Sep 11, 2026. POWI's advantage is driven primarily by stronger risk resilience and quality, while SITM holds the stronger momentum profile. POWI also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor POWI today, and the comparison is rated Stable on stability. POWI lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 4 to 9 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Power Integrations, Inc. and SiTime Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare POWI and SITM against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum25 vs 49SITM +24
- Risk Resilience53 vs 29POWI +24
- Quality58 vs 38POWI +20
- Value43 vs 24POWI +19
5 of 6 evidence groups favor POWI. POWI’s edge is concentrated in risk resilience and quality; SITM keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
No factor moved materially.
New signals
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum +10
New signals
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
POWI's lead narrowed by 2 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — POWI and SITM both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
POWI (Power Integrations, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by risk resilience and quality.
SITM (SiTime Corporation): the counter-case, on momentum, technicals — but at materially higher volatility, 70.6% against 39.5%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
POWIPOWI on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
POWIPOWI on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
POWIPOWI on the peer-relative Value factor, by 19 points.
Momentum
SITMSITM on the Momentum factor, by 24 points.
Lower downside
POWIPOWI on Risk Resilience, by 24 points.
Analyst upside
POWIPOWI on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | POWI | SITM | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +62.6% | +27.9% | POWI has more room |
| Target dispersion | +11.8% | +49.2% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 2 | 6 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor POWI. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | POWI | 44 vs 35 |
| Fundamentals | POWIon balance | revenue growth 9.8% vs 38.6%; EPS growth 203% vs 4.4%; TTM ROE 3.7% vs 1.3%; gross margin 53.6% vs 58.7%; operating margin 7.9% vs -1.7% — POWI takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | POWI | Value 43 vs 24 |
| Technicals | SITM | Price vs 50-day -15.4% vs 5.4%; vs 200-day -12% vs 19.2% |
| Risk Resilience | POWI | Risk Resilience 53 vs 29 |
| Analyst expectations | POWI | Target upside 62.6% vs 27.9% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of POWI and SITM and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion rests on a wide gap and broad agreement. It is unlikely to turn on a single session.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 9 points.
- 5 of 6 covered evidence groups point the same way. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on POWI.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10POWI lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 4 to 9 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- POWI +9
- 44 vs 35
- 7 sessions ago
- POWI +13
- 44 vs 31
- 30 sessions ago
- POWI +4
- 45 vs 41
- 90 sessions ago
- POWI +14
- 42 vs 28
The lead changed hands 2 times in this window, most recently on Aug 11 when POWI moved ahead of SITM.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
3 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (9.10%)
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (5.49%)
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (19.39%)
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (6.82%)
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +5.21%, AIQ 0 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +5.54%, AIQ +2 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1SITM closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 24 points behind, the largest single contributor to POWI's edge.
- 2SITM's ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3POWI's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
POWI leads on balance| Metric | POWI | SITM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 9.8% | 38.6% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 203% | 4.4% |
| Gross margin | 53.6% | 58.7% |
| Operating margin | 7.9% | -1.7% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 3.7% | 1.3% |
| Debt to equity | 0 | 1.29 |
Performance
SITM leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | POWI | SITM |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -1.2% | 5.9% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -22.2% | -11.5% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -33.4% | -9.3% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 6.1% | 71.6% |
| Year to date | 39.8% | 70.5% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 10.4% | 146.3% |
Technicals
SITM has the stronger structure| Metric | POWI | SITM |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 27.9 | 50.8 |
| ADX (14) | 34.5 | 12.4 |
| Price vs 50-day | -15.4% | 5.4% |
| Price vs 200-day | -12% | 19.2% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 39.5% | 70.6% |
Risk
POWI is the more resilient| Metric | POWI | SITM |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.35 | 2.82 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.41 | 1.41 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.68 | 2.62 |
| Max drawdown | -43.1% | -48.7% |
| Current drawdown | -43.1% | -33.2% |
| Annualized volatility | 63.2% | 85.7% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -6.5% | -7.7% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, POWI or SITM?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, POWI is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 44 against SITM's 35. The edge comes from risk resilience and quality. SITM is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is POWI or SITM the better buy right now?
POWI carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Stable — 5 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Stable rating means the gap is wide and the evidence is broad, so the conclusion is unlikely to turn on a single session.
Why does the AIQ Score favor POWI over SITM?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. SITM leads Momentum by 24 points; POWI leads Risk Resilience by 24 points; POWI leads Quality by 20 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, POWI or SITM?
Analyst price targets imply +62.6% upside for POWI and +27.9% for SITM, so the Street currently favors POWI. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, POWI or SITM?
POWI is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. POWI on the peer-relative Value factor, by 19 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, POWI or SITM?
POWI on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, POWI or SITM?
SITM on the Momentum factor, by 24 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, POWI or SITM?
POWI is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. POWI on Risk Resilience, by 24 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is POWI more profitable than SITM?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 53.6% vs 58.7%; operating margin 7.9% vs -1.7%; ttm roe 3.7% vs 1.3%. POWI leads on two measures and SITM on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is POWI's lead over SITM getting stronger or weaker?
POWI lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 4 to 9 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 2 times in that window, most recently on 2026-08-11, when POWI moved ahead of SITM.
What would change the POWI vs SITM verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: SITM closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 24 points behind, the largest single contributor to POWI's edge; SITM's ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; POWI's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about POWI and SITM?
POWI: 3 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. SITM: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. The most decision-relevant rule on POWI is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On SITM it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare POWI and SITM with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.