PPG vs SHW Stock Comparison
PPG currently leads SHW in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 64 vs 59. The clearest difference is value, while SHW has the stronger momentum profile.
What is the main difference between PPG and SHW?
PPG leads the current stock comparison as PPG Industries, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
PPG Industries, Inc. vs The Sherwin-Williams Company
PPG leads
PPG leads by 5 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Risk Resilience, but the lead has narrowed from 8 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 4 of 6 evidence groups support PPG, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
PPG Industries, Inc.
The Sherwin-Williams Company
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors PPG over SHW, 64 versus 59 as of Oct 24, 2026. PPG's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and risk resilience, while SHW holds the stronger momentum profile. PPG also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor PPG today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. PPG lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 8 to 5 points over 30 sessions.
Compare PPG Industries, Inc. and The Sherwin-Williams Company across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare PPG and SHW against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value66 vs 41PPG +25
- Risk Resilience67 vs 54PPG +13
- Momentum71 vs 82SHW +11
- Quality54 vs 62SHW +8
4 of 6 evidence groups favor PPG. PPG’s edge is concentrated in value and risk resilience; SHW keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-23, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-22.
Largest factor move: Momentum -11
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 2 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum -6
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 2 active signals are unchanged.
PPG's lead narrowed by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — PPG and SHW both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
PPG (PPG Industries, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and risk resilience.
SHW (The Sherwin-Williams Company): the counter-case, on momentum, quality, fundamentals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
PPGPPG on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
SHWSHW on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
PPGPPG on the peer-relative Value factor, by 25 points.
Momentum
SHWSHW on the Momentum factor, by 11 points.
Lower downside
PPGPPG on Risk Resilience, by 13 points.
Analyst upside
PPGPPG on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | PPG | SHW | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +18.3% | +12.2% | PPG has more room |
| Target dispersion | +18.3% | +23.8% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 8 | 14 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | PPG | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | 5.77% | 12.08% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $2.100 | $1.787 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $2.780 | $3.160 |
| Years increased | 5 | 5 |
| No cut in window | Yes | Yes |
| Cohort rank | #220 | #63 |
SHW grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 12.08% a year against PPG's 5.77%. Neither company reduced its regular dividend in any year of the window.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor PPG. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | PPG | 64 vs 59 |
| Fundamentals | SHW | revenue growth 14.4% vs 19.8%; EPS growth 14.6% vs 58.3%; TTM ROE 19.5% vs 62.1%; gross margin 40.1% vs 49.1%; operating margin 12.5% vs 16.4% |
| Valuation | PPG | Value 66 vs 41 |
| Technicals | SHW | Price vs 50-day 2% vs 1.7%; vs 200-day -1.4% vs 1.1% |
| Risk Resilience | PPG | Risk Resilience 67 vs 54 |
| Analyst expectations | PPG | Target upside 18.3% vs 12.2% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of PPG and SHW and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on PPG.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 24 – Oct 23PPG lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 8 to 5 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- PPG +5
- 64 vs 59
- 7 sessions ago
- Level
- 57 vs 57
- 30 sessions ago
- PPG +8
- 57 vs 49
- 90 sessions ago
- PPG +11
- 61 vs 50
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
PPG and SHW carry the same 2 signals, so the signals do not separate them: Death Cross Active, MACD Bullish Crossover.
PPG leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -2.19%, AIQ -3 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -2.48%, AIQ -2 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1SHW closes the Value gap — currently 25 points behind, the largest single contributor to PPG's edge.
- 2SHW's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3PPG's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 3 points over 30 sessions, and a further 5-point move would eliminate PPG's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
SHW leads on balance| Metric | PPG | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 14.4% | 19.8% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 14.6% | 58.3% |
| Gross margin | 40.1% | 49.1% |
| Operating margin | 12.5% | 16.4% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 19.5% | 62.1% |
| Debt to equity | 0.88 | 3.69 |
Performance
PPG leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | PPG | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 3% | 0.6% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 2.9% | 2.4% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -6.6% | 3% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 0.7% | -0.2% |
| Year to date | 8% | 4% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 6% | -0.4% |
Technicals
SHW has the stronger structure| Metric | PPG | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 65.2 | 65 |
| ADX (14) | 20.1 | 20.6 |
| Price vs 50-day | 2% | 1.7% |
| Price vs 200-day | -1.4% | 1.1% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 20.8% | 25% |
Risk
PPG is the more resilient| Metric | PPG | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.05 | 0.89 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.28 | 0.03 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.44 | 0.07 |
| Max drawdown | -26.1% | -21.4% |
| Current drawdown | -15.9% | -9.5% |
| Annualized volatility | 30.6% | 28.1% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.1% | -2.5% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, PPG or SHW?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, PPG is the stronger of the two as of Oct 24, 2026, scoring 64 against SHW's 59. The edge comes from value and risk resilience. SHW is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is PPG or SHW the better buy right now?
PPG carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 24, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor PPG over SHW?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. PPG leads Value by 25 points; PPG leads Risk Resilience by 13 points; SHW leads Momentum by 11 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, PPG or SHW?
Analyst price targets imply +18.3% upside for PPG and +12.2% for SHW, so the Street currently favors PPG. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, PPG or SHW?
PPG is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. PPG on the peer-relative Value factor, by 25 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, PPG or SHW?
SHW on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, PPG or SHW?
SHW on the Momentum factor, by 11 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, PPG or SHW?
PPG is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. PPG on Risk Resilience, by 13 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is PPG more profitable than SHW?
SHW leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 40.1% vs 49.1%; operating margin 12.5% vs 16.4%; ttm roe 19.5% vs 62.1%.
Is PPG's lead over SHW getting stronger or weaker?
PPG lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 8 to 5 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-24 and 2026-10-23. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the PPG vs SHW verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: SHW closes the Value gap — currently 25 points behind, the largest single contributor to PPG's edge; SHW's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; PPG's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 3 points over 30 sessions, and a further 5-point move would eliminate PPG's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about PPG and SHW?
PPG: 1 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. SHW: 1 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on PPG is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On SHW it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare PPG and SHW with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.